Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

[Uses the Marginal Utility Approach] Now go back to the original assumptions of problem 1 (novels cost \(\$ 8,\) CDs cost \(\$ 6,\) and income is \(\$ 120\) ). Suppose that Parvez is spending \(\$ 120\) monthly on paperback novels and used CDs. For novels, \(M U / P=5 ;\) for CDs, \(M U / P=4 .\) Is he maximizing his utility? If not, should he consume (1) more novels and fewer CDs or (2) more CDs and fewer novels? Explain briefly.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, Parvez is not maximizing his utility. He should consume more novels and fewer CDs to maximize his utility.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Marginal Utility to Price Ratio

The MU (Marginal Utility) to P (Price) index is a representation of the additional satisfaction compared to the cost of one more unit of a good. It's calculated by dividing the Marginal Utility of the good by its Price. Good allocation of resources follows the rule of equating the MU/P for all goods.
02

Evaluate Marginal Utilities to Price Ratios

We know that for novels, the MU/P ratio is 5 and for CDs, the MU/P ratio is 4. In a well-allocated resource scheme, these values should be equal.
03

Comparison and Conclusion

Comparing the calculated MU/P ratios, the MU/P for novels is greater than MU/P ratio for the CDs. This implies that consuming another novel provides more utility compared to its cost than an additional CD. This concludes that Parvez is not maximizing his utility.
04

Recommendation

As the MU/P ratio for novels is greater than the MU/P for CDs, to maximize utility, Parvez should consume more novels and fewer CDs till the MU/P ratio for both the goods turn out to be equal.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Utility Maximization
Utility maximization is the idea that consumers strive to get the highest satisfaction, or "utility," from their available resources—specifically, their income. In Parvez's case, he's spending a total of $120 each month on paperback novels and used CDs. To ensure he's making the best possible use of his funds, he must look at the satisfaction he receives, or marginal utility (MU), divided by the cost for each good, known as the MU/P ratio. That's why it's important to compare these ratios for novels and CDs; they help show where he gets more "bang for his buck" from his spending.

To identify the best allocation, Parvez should ideally have the MU/P for novels equal to that of CDs. If they aren't equal, he's not maximizing his utility, meaning there might be a better way to spread his $120 to get more satisfaction. In this problem, Parvez finds the MU/P for novels (5) is greater than that for CDs (4). Hence, by adjusting his spend to buy more novels and fewer CDs until these ratios align, he can make sure he's getting the most pleasure from each dollar spent.
Resource Allocation
Resource allocation involves distributing your resources—money, time, effort—among various goods and services you want or need. The aim is always to achieve the best possible outcome, which in terms of consumer theory, is the greatest utility or satisfaction. For Parvez, this means deciding how much to spend on novels versus CDs to achieve the highest combined satisfaction.
  • When the MU/P for used CDs is lower than that for novels, it indicates CDs offer less satisfaction per dollar spent at the current consumption level.
  • By reallocating resources, Parvez could potentially increase his total utility by buying more of the item that has a higher MU/P ratio.
Comparing the novel's MU/P value of 5 and CDs' 4 reveals that his current allocation isn't optimal. Thus, adjusting his spending towards more novels and fewer CDs will better align his resource allocation with utility maximization.
Consumer Choice Theory
Consumer choice theory is a key economic principle that explores how consumers decide what to buy given their preferences and budget constraints. It considers how individuals, like Parvez, prioritize their options to achieve the highest possible satisfaction.

Parvez's decision-making process involves evaluating his options (novels vs. CDs) through the lens of marginal utility—a measure of the added satisfaction received from consuming an extra unit of a good. With a limited budget of $120, consumer choice theory suggests Parvez should spend in such a way that the marginal utility per dollar spent is the same for all goods. This ensures there is no opportunity to increase total utility without spending more.
  • When MU/P ratios are equal, no further adjustment in his spending pattern will increase his overall satisfaction.
  • It is this balancing act that defines optimal consumer choice.
The outcome for Parvez, according to consumer choice theory, indicates a shift towards consuming more novels will better meet his needs, given the MU/P ratio disparity with CDs.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

"If a good is inferior, a rise in its price will cause people to buy more of it, thus violating the law of demand." True or false? Explain.

[Uses the Marginal Utility Approach] Anita consumes both pizza and Pepsi. The following tables show the amount of utility she obtains from different amounts of these two goods: $$\begin{array}{cc} {}{\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad}{\text {Pizza }} \\ \hline \text { Quantity } & \text { Utility } \\ \hline \text { 4 slices } & 115 \\ \text { 5 slices } & 135 \\ \text { 6 slices } & 154 \\ \text { 7 slices } & 171 \end{array}$$ $$\begin{array}{cc} \quad\quad{}{} {\text { Pepsi }} \\ \hline \text { Quantity } & \text { Utility } \\ \hline 5 \text { cans } & 63 \\ 6 \text { cans } & 75 \\ 7 \text { cans } & 86 \\ 8 \text { cans } & 96 \end{array}$$ Suppose Pepsi costs \(\$ 0.50\) per can, pizza costs \(\$ 1\) per slice, and Anita has \(\$ 9\) to spend on food and drink. What combination of pizza and Pepsi will maximize her utility?

Larsen E. Pulp, head of Pulp Fiction Publishing Co., just got some bad news: The price of paper, the company's most important input, has increased. a. On a supply/demand diagram, show what will happen to the price of Pulp's output (novels). b. Explain the resulting substitution and income effects for a typical Pulp customer. For each effect, will the customer's quantity demanded increase or decrease? Be sure to state any assumptions you are making.

The Smiths are a low-income family with \(\$ 10,000\) available annually to spend on food and shelter. Food costs \(\$ 2\) per unit, and shelter costs \(\$ 1\) per square foot per year. The Smiths are currently dividing the \(\$ 10,000\) equally between food and shelter. Use either the Marginal Utility Approach or Indifference Curve Approach. a. Draw their budget constraint on a diagram with food on the vertical axis and shelter on the horizontal axis. Label their current consumption choice. How much do they spend on food? On shelter? b. Suppose the price of shelter rises to \(\$ 2\) per square foot. Draw the new budget line. Can the Smiths continue to consume the same amounts of food and shelter as previously? c. In response to the increased price of shelter, the government makes available a special income supplement. The Smiths receive a cash grant of \(\$ 5,000\) that must be spent on food and shelter. Draw their new budget line and compare it to the line you derived in part \(a\). Could the Smiths consume the same combination of food and shelter as in part \(a\) ? d. With the cash grant and with shelter priced at \(\$ 2\) per square foot, will the family consume the same combination as in part \(a\) ? Why, or why not?

Three people have the following individual demand schedules for Count Chocula cereal that show how many boxes each would purchase monthly at different prices: $$\begin{array}{cccc} \text { Price } & \text { Person 1 } & \text { Person 2 } & \text { Person 3 } \\\ \hline \$ 5.00 & 0 & 1 & 2 \\ \$ 4.50 & 0 & 2 & 3 \\ \$ 4.00 & 0 & 3 & 4 \\ \$ 3.50 & 1 & 3 & 5 \end{array}$$ a. What is the market demand schedule for this cereal? (Assume that these three people are the only buyers.) Draw the market demand curve. b. Why might the three people have different demand schedules?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free