Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Draw the relevant curves to show a monopolistic competitor suffering a loss in the short run. What will this firm do in the long run if the situation does not improve? (Assume its \(A T C\) and \(M C\) curves don't change in the long run. How would this action affect other firms in this market?

Short Answer

Expert verified
On suffering a loss in the short run, a monopolistic firm whose ATC and MC curves don't change in the long run, would likely exit from the market to curb continued losses. This exit could increase the product prices due to reduced supply, potentially flipping the loss into profit for remaining market players.

Step by step solution

01

Define and Draw Initial Curves

To start with, plot a graph with Quantity (Q) on x-axis and Price/Cost (P/C) on y-axis. Draw the downward-sloping Demand curve (D) and Marginal Revenue (MR) curve. The MR curve lies below the demand curve in monopolistic competition. Further, plot the U-shaped Average Total Cost (ATC) curve and the Marginal Cost (MC) curve which intersects ATC at its minimum point.
02

Identify Loss in Short Run

Given that the firm is suffering loss in the short run, it means that Price is less than Average Total Cost i.e., P < ATC. Draw a horizontal line corresponding to the price where MR=MC. The point where this line intersects the ATC curve represents loss per unit (ATC-P). The loss rectangle is depicted by this loss-per-unit height and the quantity sold (on the x-axis) width.
03

Actions in Long Run

In the long run, if the firm is still suffering losses, it has the potential to exit the market. This is a logical step for the firm to avoid sustained and possibly, escalated losses.
04

Impact on Other Firms

When firms exit, it reduces the overall industry supply which increases the product prices. This leads to greater demand for remaining firms, and in case their ATC and MC curves don't change, it is likely to convert their losses into profits by selling the product at higher market price hence improving their profitability.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that the government has decided to tax all the firms in a monopolistically competitive industry by levying a fixed tax on each firm; that is, the amount of the tax is the same regardless of how much output the firm produces. In the short run, how would the tax affect the price, output level, and profit of a typical firm in that industry? What would be the effect in the long run?

Draw a diagram, including demand, marginal revenue, marginal cost, and any other curves necessary, to illustrate each of the following two situations for a monopolistic competitor: a. The firm is suffering a loss, and it should shut down in the short run. b. The firm is suffering a loss, but it should stay open in the short run.

State whether each of the following is mathematically possible or impossible: a. A market has a 4 -firm concentration ratio of \(50 \%,\) and an HHI of 600 b. A market has a 4 -firm concentration ratio of \(50 \%,\) and an HHI of 3,000 c. A market has a 4 -firm concentration ratio of \(100 \%,\) and an HHI of 5,000

In a small Nevada town, Ptomaine Flats, there are only two restaurants, the Road Kill Café and, for Italian fare, Sal Monella's. Each restaurant has to decide whether to clean up its act or continue to ignore health code violations. Each restaurant currently makes \(\$ 7,000\) a year in profit. If they both tidy up a bit, they will attract more patrons but must bear the (substantial) cost of the cleanup; so they will both be left with a profit of \(\$ 5,000 .\) However, if one cleans up and the other doesn't, the influx of diners to the cleaner joint will more than cover the costs of the scrubbing; the more hygienic place ends up with \(\$ 12,000,\) and the grubbier establishment incurs a loss of \(\$ 3,000\) a. Write out the payoff matrix for this game, clearly labeling strategies and payoffs to each player. b. What is each player's dominant strategy? c. What will be the outcome of the game? Explain your answer. d. Suppose the two restaurants believe they will face the same decision repeatedly. How might the outcome differ? Why? e. Assume that if one cleans up and one stays dirty, the cleaner restaurant makes only \(\$ 6,000\) in profit. All other payoffs are the same as before. What will the outcome of the game be now without cooperation? With cooperation?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free