Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

When an economy is experiencing inflation, the prices of most goods and services are rising but at different rates. Imagine a simpler inflationary situation in which all prices, and all wages and incomes, are rising at the same rate, say 5 percent per year. What would happen to consumer choices in such a situation? (Hint: Think about the budget line.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In a scenario where incomes, wages, and prices are all rising at the same rate, consumer choices will stay essentially the same. This follows from the fact that their purchasing power remains constant because the cost of goods and services and their income are rising in tandem. The relative cost between different goods and services remains constant, and consequently, there's no significant shift in consumption trends.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Inflation

Inflation is a general rise in prices of goods and services over time. When inflation rate is 5 percent a year, it means that on average, every good and service is going to cost 5 percent more than they did the previous year.
02

Understand the Impact on Wages and Incomes

When all wages and incomes rise at the same rate as inflation, the nominal income increases. This means that the amount of currency you earn is more. However, as the prices of goods and services also increase at the same rate, effectively, you have the same purchasing power as before. This is because the money you earn can buy the same quantity of these more expensive goods and services.
03

How Inflation Affects Consumer's Choices

In this case, the budget line, or the set of all possible combinations of goods or services that a consumer may purchase with their available income, would stay effectively the same. This is because both the price of goods and services and the income are increasing at the same rate. Hence, the relative prices (or the price of one good in terms of another) do not change. Therefore, consumer choices would not necessarily be affected as their purchasing power remains the same. The inflation here is more nominal than real, and so, does not fundamentally alter consumer behavior.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Inflation and Budget Line
Inflation is like a tide that raises the price levels of goods and services across an economy. It's important to understand how this tide affects the consumer's budget line—the graphical representation of all possible combinations of different goods a consumer can purchase given their income. Let's visualize a seesaw with income on one end and prices on the other. If prices go up and income remains constant, the budget line shifts inwards, reducing the number of goods a consumer can afford.

However, in our simple inflation example where incomes rise by the same percentage as prices (5% in this case), the seesaw remains balanced. The budget line doesn't really shift, it merely stretches to reflect higher prices and higher income. From a numerical perspective, the figures for both costs of goods and income are higher, but their ratio remains constant. This means the consumer's buying choices remain largely unaffected because the relative cost of goods – think of it like the price of bread in terms of milk – doesn't change. Consumers can still buy the same combinations of goods with their new income as they could before inflation struck.
Nominal vs Real Income
When dissecting the impact of inflation, it's crucial to differentiate between nominal and real income. Think of nominal income as the number on your paycheque—the amount of currency you receive. It's like the score in a game, growing higher over time. In an inflationary period where your nominal income increases by, let's say, 5%, it feels like you're inching ahead in the game.

However, real income is the truth behind the score, revealing how much that paycheque is really worth in terms of purchasing power. If the prices of goods and services increase at the same rate as your nominal income, the 'real' power of your income stays the same—you don't actually get ahead. It's akin to running on a treadmill where the speed increases just as you run faster; your position remains unchanged. To truly understand whether you're getting richer or poorer, you need to look at real income, which accounts for inflation and gives a genuine sense of how much you can afford. When your real income stays constant, like in our inflation example, your financial well-being is not really improving even if the nominal number suggests otherwise.
Purchasing Power Parity
Diving deeper into the realm of inflation, we meet a critical economic principle known as purchasing power parity (PPP). PPP is a theory that suggests over time, currency exchange rates should adjust so that an identical basket of goods—or a similar set of goods and services—costs the same in different countries when measured in a common currency. This concept helps us understand inflation beyond our borders.

For example, if a pair of shoes costs \(50 in the United States and the same pair is priced at €40 in Europe, and if \)1 equals €0.8 at the time, then the purchasing power is at parity. However, if inflation impacts only one country, it can disrupt this balance. If we continue with our simple scenario where both prices of goods and nominal incomes rise at the same rate universally, PPP would still hold—the relative value or buying power across countries would remain unchanged. But if inflation rates differ, then PPP will adjust to reflect changes in purchasing power globally. Consumers and investors use PPP as a gauge to compare economic productivity and living standards between different countries, making it a valuable tool for global economic analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

[Uses the Indifference Curve Approach] a. Draw a budget line for Rafaella, who has a weekly income of \(\$ 30 .\) Assume that she buys chicken and eggs, and that chicken costs \(\$ 5\) per pound while eggs cost \(\$ 1\) each. Add an indifference curve for Rafaella that is tangent to her budget line at the combination of 4 pounds of chicken and 10 eggs. 1 b. Draw a new budget line for Rafaella, if the price of chicken falls to \(\$ 3\) per pound. Assume that \(\mathrm{Ra}\) faella views chicken and eggs as substitutes. What will happen to her chicken consumption? What will happen to her egg consumption?

[Uses the Indifference Curve Approach \(]\) Howard spends all of his income on magazines and novels. Illustrate each of the following situations on a graph, with the quantity of magazines on the vertical axis and the quantity of novels on the horizontal axis. Use two budget lines and two indifference curves on each graph. a. When the price of magazines rises, Howard buys fewer magazines and more novels. b. When Howard's income rises, he buys more magazines and more novels. c. When Howard's income rises, he buys more magazines but fewer novels.

The Smiths are a low-income family with \(\$ 10,000\) available annually to spend on food and shelter. Food costs \(\$ 2\) per unit, and shelter costs \(\$ 1\) per square foot per year. The Smiths are currently dividing the \(\$ 10,000\) equally between food and shelter. Use either the Marginal Utility Approach or Indifference Curve Approach. a. Draw their budget constraint on a diagram with food on the vertical axis and shelter on the horizontal axis. Label their current consumption choice. How much do they spend on food? On shelter? b. Suppose the price of shelter rises to \(\$ 2\) per square foot. Draw the new budget line. Can the Smiths continue to consume the same amounts of food and shelter as previously? c. In response to the increased price of shelter, the government makes available a special income supplement. The Smiths receive a cash grant of \(\$ 5,000\) that must be spent on food and shelter. Draw their new budget line and compare it to the line you derived in part \(a\). Could the Smiths consume the same combination of food and shelter as in part \(a\) ? d. With the cash grant and with shelter priced at \(\$ 2\) per square foot, will the family consume the same combination as in part \(a\) ? Why or why not?

"If a good is inferior, a rise in its price will cause people to buy more of it, thus violating the law of demand." True or false? Explain.

What would happen to the market demand curve for polyester suits, an inferior good, if consumers' incomes rose?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free