Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In \(2010,\) Apple wanted to lower the price of downloading TV shows from iTunes from \(\$ 1.99\) to \(\$ 0.99\) But Apple had to get permission from, and convince, the management of the networks with whom they share the revenue from each download. Apple argued that lowering the price would benefit both Apple and the networks. Managers at the networks disagreed, and wanted the price kept at \(\$ 1.99\) a. What did Apple believe about the price elasticity of demand for downloaded shows? b. What did the networks believe about the price elasticity of demand for downloaded shows?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Apple believed that the price elasticity of demand for downloaded shows was elastic. Their thought was that by lowering the price, it would lead to more downloads, thus increasing total revenue. \n b. The networks believed that the price elasticity of demand for downloaded shows was inelastic, assuming that decreasing the price would not result in enough increased downloads to counterbalance the loss in revenue per download.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Apple's belief

Apple believed that the demand for downloaded shows was elastic. An elastic demand is one in which the quantity demanded responds significantly to changes in price. Here, Apple believed that by lowering the price, it would lead to a higher overall download rate, hence increasing total revenue.
02

Understanding the Networks' belief

On the other hand, the networks believed that the price elasticity of demand for downloaded shows was inelastic. An inelastic demand is one where the quantity demanded does not respond significantly to changes in price. In this perspective, if the price is reduced, the total revenue from download would decrease, as they didn't believe the reduction would generate a larger download rate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The demand for bottled water in a small town is as follows: $$\begin{array}{cc} P(\text { per bottle }) & Q_{D} \text { (bottles per week) } \\ \hline \$ 1.00 & 500 \\ \$ 1.50 & 400 \\ \$ 2.00 & 300 \\ \$ 2.50 & 200 \\ \$ 3.00 & 100 \end{array}$$ a. Is this a straight-line demand curve? How do you know? b. Calculate the price elasticity of demand for bottled water for a price rise from \(\$ 1.00\) to \(\$ 1.50 .\) Is demand elastic or inelastic for this price change? c. Calculate the price elasticity of demand for a price rise from \(\$ 2.50\) to \(\$ 3.00 .\) Is demand elastic or inelastic for this price change? d. According to the chapter, demand should become less elastic as we move downward and rightward along a straight-line demand curve. Use your answers in \(b\). and \(c .\) to confirm this relationship. e. Create another column for total revenue on bottled water at each price. f. According to the chapter, a rise in price should increase total revenue on bottled water when demand is inelastic, and decrease total revenue when demand is elastic. Use your answers in \(b\). and \(c .\) and the new total revenue column you created to confirm this.

Some studies suggest that "tooth extraction" is an inferior good. Which measure of elasticity (price elasticity of demand, price elasticity of supply, income elasticity, or cross-price elasticity) would provide evidence to support this claim? What would we look for in this elasticity measure to determine if tooth extraction were inferior?

Three Guys Named Al, a moving company, is contemplating a price hike. Currently, they charge \(\$ 30\) per hour, but Al thinks they could get \(\$ 40 .\) Al disagrees, saying it will hurt the business. Al, the brains of the outfit, has calculated the price elasticity of demand for their moving services in the range from \(\$ 30\) to \(\$ 40\) and found it to be 0.5 a. Based on total revenue alone, should they do as Al suggests and raise the price? Why or why not? b. Currently, Three Guys is the only moving company in town. Al reads in the paper that several new movers are planning to set up shop there within the next year. Twelve months from now, is the demand for Three Guys' services likely to be more elastic, less elastic, or the same? Why?

Table 2 shows a short-run elasticity of demand for cigarettes. The same study suggested that the long-run elasticity of demand for cigarettes ranges from 1.0 to \(2.5 .\) Which is larger-short-run or long-run elasticity? Is this what we would expect? What adjustments might smokers be able to make in the long run that they cannot make in the short run that can explain the difference between short-run and long-run elasticities?

The Dangerous Curves box titled "Slope and Elasticity," states that when two demand curves share a point, then for a given price change and starting at that shared point demand will be more elastic along the flatter curve. Does this statement remain true if we replace the word "starting" with the word "ending"? Explain why or why not.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free