Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In recent years, Web sites such as zillow.com have made it easier for home sellers to figure out what price to charge for their home-one of the tasks that real estate agents perform for sellers. And a variety of other Web sites enable home buyers and sellers to find each other without using an agent at all. Suppose these new technologies catch on with half of the home sellers in an area, while the other half continues to prefer selling with an agent. Assume that home prices and the commission rate stay unchanged. Before accounting for entry or exit of agents: a. Describe what would happen to a typical agent's \(A T C\) and \(M C\) curves. b. What would happen to the number of homes sold by a typical agent? c. What would happen to the economic profit of a typical agent? Now take account of entry or exit of agents in response to the new technologies available for home selling. Compared to the results you found above, how will entry or exit affect: d. \(A\) typical agent's \(A T C\) and \(M C\) curves? e. The economic profit of the typical agent? f. The number of homes sold by a typical agent?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The advent of technology leads to an increase in ATC, little change in MC, and a decrease in the number of homes sold by an agent, thereby reducing their economic profit in the short term. In the long term, agents can adapt by using technology to reduce costs and increase efficiency. This could lead to a decrease in MC and ATC and an increase in homes sold per agent.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the change in ATC and MC curves

Firstly, if half of the home sellers start using technology to sell their homes and no longer use agents, the number of homes a typical agent would sell will decrease. As the number of units sold decreases, the ATC (Average Total Cost), which is Total Cost/Quantity, would increase because the costs associated with selling a house (advertisements, staging, etc.) are spread over fewer home sales. The MC (Marginal Cost) would remain the same since MC is the change in total cost/change in quantity, and the costs associated with selling an additional home shouldn't change.
02

Analyze the impact on the number of homes sold and agent's profit

Given that there is less demand for their services, the number of homes sold by a typical agent would decrease. Economic profit, which is Total Revenue minus Total Costs, would also decrease. This is due to the increased cost per home sold (greater ATC) and fewer homes sold (less revenue), which cause the total costs to exceed revenue.
03

Analyze agents' responses

In reaction to this, less competitive or less efficient agents might exit the market because they are no longer able to make an economic profit. With the exit of some agents, the remaining agents will see an increase in the number of homes they sell (as they are sharing a smaller but still substantial market). Over time, this could result in a decrease in ATC (due to more homes to divide the total cost with) and a possible increase in economic profit (if their ATC goes down faster than the price they can charge does). However, with more sellers using a direct-to-buyer sales model, the number of homes sold by a typical agent could also still be less than in the original state.
04

Analyze long-term effects

In the long term, we might see a decrease in the MC and ATC as agents who decide to stay in the industry might try to use technology to reduce their costs. Also, if the market becomes too profitable, new agents might enter, which would increase competition, potentially decreasing pricing and reducing the economic profit of a typical agent. On the quantity side, the number of homes sold by each agent would depend on the competition and the number of sellers who prefer to sell through an agent.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following table gives quantity supplied and quantity demanded at various prices in the perfectly competitive meat-packing market: $$\begin{array}{ccc} \text { Price (per lb.) } & \begin{array}{c} Q_{S} \\ \text { (in millions of lbs.) } \end{array} \\ \hline \$ 1.00 & 10 & 100 \\ \$ 1.25 & 15 & 90 \\ \$ 1.50 & 25 & 75 \\ \$ 1.75 & 40 & 63 \\ \$ 2.00 & 55 & 55 \\ \$ 2.25 & 65 & 40 \end{array}$$ Assume that each firm in the meat-packing industry faces the following cost structure: $$\begin{array}{ll} \text { Pounds } & {}{} {T C} \\ \hline 60,000 & \$ 110,000 \\ 61,000 & \$ 111,000 \\ 62,000 & \$ 112,000 \\ 63,000 & \$ 115,000 \end{array}$$ a. What is the profit-maximizing output level for the typical firm? (Hint: Calculate \(M C\) for each change in output, then find the equilibrium price, and calculate \(M R\) for each change in output.) b. Is this market in long-run equilibrium? Why or why not? (Hint: Calculate \(A T C .\) ) c. What do you expect to happen to the number of meat-packing firms over the long run? Why?

Draw a diagram for a perfectly competitive firm in long-run equilibrium. Include only the demand curve facing the firm and its \(L R A T C\) curve. Then show the impact of an excise tax (some number of dollars per unit imposed by the government on this firm only but not on any other firm in the market. Can we say what this firm will do in the long run?

In Chapter \(4,\) you learned that when an excise tax is imposed on buyers or sellers in a competitive market, the equilibrium price rises, and the tax payment is shared between buyers and sellers. To obtain that result, we used the (short-run) market supply curve. Now let's extend the analysis to the long run. Draw a two panel diagram: one panel for the market (demand and short-run supply curves only), the other panel for the typical firm (demand and \(L R A T C\) curves only). Suppose an excise tax (some number of dollars per unit) is imposed on all sellers (firms) in this market. a. Show what will happen in the market in the short run. b. Show what will happen in both diagrams (market and typical firm) in the long run, assuming that this is a constant cost industry. [Hint: After the tax is imposed, will the typical firm earn a profit or suffer a loss? Will entry or exit occur?] c. In the long run, do both buyers and sellers share in the payment of the excise tax? Explain briefly.

Suppose that a perfectly competitive firm has the following total variable costs \((T V C)\) :$$\begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline \text { Quantity: } & \mathbf{0} & \mathbf{1} & \mathbf{2} & \mathbf{3} & \mathbf{4} & \mathbf{5} & \mathbf{6} \\\\\hline \text {TVC:} & \$ 0 & \$ 6 & \$ 11 & \$ 15 & \$ 18 & \$ 22 & \$ 28 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$,It also has total fixed costs \((T F C)\) of \(\$ 6 .\) If the market price is \(\$ 5\) per unit: a. Find the firm's profit-maximizing quantity using the marginal revenue and marginal cost approach. b. Check your results by re-solving the problem using the total revenue and total cost approach Is the firm earning a positive profit, suffering a loss, or breaking even?

A student says, "My economics professor must be confused. First he tells us that in perfect competition, the demand curve is completely flat-horizontal. But then he draws a supply and demand diagram that has a downward-sloping demand curve. What's up with that?" Resolve this student's problem in a single sentence.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free