Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

"If a firm has diminishing returns to labor over some range of output, it cannot have economies of scale over that range." True or false? Explain briefly.

Short Answer

Expert verified
False. A firm can have diminishing returns to labor over some range of output and still achieve economies of scale over that range.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Key Concepts

Diminishing returns to labor refers to a situation where, as more labor is added to the production process, the marginal product of labor decreases. On the other hand, economies of scale occur when a firm increases its scale of production and the average cost per unit of output decreases.
02

Relating Two Concepts

Now, we need to understand how these two concepts relate. Diminishing returns to labor is a concept applied in the short run when capital is fixed. It is more focused on the per unit change from increasing one factor of production, labor in this case while holding other factors constant. Meanwhile, economies of scale is a long run concept and involves all factors of production. It discusses the percentage change in input leading to a greater percentage change in output.
03

Formulating the Answer

The assertion in the exercise is false. A firm can have diminishing returns to labor over some range of output and still achieve economies of scale over that range because the scale of an entire operation is broader in scope and encompasses more variables than labor alone. While additional labor may contribute less to output, simultaneously the average cost per unit may decrease due to more efficient processes, better management, or other factors, leading to economies of scale.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a recent year, a long, hard winter gave rise to stronger-than-normal demand for heating oil. The following summer was characterized by strong demand for gasoline by vacationers. Show what these two events might have done to the short-run \(M C, A V C,\) and \(A T C\) curves of American Airlines. (Hint: How would these events affect the price of oil and the price of jet fuel made from oil?)

In Table \(3,\) when output rises from 90 to 130 units, marginal cost is 3.00 . For this change in output, marginal cost is greater than the previous A V C 2.67 dollar but less than the previous A T C (4.22 dollar) . According to the relationship between marginals and averages you learned in this chapter: a. What should happen to \(A V C\) due to this change in output? Does it happen? b. What should happen to \(A T C\) due to this change in output? Does it happen?

Draw the long-run total cost and long-run average cost curves for a firm that experiences: a. Constant returns to scale over all output levels. b. Diseconomies of scale over low levels of output, constant returns to scale over intermediate levels of output, and economies of scale over high output levels. Does this pattern of costs make sense? Why or why not?

In mid-2009, the Obama administration announced it would cancel orders for a new fleet of presidential helicopters. About 3 dollar billion had already been spent on developing the helicopters, which had special protective and telecommunications features. But another 8 dollar billion would have been needed to complete the project and deliver the fleet. The administration suggested it might look for a less expensive design and start from scratch. Some media commentators criticized the decision, arguing that cancelling the project would mean wasting the 3 billion dollar already spent. a. Suppose that starting from scratch on a new proposal that would be just as good as the original would cost a total of \(\$ 5\) billion from beginning to end. Which would be the wiser choice sticking with the original or starting from scratch? Why? b. Would your answer change if the new proposal

A study \(^{*}\) of immunizing children in poor countries against diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus estimated that, in the long run, a \(10 \%\) increase in the number of children vaccinated increases the total cost of vaccinations by \(8.4 \% .\) According to this study: a. Is immunization over this range characterized by economies of scale, constant returns to scale, or diseconomies of scale? b. [More difficult] We can define long-run marginal cost ( \(L R M C\) ) as the cost of increasing output by one unit when all inputs can be varied (as they can be in the long run). Based on the study, ATCurrent vaccine levels, would \(L R M C\) for vaccinations be greater than, less than, or equal to long- run average total cost (LRATC)? Why? c. If we want to know what it will cost to vaccinate additional children, and we use "cost per vaccine" as given by the current \(L R A T C\), do we overestimate, underestimate, or accurately estimate the cost per additional vaccine?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free