Chapter 7: Problem 11
"If a firm has diminishing returns to labor over some range of output, it cannot have economies of scale over that range." True or false? Explain briefly.
Chapter 7: Problem 11
"If a firm has diminishing returns to labor over some range of output, it cannot have economies of scale over that range." True or false? Explain briefly.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeIn a recent year, a long, hard winter gave rise to stronger-than-normal demand for heating oil. The following summer was characterized by strong demand for gasoline by vacationers. Show what these two events might have done to the short-run \(M C, A V C,\) and \(A T C\) curves of American Airlines. (Hint: How would these events affect the price of oil and the price of jet fuel made from oil?)
In Table \(3,\) when output rises from 90 to 130 units, marginal cost is 3.00 . For this change in output, marginal cost is greater than the previous A V C 2.67 dollar but less than the previous A T C (4.22 dollar) . According to the relationship between marginals and averages you learned in this chapter: a. What should happen to \(A V C\) due to this change in output? Does it happen? b. What should happen to \(A T C\) due to this change in output? Does it happen?
Draw the long-run total cost and long-run average cost curves for a firm that experiences: a. Constant returns to scale over all output levels. b. Diseconomies of scale over low levels of output, constant returns to scale over intermediate levels of output, and economies of scale over high output levels. Does this pattern of costs make sense? Why or why not?
In mid-2009, the Obama administration announced it would cancel orders for a new fleet of presidential helicopters. About 3 dollar billion had already been spent on developing the helicopters, which had special protective and telecommunications features. But another 8 dollar billion would have been needed to complete the project and deliver the fleet. The administration suggested it might look for a less expensive design and start from scratch. Some media commentators criticized the decision, arguing that cancelling the project would mean wasting the 3 billion dollar already spent. a. Suppose that starting from scratch on a new proposal that would be just as good as the original would cost a total of \(\$ 5\) billion from beginning to end. Which would be the wiser choice sticking with the original or starting from scratch? Why? b. Would your answer change if the new proposal
A study \(^{*}\) of immunizing children in poor countries against diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus estimated that, in the long run, a \(10 \%\) increase in the number of children vaccinated increases the total cost of vaccinations by \(8.4 \% .\) According to this study: a. Is immunization over this range characterized by economies of scale, constant returns to scale, or diseconomies of scale? b. [More difficult] We can define long-run marginal cost ( \(L R M C\) ) as the cost of increasing output by one unit when all inputs can be varied (as they can be in the long run). Based on the study, ATCurrent vaccine levels, would \(L R M C\) for vaccinations be greater than, less than, or equal to long- run average total cost (LRATC)? Why? c. If we want to know what it will cost to vaccinate additional children, and we use "cost per vaccine" as given by the current \(L R A T C\), do we overestimate, underestimate, or accurately estimate the cost per additional vaccine?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.