Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In a recent year, a long, hard winter gave rise to stronger-than-normal demand for heating oil. The following summer was characterized by strong demand for gasoline by vacationers. Show what these two events might have done to the short-run \(M C, A V C\), and \(A T C\) curves of Continental Airlines. (Hint: How would these events affect the price of oil?)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The increased demand for heating oil and gasoline, leading to raised oil prices, will cause the MC, AVC, and ATC curves of Continental Airlines to shift upward in the short-run due to increased costs for jet fuel.

Step by step solution

01

Impact on Oil Prices

First, consider the effects of the hard winter and strong summer demand for gasoline on the oil market. Both heating oil and gasoline are derivatives of crude oil. An increase in demand for both will likely cause the price of crude oil to spike upward due to the inelastic short-term supply of oil.
02

Impact on Airline Costs

Next, consider the impact of higher oil prices on Continental Airlines. Jet fuel, a significant variable cost for airlines, is also derived from crude oil. As the price of oil rises, the cost of jet fuel will also rise. This will increase both the variable and total costs for the airline.
03

Shifts in Cost Curves

Finally, consider how these cost increases translate into shifts in the cost curves. A rise in variable cost due to more expensive fuel will cause the AVC and MC curves to shift upward. Since ATC is also affected by changes in variable costs, the ATC curve will also shift upward.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cost Curves
Cost curves are vital in understanding how costs change with output in microeconomics. In particular, we look at curves like Marginal Cost (MC), Average Variable Cost (AVC), and Average Total Cost (ATC). Each curve describes a different aspect of costs.
In short, MC shows the cost of producing one more unit of output, while AVC displays the average cost of variable inputs per unit. ATC combines both fixed and variable costs averaged over all units.
  • MC Curve - Represents change in total cost from producing an additional unit.
  • AVC Curve - Shows the average of variable costs per unit of output.
  • ATC Curve - Reflects the average total cost including both fixed and variable.
When oil prices increase, these cost curves shift. Specifically, both AVC and MC rise because producing each unit now costs more due to higher input costs like fuel. Consequently, ATC rises as variable costs form a part of total costs.
Variable Costs
Variable costs are expenses that change in proportion to the level of production. These include inputs that can vary, such as fuel, materials, and labor. For airlines, fuel constitutes a substantial variable cost.
When there's a rise in oil prices, the cost of jet fuel increases. This affects the variable costs directly. As variable costs go up, so does the cost of producing one more unit, which is a direct implication on the Marginal Cost (MC) curve.
The sudden rise in variable costs will impact an airline's overall cost structure. It makes day-to-day operations significantly more expensive, especially for airlines, where fuel is a key component of cost.
  • Variable costs fluctuate with production output.
  • Jet fuel for airlines is one major variable cost.
  • High oil prices drive variable costs up, affecting profitability.
Price of Oil
Oil prices exert significant influence on the economy due to oil's role as a critical input in many industries. Its price is primarily determined by supply and demand dynamics in the market.
In this scenario, a harsh winter and an increased summer demand for gasoline spurred demand for crude oil. This heightened demand likely pushed oil prices up because short-term adjustments in oil supply are limited.
Understanding the inelasticity of oil supply in the short term is crucial. Often, oil production cannot quickly accommodate sudden spikes in demand. Hence, any surge in demand can lead to a notable price increase. This volatility affects all oil-dependent sectors, like airlines, inducing shifts in their cost structures.
  • Oil is a crucial input with extensive economic influence.
  • Prices rise when demand spikes and supply remains inelastic.
  • Sudden demand changes can cause significant cost impacts on industries reliant on oil.
Demand and Supply
The concepts of demand and supply are central to microeconomics. Demand refers to the quantity of a product or service consumers are willing to purchase at various prices, while supply covers the amount producers are willing to sell.
When the demand for heating oil rises during a harsh winter, and for gasoline during the summer vacation period, it affects the overall demand for crude oil. These seasonal changes can shift the demand curve to the right, indicating higher demand at all prices.
Since oil supply can't quickly adjust upwards due to infrastructure and investment constraints, the short-run price of oil spikes. This shift in demand and relatively static supply results in higher market prices.
  • Demand Curve - Shifts right with increased demand.
  • Supply Curve - May remain static in the short term.
  • Supply-demand imbalances drive price changes.
Factors impacting demand and supply include seasonal demands, economic conditions, and technological changes that can all influence these curves.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

"If a firm has diminishing returns to labor over some range of output, it cannot have economies of scale over that range." True or false? Explain briefly.

A study \(^{*}\) of immunizing children in poor countries against diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus estimated that, in the long run, a \(10 \%\) increase in the number of children vaccinated increases the total cost of vaccinations by \(8.4 \% .\) According to this study: a. Is immunization over this range characterized by economies of scale, constant returns to scale, or diseconomies of scale? b. [more difficult] We can define long-run marginal cost (LRMC) as the cost of increasing output by one unit when all inputs can be varied (as they can be in the long run). Based on the study, at current vaccine levels, would LRMC for vaccinations be greater than, less than, or equal to long-run average total cost (LRATC)? Why? c. If we want to know what it will cost to vaccinate additional children, and we use "cost per vaccine" as given by the current LRATC, do we overestimate, underestimate, or accurately estimate the cost per additional vaccine?

The following table shows total output (in tax returns completed per day) of the accounting firm of Hoodwink and Finagle: $$\begin{array}{cc}\text { Number of } & \text { Number of Returns } \\\\\text { Accountants } & \text { per Day } \\\\\hline 0 & 0 \\\1 & 5 \\\2 & 12 \\\3 & 17 \\\4 & 20 \\\5 & 22\end{array}$$ Assuming the quantity of capital (computers, adding machines, desks, etc.) remains constant at all output levels: a. Calculate the marginal product of each accountant. b. Over what range of employment do you see increasing returns to labor? Diminishing returns? c. Explain why \(M P L\) might behave this way in the context of an accounting firm.

In mid-2009, the Obama administration announced it would cancel orders for a new fleet of presidential helicopters. About \(\$ 3\) billion had already been spent on developing the helicopters, which had special protective and telecommunications features. But another \(\$ 8\) billion would have been needed to complete the project and deliver the fleet. The administration suggested it might look for a less expensive design and start from scratch. Some media commentators criticized the decision, arguing that cancelling the project would mean wasting the \(\$ 3\) billion already spent. a. Suppose that starting from scratch on a new proposal that would be just as good as the original would cost a total of \(\$ 5\) billion from beginning to end. Which would be the wiser choice sticking with the original or starting from scratch? Why? b. Would your answer change if the new proposal would cost a total of \(\$ 10\) billion? Why or why not?

Down On Our Luck Studios has spent \(\$ 100\) million producing an awful film, \(A\) Depressing Story About a Miserable Person. If the studio releases the film, the most cost-effective marketing plan would cost an additional \(\$ 5\) million, bringing the total amount spent to \(\$ 105\) million. Box office sales under this plan are predicted to be \(\$ 12\) million, which would be split evenly between the theaters and the studio. Additional studio revenue from video and DVD sales would be about \(\$ 2\) million. Should the studio release the film? If no, briefly explain why not. If yes, explain how it could make sense to release a film that cost \(\$ 105\) million but earns only \(\$ 12\) million.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free