Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the following forecast: "Next month, we predict that the demand for oranges will continue to increase, which will tend to raise the price of oranges. However, the higher price will increase supply, and a greater supply tends to lower prices. Accordingly, even though we predict that demand will increase next month, we cannot predict whether the price of oranges will rise or fall." There is a serious mistake of logic in this forecast. Can you find it? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The logical mistake in the forecast lies in its assumption that supply can instantly increase in response to an increase in price due to higher demand. In reality, there usually is a time delay in the ability to increase supply in response to increased prices, especially in the context of agricultural products like oranges.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the forecasting logic

In the forecast, it's predicted that demand for oranges will increase in the next month, which should naturally cause the price of oranges to increase, based on the principle of supply and demand. In economics, as demand for an item increases and supply remains unchanged, a higher equilibrium price will occur.
02

Analyzing effect of price on supply

The forecast then mentions that the higher price of oranges will increase the supply. This is based on the fact that as price increases, suppliers are more motivated to produce and sell the item to capitalize on the profit potential. A greater supply, as the forecast points out, tends to lower prices referencing again to the law of supply and demand.
03

Identifying the mistake

The mistake of logic in this forecast lies in the assumption that supply can change within the same period of increased demand. Usually, in any production cycle, there's a time lag between the identification of increased prices (and thus increased demand) and the ability to increase supply. In other words, the growers of oranges cannot instantly increase their supply in response to increased prices during the same month. An immediate reaction of supply to an increase in price is unrealistic. Therefore, the forecast should actually anticipate an increase in the price of oranges due to increased demand, at least in the immediate term. The increased supply (and possibly lower prices) might be processed later once suppliers react and produce more oranges, but not simultaneously.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Indicate which curve shifted-and in which direction-for each of the following. Assume that only one curve shifts. a. The price of furniture rises as the quantity bought and sold falls. b. Apartment vacancy rates increase while average monthly rent on apartments declines. c. The price of personal computers continues to decline as sales skyrocket.

How would each of the following affect the market for denim jeans in the United States? Illustrate each answer with a supply-and-demand diagram. a. The price of denim cloth increases. b. An economic slowdown in the United States causes household incomes to decrease.

The following table gives hypothetical data for the quantity of two-bedroom rental apartments demanded and supplied in Peoria, Illinois: $$\begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Quantity } & \text { Quantity } \\ \text { Monthly } & \text { Demanded } & \text { Supplied } \\ \text { Rent } & \text { (thousands) } & \text { (thousands) } \\ \hline \$ 800 & 30 & 10 \\ \$ 1,000 & 25 & 14 \\ \$ 1,200 & 22 & 17 \\ \$ 1,400 & 19 & 19 \\ \$ 1,600 & 17 & 21 \\ \$ 1,800 & 15 & 22 \end{array}$$ a. Graph the demand and supply curves. b. Find the equilibrium price and quantity. c. Explain bricfly why a rent of \(\$ 1,000\) cannot be the equilibrium in this market. d. Suppose a tornado destroys a significant number of apartment buildings in Peoria but doesn't affect people's desire to live there. Illustrate on your graph the effects on equilibrium price and quantity.

Consider the following statement: "In late \(2008,\) as at other times in history, oil prices came down at the same time that the quantity of oil produced fell. There-fore, one way for us to bring down oil prices is to slow down oil production." True or false? Explain.

In the late 1990 s and through \(2000,\) the British public became increasingly concerned about "Mad Cow Disease," which could be deadly to humans if they ate beef from these cattle. Fearing the disease, many consumers switched to other meats, like chicken, pork, or lamb. At the same time, the British government ordered the destruction of thousands of head of cattle. Illustrate the effects of these events on the equilibrium price and quantity in the market for British beef. Can we determine with certainty the direction of change for the quantity? For the price? Explain briefly.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free