Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The rent control agency of New York City has found that aggregate demand is QD = 160 - 8P. Quantity is measured in tens of thousands of apartments. Price, the average monthly rental rate, is measured in hundreds of dollars. The agency also noted that the increase in Q at lower P results from more three-person families coming into the city from Long Island and demanding apartments. The city’s board of realtors acknowledges that this is a good demand estimate and has shown that supply is QS = 70 + 7P.

  1. If both the agency and the board are right about demand and supply, what is the free-market price? What is the change in city population if the agency sets a maximum average monthly rent of \(300 and all those who cannot find an apartment leave the city?

  2. Suppose the agency bows to the wishes of the board and sets a rental of \)900 per month on all apartments to allow landlords a “fair” rate of return. If 50 percent of any long-run increases in apartment offerings comes from new construction, how many apartments are constructed?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The free-market price will be $600. The city population will reduce by 630,000 people.

  2. 105,000 apartments were constructed.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation for part (a)

The free-market price is calculated below:

QD = 160-8P

QS= 70+7P

D=S

160-8P = 70+7P

8P +7P = 160 - 70

15P=90

P=$6

P=$600

Thus, Q=160-8(6)

=160-48

=112

Q=1,120,000

At $600, 1,120,000 apartments are rented.

The agency set the apartment's rent for $300. The quantity demand and quantity supply of apartments at $300 are calculated below:

QD = 160-8(3)

=160-24

=136

QD = 1,360,000

QS= 70+7(3)

=70+21

=91

QS= 910,000

The current shortage is supply-wise, which means that the market cannot provide the apartments at the lower price; the change will be considered from the old equilibrium value to the new supply value. The supply of apartments falls short of the equilibrium level by 210,000 (=1,120,000-910,000).

Assume that in every apartment, three people live in a family; thus, there is a loss of 630,000 people (=210,000*3). At $300, there will be shortage of 450,000 apartments (=1,360,000-910,000). The city population will fall by 630,000 people as the number of apartments falls by 210,000 apartments, and in each apartment, 3 people are living.

02

Explanation for part (b)

At $900, the quantity demand and quantity supply of apartment will be calculated below:

QD = 160-8(9)

=160-72

=88

QD = 880,000

QS= 70+7(9)

=70+63

=133

QS= 1,330,000


The increase in supply apartments than the equilibrium level will be 210,000 (=1,330,000 – 210,000). The number of apartments were constructed will be 50% of 210,000, i.e., 105000 apartments (=0.5*210,000).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The table below shows the retail price and sales for instant coffee and roasted coffee for two years.

  1. Using these data alone, estimate the short-run price elasticity of demand for roasted coffee. Derive a linear demand curve for roasted coffee.

  2. Now estimate the short-run price elasticity of demand for instant coffee. Derive a linear demand curve for instant coffee.

  3. Which coffee has the higher short-run price elasticity of demand? Why do you think this is the case?

In 2010, Americans smoked 315 billion cigarettes, or 15.75 billion packs of cigarettes. The average retail price (including taxes) was about \(5.00 per pack. Statistical studies have shown that the price elasticity of demand is -0.4, and the price elasticity of supply is 0.5.

  1. Using this information, derive linear demand and supply curves for the cigarette market.

  2. In 1998, Americans smoked 23.5 billion packs of cigarettes, and the retail price was about \)2.00 per pack. The decline in cigarette consumption from 1998 to 2010 was due in part to greater public awareness of the health hazards from smoking, but was also due in part to the increase in price. Suppose that the entire decline was due to the increase in price. What could you deduce from that about the price elasticity of demand?

  1. In Example 2.8 (page 74), we discussed the recent decline in world demand for copper, due in part to China’s decreasing consumption. What would happen, however, if China’s demand were increasing?
  2. Using the original elasticities of demand and supply (i.e., ES = 1.5 and ED = -0.5), calculate the effect of a 20-percent increase in copper demand on the price of copper.

  3. Now calculate the effect of this increase in demand on the equilibrium quantity, Q*.

  4. As we discussed in Example 2.8, the U.S. production of copper declined between 2000 and 2003. Calculate the effect on the equilibrium price and quantity of both a 20-percent increase in copper demand(as you just did in part a) and of a 20-percent decline in copper supply.

Refer to Example 2.5 (page 59) on the market for wheat. In 1998, the total demand for U.S. wheat was Q = 3244 - 283P and the domestic supply was QS = 1944 + 207P. At the end of 1998, both Brazil and Indonesia opened their wheat markets to U.Sfarmers. Suppose that these new markets add 200 million bushels to U.S. wheat demand. What will be the free-market price of wheat and what quantity will be produced and sold by U.S. farmers?

Example 2.9 (page 76) analyzes the world oil market. Using the data given in that example:

a. Show that the short-run demand and competitive supply curves are indeed given by

D = 36.75 - 0.035P

SC= 21.85 + 0.023P

b. Show that the long-run demand and competitive supply curves are indeed given by

D = 45.5 - 0.210P

SC= 16.1 + 0.138P

c. In Example 2.9 we examined the impact on price of a disruption of oil from Saudi Arabia. Suppose that instead of a decline in supply, OPEC production increases by 2 billion barrels per year (bb/yr) because the Saudis open large new oil fields. Calculate the effect of this increase in production on the price of oil in both the short run and the long run.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free