Chapter 4: Problem 16
[Requires appendix.] Could any combination of home price, mortgage, or further borrowing on a home result in a simple leverage ratio of \(1 / 2 ?\) If yes, provide an example. If no, briefly explain why.
Chapter 4: Problem 16
[Requires appendix.] Could any combination of home price, mortgage, or further borrowing on a home result in a simple leverage ratio of \(1 / 2 ?\) If yes, provide an example. If no, briefly explain why.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free[Requires appendix.] Suppose, as in the previous problem, you buy a home for \(\$ 400,000\) with a down payment of \(\$ 100,000\) and take out a mortgage for the remainder. Over the next three years, the price of the home rises to \(\$ 500,000 .\) However, during those three years, you also borrow \(\$ 50,000\) in additional funds using the home as collateral (called a "home equity loan"). Assume that, at the end of the three years, you still owe the \(\$ 50,000\), as well as your original mortgage. a. What is your equity in the home at the end of the three years? b. How many times are you leveraged on your investment in the home at the end of the three years? c. By what percentage could your home's price fall (after it reaches \(\$ 500,000\) ) before your equity in the home is wiped out?
Suppose you buy a home for \(200,000,\) making a \(40,000\) down payment and taking out a mortgage for the rest. The annual interest rate on your mortgage is \(5 \%,\) which is also the interest rate you can earn when you invest your funds elsewhere. (Ignore any possible tax benefits from your mortgage, as well as commissions or fees from buying or selling a home.) a. If the price at which you could sell the home remains at \(200,000,\) what is your annual interest cost of home ownership? [Hint: Be sure to include both actual interest payments and foregone interest.] b. Suppose that, after a few years of owning, you still owe the same amount on your mortgage, but you could now sell your home for \(300,000\) If you continue to own, what is your annual interest cost now? IHint: When calculating the foregone interest component, note that if you sell your home, you'll have to pay off the mortgage.]
[Requires appendix.] Suppose, as in a previous problem, you buy a home for \(\$ 400,000\) with a down payment of \(\$ 100,000\) and take out a mortgage for the remainder. Over the next three years, the price of the home rises to \(\$ 500,000\). However, during those three years, you borrow the maximum amount you can borrow without changing the value of your home equity. Assume that, at the end of the three years, you still owe all that you have borrowed, including your original mortgage. a. How much do you borrow (beyond the mortgage) over the three years? b. What is your simple leverage ratio at the end of the three years? c. By what percentage could your home's price fall (from \(\$ 500,000\) ) before your equity in the home is wiped out?
[Requires appendix.] Suppose you buy a home for \(\$ 400,000\) with a \(\$ 100,000\) down payment and finance the rest with a home mortgage. a. Immediately after purchasing your home, before any change in price, what is the value of your equity in the home? b. Immediately after purchasing your home, before any change in price, what is your simple leverage ratio on your investment in the home? c. Now suppose that over the next three years, the price of your home has increased to \(\$ 500,000 .\) Assuming you have not borrowed any additional funds using the home as collateral, but you still owe the entire mortgage amount, what is the new value of your equity in the home? Your new simple leverage ratio? d. Evaluate the following statement: "An increase in the value of a home, with no additional borrowing, increases the degree of leverage on the investment in the home." True or false? Explain.
Every year in Houseville, California, builders construct 2,000 new homes-the most the city council will allow them to build. And every year, the demand curve for housing shifts rightward by 2,000 homes as well. Using supply and demand diagrams, illustrate how each of the following new events, ceteris paribus, would affect the price of homes in Houseville over the current year, and state whether home prices would rise or fall. a. Housevillc has just won an award for the most livable city in the United States. The publicity causes the demand curve for housing to shift rightward by 5,000 this year. b. Houseville's city council relaxes its restrictions, allowing the housing stock to risc by 3,000 during the year. c. An earthquake destroys 1,000 homes in Houseville. There is no effect on the demand for housing, and the city council continucs to allow only 2,000 new homes to be built during the year. d. The events in a., \(b_{\cdot,}\) and \(c,\) all happen at the same time.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.