Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A moderately risk-averse investor has 50 percent of her portfolio invested in stocks and 50 percent in risk-free Treasury bills. Show how each of the following events will affect the investor's budget line and the proportion of stocks in her portfolio:

  1. The standard deviation of the return on the stock market increases, but the expected return on the stock market remains the same.

  2. The expected return on the stock market increases, but the standard deviation of the stock market remains the same.

  3. The return on risk-free Treasury bills increases.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The budget line will become flattered, and the proportion of stocks will fall.

  2. The budget line becomes steeper, and the proportion of stocks will rise.

  3. The budget line will shift upward and become flattered. The proportion of stocks can either increase or decrease.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation for part (a)

The budget line equation is RP=Rm-Rfσmσp+Rf; Rp is the expected return on a portfolio, Rm is the expected return from investing in the stock market, Rf is the risk-free return on treasury bills, σm and σp are the stock market and portfolio standard deviations.

With the increase in standard deviation, the slope of the budget line will fall, and it will become flattered. With the given return on the portfolio, as the standard deviation rises, the stocks become riskier. Thus, the proportion of stocks in the portfolio will decrease as the stocks become riskier, and the portfolio's expected return does not change.

02

Explanation for part (b)

With the increase in expected return, the slope of the budget line becomes steeper. The stocks are more attractive when the expected return increases with no change in risk. Thus, with the increase in expected return, the proportion of stocks in the portfolio will also increase.

03

Explanation for part (c)

As the risk-free return increases, the budget line will shift upwards, and the slope of the budget line also changes; the budget line becomes flatter. The return on treasury bills increases, making it more attractive; the investors could also hold fewer treasury bills and get the same level of return.Thus, the portion of the change in the portfolio depends on the preference of the investor.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Richard is deciding whether to buy a state lottery ticket. Each ticket costs \(1, and the probability of winning payoffs is given as follows:

PROBABILITY
RETURN
.5\)0.00
.25\(1.00
.2\)2.00
.05$7.50

a. What is the expected value of Richard's payoff if he buys a lottery ticket? What is the variance?

b. Richard's nickname is "No-Risk Rick" because he is an extremely risk-averse individual. Would he buy the ticket?

c. Richard has been given 1000 lottery tickets. Discuss how you would determine the smallest amount for which he would be willing to sell all 1000 tickets.

d. In the long run, given the price of the lottery tickets and the probability/return table, what do you think the state would do about the lottery?

Suppose that two investments have the same three payoffs, but the probability associated with each payoff differs, as illustrated in the table below:

PAYOFFPROBABILITY (INVESTMENT A)PROBABILITY (INVESTMENT B)
\(3000.100.30
\)2500.800.40
$2000.100.30
  1. Find the expected return and standard deviation of each investment.

  2. Jill has the utility function U = 5I, where I denotes the payoff. Which investment will she choose?

  3. Ken has the utility function U = 51I. Which investment will he choose?

  4. Laura has the utility function U = 5I 2. Which investment will she choose?

A city is considering how much to spend to hire people to monitor its parking meters. The following information is available to the city manager:

  • Hiring each meter-monitor costs \(10,000 per year.

  • With one monitoring person hired, the probability of a driver getting a ticket each time he or she parks illegally is equal to .25.

  • With two monitors, the probability of getting a ticket is .5; with three monitors, the probability is .75; and with four, it's equal to 1.

  • With two monitors hired, the current fine for overtime parking is \)20.

  1. Assume first that all drivers are risk-neutral. What parking fine would you levy, and how many meter monitors would you hire (1, 2, 3, or 4) to achieve the current level of deterrence against illegal parking at the minimum cost?

  2. Now assume that drivers are highly risk-averse. How would your answer to (a) change?

  3. (For discussion) What if drivers could insure themselves against the risk of parking fines? Would it make good public policy to permit such insurance?

Suppose that Natasha’s utility function is given by u(I) = √110I, where I represents annual income in thousands of dollars.

a. Is Natasha risk loving, risk neutral, or risk averse? Explain.

b. Suppose that Natasha is currently earning an income of \(40,000 (I = 40) and can earn that income next year with certainty. She is offered a chance to take a new job that offers a .6 probability of earning \)44,000 and a .4 probability of earning $33,000. Should she take the new job?

c. In (b), would Natasha be willing to buy insurance to protect against the variable income associated with the new job? If so, how much would she be willing to pay for that insurance? (Hint: What is the risk premium?)

As the owner of a family farm whose wealth is \(250,000, you must choose between sitting this season out and investing last year’s earnings (\)200,000) in a safe money market fund paying 5.0 percent or planting summer corn. Planting costs \(200,000, with a six-month time to harvest. If there is rain, planting summer corn will yield \)500,000 in revenues at harvest. If there is a drought, planting will yield \(50,000 in revenues. As a third choice, you can purchase AgriCorp drought-resistant summer corn at a cost of \)250,000 that will yield \(500,000 in revenues at harvest if there is rain, and \)350,000 in revenues if there is a drought. You are risk-averse, and your preference for family wealth (W) is specified by the relationship U(W) = √W. The probability of summer drought is 0.30, while the probability of summer rain is 0.70. Which of the three options should you choose? Explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free