Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In a study session, one of your fellow students says, "I think our econ text book has a mistake: It shows the supply curve for housing as a vertical line, which implies that a rise in price causes no change in quantity supplied. But everyone knows that if home prices rise, construction firms will build more homes and supply them to the market. So the supply curve should be drawn with an upward slope: higher price, greater quantity supplied." Explain briefly the mistake this student is making.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The student's mistake lies in misunderstanding the nature of housing as a good. Unlike many goods, housing cannot instantly adjust to price changes due to factors such as building regulations and time constraints. Therefore, in the short run, the housing supply is rather fixed, which results in a vertical supply curve.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Supply Curve

The supply curve is a graphic representation that shows the relationship between the price of a good and the quantity of that good that the seller is willing and able to supply. Traditionally, the supply curve is drawn as upward sloping - higher price, greater quantity supplied because the supplier is willing to supply more at a higher price.
02

Clarifying the nature of the Housing Market

In housing, however, the supply curve tends to be vertical or inelastic. This is because the amount of available land and housing is relatively fixed in the short run. This means that no significant amount of new housing can be built quickly in response to changes in price because of factors such as zoning laws, time required to build, and the finite amount of available land.
03

Explaining the misconception

The student would be correct if construction could be done instantly and without limits, however reality proves otherwise. Construction firms indeed respond to higher home prices by planning to build more homes, but these homes may not hit the market until years later. Thus, in the short run, the supply of housing is pretty much fixed, hence the vertical supply curve.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Elasticity of Supply
The concept of elasticity of supply represents how responsive the quantity supplied of a good is to a change in its price. This is a crucial concept in economics because it affects how suppliers react to changes in the market. Elasticity is calculated as the percentage change in quantity supplied divided by the percentage change in price.

When the supply is elastic, a small change in price leads to a significant change in the quantity supplied. This is often the case for products that can be easily produced in larger quantities, like manufactured goods. Conversely, when the supply is inelastic, the quantity supplied changes very little with price changes. This situation arises in markets where production cannot be easily increased, often due to constraints like limited resources or technology.

In summary, the elasticity of supply is a measure that helps us understand how the supply of different goods responds to price changes, directly influencing production strategies and market dynamics.
Housing Market Supply
The housing market supply is unique compared to many other goods. One might expect, as with many products, that an increase in home prices would lead to a surge in the quantity of homes supplied. However, the housing market does not conform to this principle in the short run. Several factors contribute to this divergence.

Constraints in the Housing Market

The available land, especially in urban areas, is limited and cannot be expanded quickly. Zoning laws and regulations also play a significant role in controlling how land can be used and thus, how many houses can be built on it. Furthermore, the construction of new homes requires time and planning; it's a lengthy process that cannot be expedited in the short term simply because prices have increased.

As a result, the supply curve for housing in the short run doesn't slope upward as it does for many other goods; rather, it can appear nearly vertical, suggesting that the quantity supplied is relatively unresponsive to changes in price.
Short-Run Inelastic Supply
The phenomenon of short-run inelastic supply is evident in markets like housing. This inelasticity means that in the short term, the supply of a good is not sensitive to changes in price. In other words, even if there's a sudden surge in demand that pushes prices up, suppliers cannot immediately increase the quantity of the good they provide.

Why is Housing Supply Inelastic in the Short-Run?

For housing, the sheer complexity of constructing new buildings creates inelastic conditions. Builders can't simply ramp up production overnight. There's a substantial time lag between a rise in housing prices and the availability of new homes due to planning, obtaining permits, construction, and several other factors. During this period, the quantity supplied remains largely unchanged regardless of price increases.

Understanding the concept of short-run inelastic supply can help explain why certain markets, such as housing, don't always behave in ways our intuitive understanding of supply and demand might suggest. It's a lesson in patience and planning when it comes to market expectations and responses.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

State whether each of the following is a stock variable or a flow variable, and explain your answer briefly. a. Total farm acreage in the U.S. b. Total spending on food in China c. The total value of U.S. imports from Europe d. Worldwide iPhone sales e. The total number of parking spaces in Los Angeles f. The total value of human capital in India g. Investment in new human capital in India

[Requires appendix.] A homeowner is said to be "under water" if he or she owes more on the mortgage than the home is worth. Suppose someone bought a home for \(\$ 300,000\) with a \(\$ 60,000\) down payment, and took out a mortgage loan for the rest. A few years later, the value of the home has fallen by \(15 \%,\) but the amount owed on the home has not changed. a. In this example, how much was borrowed to buy the home? b. What was the leverage ratio when the home was first purchased? c. After the home drops in value, is the homeowner under water? d. Answer the three questions above again, this time assuming that the down payment was only \(\$ 30,000\) e. Based on your answers above, when home prices are falling, what is the general relationship between the degree of leverage on a home and the likelihood that the owner will end up "under water" on the home?

In the chapter, you learned that one way the government enforces agricultural price floors is to buy up the excess supply itself. If the government wanted to follow a similar kind of policy to enforce a price ceiling (such as rent control), and thereby prevent black market-type activity, what would it have to do? Is this a sensible solution for enforcing rent control? Briefly, why or why not?

[Requires appendix.] Suppose you buy a home for \(\$ 400,000\) with a \(\$ 100,000\) down payment and finance the rest with a home mortgage. a. Immediately after purchasing your home, before any change in price, what is the value of your equity in the home? b. Immediately after purchasing your home, before any change in price, what is your simple leverage ratio on your investment in the home? c. Now suppose that over the next three years, the price of your home has increased to \(\$ 500,000 .\) Assuming you have not borrowed any additional funds using the home as collateral, but you still owe the entire mortgage amount, what is the new value of your equity in the home? Your new simple leverage ratio? d. Evaluate the following statement: "An increase in the value of a home, with no additional borrowing, increases the degree of leverage on the investment in the home." True or false? Explain.

[Requires appendix.] Suppose, as in a previous problem, you buy a home for \(\$ 400,000\) with a down payment of \(\$ 100,000\) and take out a mortgage for the remainder. Over the next three years, the price of the home rises to \(\$ 500,000\). However, during those three years, you borrow the maximum amount you can borrow without changing the value of your home equity. Assume that, at the end of the three years, you still owe all that you have borrowed, including your original mortgage. a. How much do you borrow (beyond the mortgage) over the three years? b. What is your simple leverage ratio at the end of the three years? c. By what percentage could your home's price fall (from \(\$ 500,000\) ) before your equity in the home is wiped out?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free