Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that there are 1 million federal workers at the lowest level of the federal bureaucracy and that above them there are multiple layers of supervisors and supervisors-of-supervisors. Assume that each higher level is one-tenth the size of the one below it because the government is using a 10: 1 ratio of supervisees to supervisors. That is, for every 10 workers at the bottom, there is 1 supervisor; for every 10 of those supervisors, there is 1 supervisor-ofsupervisors; for every one of those supervisors-of-supervisors, there is a supervisor-of-supervisors-of-supervisors; and so on, all the way up the bureaucratic pyramid to the president. LO5.1 a. How many supervisors will there be in each supervisory layer of the federal bureaucracy? Start with the layer of supervisors directly above the 1 million workers at the bottom. b. How many supervisors are there in total at all levels of the federal bureaucratic pyramid, including the president? c. If you count the 1 million workers at the bottom as the first layer of the federal bureaucracy, how many total layers are there, including the president? d. How many federal employees are there in total at all layers, including the president? e. What fraction of all federal employees are supervisory, including the president?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. 100,000, 10,000, 1,000, 100, 10, 1. b. 111,111. c. 7 layers. d. 1,111,111 employees. e. 10% supervisory.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Supervisors

The number of supervisors directly above the 1 million workers is calculated using the 10:1 ratio, which results in 100,000 supervisors (because \(1,000,000 \div 10 = 100,000\)).
02

Calculate Higher Level Supervisors

For each subsequent layer, divide the number of supervisors in the previous layer by 10. This results in the following: 10,000 supervisors-of-supervisors (\(100,000 \div 10 = 10,000\)), 1,000 supervisors-of-supervisors-of-supervisors (\(10,000 \div 10 = 1,000\)), 100 of the next level of supervisors (\(1,000 \div 10 = 100\)), 10 at the next level (\(100 \div 10 = 10\)), and finally 1 president (\(10 \div 10 = 1\)).
03

Total Supervisors at All Levels

Add up all the supervisors from each layer, including the president: 100,000 + 10,000 + 1,000 + 100 + 10 + 1 = 111,111 supervisors.
04

Determine Total Layers

The total layers include the 1 million workers, supervisors, and the president: 1 million workers form layer 1, and each subsequent supervisory layer forms layers 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, completing layer 7 with the president.
05

Total Federal Employees

Add the 1 million workers to the total number of supervisors: 1,000,000 + 111,111 = 1,111,111 federal employees.
06

Fraction of Supervisory Employees

The fraction of total employees who are supervisory is found by dividing the number of supervisors by the total number of employees: \(\frac{111,111}{1,111,111} \approx 0.1\) or 10%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Federal Employees
Federal employees are an integral part of the government workforce. In this context, they form the base level of the bureaucratic structure. With 1 million federal workers, they perform essential services and tasks necessary for the functioning of various governmental departments and agencies. These employees are often responsible for a wide range of operations, from administrative duties to direct service delivery. They ensure that the day-to-day activities mandated by the government are executed efficiently and serve the public interest.

Here’s a simple breakdown of their role:
  • The operational backbone of government processes.
  • Perform day-to-day responsibilities.
  • Work across various departments that cater to public needs.
Their role is critical not only to the government's functionality but also to providing citizens with the services they require. As we dive deeper into the hierarchical structure, they are essential at each level of this hierarchy.
Supervisory Roles
Supervisory roles play a crucial role in maintaining the order and efficiency of a work environment. These roles exist throughout numerous layers in a hierarchical organization like the federal bureaucracy. Let's explore how they function in this particular structure:

At each level, a supervisor oversees about ten employees. This 10:1 ratio ensures that each supervisor is responsible for a manageable number of workers. It allows them to provide adequate guidance, ensure compliance with policies, and enhance productivity.

