Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a lottery with three possible outcomes:

• \(125 will be received with probability .2

• \)100 will be received with probability .3

• $50 will be received with probability .5

a. What is the expected value of the lottery?

b. What is the variance of the outcomes?

c. What would a risk-neutral person pay to play the lottery?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The expected value of the lottery will be $80

b. The variance of the outcomes will be $975.

c. A risk-neutral person will only pay the expected value of the lottery which is $80.

Step by step solution

01

Expected value of the lottery

The expected value of the lottery will be the same as the weight of returns of their probabilities.The probabilities at each price have been given:

At the price of $125, the probability is 0.2

At the price of $100, the probability is 0.3

At the price of $50, the probability is 0.5

The expected value of the lottery will be:

EV=Px×XEV=0.2125+0.3100+0.550=25+30+25=80

The expected value of the lottery is $80.

02

Variance of the outcome

The outcome variance is the squared deviation from the mean, which is weighted by the probabilities.For finding the variance, each value should be squared and multiplied by the probability. Then all value should be summed up, and the square of the expected value should be deducted from it.

Given: Expected value = $80. The probability at a price:

125 is 0.2

100 is 0.3, and

50 is 0.5

The variance of the outcome will be:

Variance=x2p-μ2σ2=0.2125-802+0.3100-802+0.550-802=405+120+405=975

The variance of the outcome will be $975.

03

The amount that a risk-neutral person pays

A risk-neutral individual has a mindset of one who is indifferent to risk while making an investment.They won’t simply focus on the risk of the investments which they have made.

The amount that a risk-neutral person pays should be $80. A risk-neutral person always tries to avoid the risk. Their utility on expected wealth from the utility will be the expected value of the lottery that is $80.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Richard is deciding whether to buy a state lottery ticket. Each ticket costs \(1, and the probability of winning payoffs is given as follows:

PROBABILITY
RETURN
.5\)0.00
.25\(1.00
.2\)2.00
.05$7.50

a. What is the expected value of Richard's payoff if he buys a lottery ticket? What is the variance?

b. Richard's nickname is "No-Risk Rick" because he is an extremely risk-averse individual. Would he buy the ticket?

c. Richard has been given 1000 lottery tickets. Discuss how you would determine the smallest amount for which he would be willing to sell all 1000 tickets.

d. In the long run, given the price of the lottery tickets and the probability/return table, what do you think the state would do about the lottery?

Suppose that Natasha’s utility function is given by u(I) = √110I, where I represents annual income in thousands of dollars.

a. Is Natasha risk loving, risk neutral, or risk averse? Explain.

b. Suppose that Natasha is currently earning an income of 40,000(I=40)andcanearnthatincomenextyearwithcertainty.Sheisofferedachancetotakeanewjobthatoffersa.6probabilityofearning44,000 and a .4 probability of earning $33,000. Should she take the new job?

c. In (b), would Natasha be willing to buy insurance to protect against the variable income associated with the new job? If so, how much would she be willing to pay for that insurance? (Hint: What is the risk premium?)

A city is considering how much to spend to hire people to monitor its parking meters. The following information is available to the city manager:

  • Hiring each meter-monitor costs \(10,000 per year.

  • With one monitoring person hired, the probability of a driver getting a ticket each time he or she parks illegally is equal to .25.

  • With two monitors, the probability of getting a ticket is .5; with three monitors, the probability is .75; and with four, it's equal to 1.

  • With two monitors hired, the current fine for overtime parking is \)20.

  1. Assume first that all drivers are risk-neutral. What parking fine would you levy, and how many meter monitors would you hire (1, 2, 3, or 4) to achieve the current level of deterrence against illegal parking at the minimum cost?

  2. Now assume that drivers are highly risk-averse. How would your answer to (a) change?

  3. (For discussion) What if drivers could insure themselves against the risk of parking fines? Would it make good public policy to permit such insurance?

Draw a utility function over income u(I) that describes a man who is a risk lover when his income is low but risk-averse when his income is high. Can you explain why such a utility function might reasonably describe a person’s preferences?

Suppose an investor is concerned about a business choice in which there are three prospects—the probability and returns are given below:

PROBABILITY
RETURN
4\(100
3\)30
3-$30

What is the expected value of the uncertain investment? What is the variance.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free