Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A particular metal is traded in a highly competitive world market at a world price of \(9 per ounce.

Unlimited quantities are available for import into the United States at this price. The supply of this metal from domestic U.S. mines and mills can be represented by the equation QS = 2/3P, where QS is U.S. output in million ounces and P is the domestic price.

The demand for the metal in the United States is QD = 40 - 2P, where QD is the domestic demand in million ounces.

In recent years the U.S. industry has been protected by a tariff of \)9 per ounce. Under pressure from other foreign governments, the United States plans to reduce this tariff to zero. Threatened by this change, the U.S. industry is seeking a voluntary restraint agreement that would limit imports into the United States to 8 million ounces per year.

a. Under the $9 tariff, what was the U.S. domestic price of the metal?

b. If the United States eliminates the tariff and the voluntary restraint agreement is approved, what will be the U.S. domestic price of the metal?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The U.S. domestic price of the metal is $18 per ounce.

  2. The new U.S. domestic price of the metal will be $12 per ounce.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Determining the U.S. domestic price of the metal

The U.S. domestic price of the metal will be the sum of the world price and the tariff price. The domestic price of the metal is calculated below:

Priceofmetal=Worldprice+Tariff=$9+$9=$18

The domestic price of the metal in the U.S. market would be $18 per ounce.

02

Step 2. Determining the U.S. domestic price of metal after the implementation of quota policy

The quota will restrict the quantity of imports to 8 million ounces per year. Since quantity import is equivalent to the quantity of imports, the difference between the quantity demanded and quantity supplied will be the quantity of import.

Import = Quantity demanded (QD) –Quantity supplied (QS). Putting the values of import, QD, and QS, the new price after the quota policy is calculated below:

Import=QD-DS8=40-2P-23P40-8=2P+23PP=12

Thus, the new U.S. domestic price for the metal after implementing the quota policy will be $12 per pound.


Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the inverse relationship in the demand for labor curve?

Japanese rice producers have extremely high production costs, due in part to the high opportunity cost of land and to their inability to take advantage of economies of large-scale production. Analyze two policies intended to maintain Japanese rice production:

(1) a per-pound subsidy to farmers for each pound of rice produced, or

(2) a per-pound tariff on imported rice.

Illustrate with supply-and-demand diagrams the equilibrium price and quantity, domestic rice production, government revenue or deficit, and deadweight loss from each policy. Which policy is the Japanese government likely to prefer? Which policy is Japanese farmers likely to prefer?

Explain the four policies related to Privatisation.

Currently, the social security payroll tax in the United States is evenly divided between employers and employees. Employers must pay the government a tax of 6.2 percent of the wages they pay, and employees must pay 6.2 percent of the wages they receive. Suppose the tax were changed so that employers paid the full 12.4 percent and employees paid nothing. Would employees be better off?

In 1983, the Reagan administration introduced a new agricultural program called the Payment-in-Kind Program. To see how the program worked, let’s consider the wheat market:

  1. Suppose the demand function is QD = 28 - 2P and the supply function is QS = 4 + 4P, where P is the price of wheat in dollars per bushel, and Q is the quantity in billions of bushels. Find the free-market equilibrium price and quantity.

  2. Now suppose the government wants to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. However, the payment is made in wheat rather than in dollars— hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from vast government reserves accumulated from previous price support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equal to the amount that could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is now produced by farmers?How much is indirectly supplied to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?

  3. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, it would have stored or destroyed it. Do taxpayers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program create?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free