Key responsibilities of supervisors include:
  • Guiding and managing the performance of their teams.
  • Ensuring that organizational policies and procedures are followed.
  • Providing feedback and support to employees.
Supervisory roles are vital for:
  • Maintaining order and cohesiveness within teams.
  • Ensuring efficient communication up and down the hierarchy.
This layer-by-layer supervision supports a robust mechanism, ensuring that tasks align with the organization's goals. Supervisory roles step up gradually to higher levels, with more complex responsibilities and broader oversight as they ascend.
Hierarchical Structure
The hierarchical structure is fundamental in organizations, especially those as encompassing as federal bureaucracies. It is characterized by a system of ranking where every level adds a layer of oversight and management towards achieving government objectives.

Distinctive features of this structure include:
  • Multiple layers of management and supervision.
  • A clear chain of command from top to bottom.
  • Specific supervisory ratios to ensure scalability and efficiency.
In our example, starting from 1 million employees at the base, each subsequent layer has fewer employees due to the 10:1 ratio, resulting in a pyramid shape. This form is designed to streamline operations and ensure directives flow efficiently from the top down.

Benefits of a hierarchical structure:
  • Clear lines of authority and responsibility.
  • Enhanced clarity in task delegation and execution.
  • Able to handle large organizations effectively through defined levels.
This ordered structure helps manage vast numbers of federal employees effectively, dividing the vast operation into manageable segments and allowing for specialized tasks to be focused at different levels.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a corrupt provincial government in which each housing inspector examines two newly built structures each week. All the builders in the province are unethical and want to increase their profits by using substandard construction materials, but they can't do that unless they can bribe a housing inspector into approving a substandard building. \(L O 5.2\) a. If bribes cost $$\$ 1,000$$ each, how much will a housing inspector make each year in bribes? (Assume that each inspector works 52 weeks a year and gets bribed for every house he inspects.) b. There is a provincial construction supervisor who gets to hire all of the housing inspectors. He himself is corrupt and expects his housing inspectors to share their bribes with him. Suppose that 20 inspectors work for him and that each passes along half the bribes collected from builders. How much will the construction supervisor collect each year? c. Corrupt officials may have an incentive to reduce the provision of government services to help line their own pockets. Suppose that the provincial construction supervisor decides to cut the total number of housing inspectors from 20 to 10 in order to decrease the supply of new housing permits. This decrease in the supply of permits raises the equilibrium bribe from $$\$ 1,000$$ to $$\$ 2,500$$. How much per year will the construction supervisor now receive if he is still getting half of all the bribes collected by the 10 inspectors? How much more is the construction supervisor getting now than when he had 20 inspectors working in part \(b\) ? Will he personally be happy with the reduction in government services? d. What if reducing the number of inspectors from 20 to 10 only increased the equilibrium bribe from $$\$ 1,000$$ to $$\$ 1,500 ?$$ In this case, how much per year would the construction supervisor collect from his 10 inspectors? How much less is the construction supervisor getting than when he had 20 inspectors working in part \(b\) ? In this case, will the construction supervisor be happy with the reduction in government services? Will he want to go back to using 20 inspectors?

Consider a specific example of the special-interest effect and the collective- action problem. In \(2012,\) it was estimated that the total value of all corn production subsidies in the United States was about $$\$ 3$$ billion. The population of the United States was approximately 300 million people that year. \(L 05.2\) a. On average, how much did corn subsidies cost per person in the United States in \(2012 ?\) (Hint: A billion is a 1 followed by nine zeros, A million is a 1 followed by six zeros.) b. If each person in the United States is only willing to spend $$\$ 0.50$$ to support efforts to overturn the corn subsidy, and if antisubsidy advocates can only raise funds from 10 percent of the population, how much money will they be able to raise for their lobbying efforts? c. If the recipients of corn subsidies donate just 1 percent of the total amount that they receive in subsidies, how much could they raise to support lobbying efforts to continue the corn subsidy? d. By how many dollars does the amount raised by the recipients of the corn subsidy exceed the amount raised by the opponents of the corn subsidy?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free