Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Some years ago, an article appeared in the New York Times about IBM’s pricing policy. The previous day,IBM had announced major price cuts on most of itssmall and medium-sized computers. The article said:

IBM probably has no choice but to cut prices periodicallyto get its customers to purchase moreand lease less. If they succeed, this could makelife more difficult for IBM’s major competitors.Outright purchases of computers are needed for ever larger IBM revenues and profits, says Morgan Stanley’s Ulric Weil in his new book, InformationSystems in the 80’s. Mr. Weil declares that IBM cannot revert to an emphasis on leasing.

a. Provide a brief but clear argument in support of the claim that IBM should try “to get its customers to purchase more and lease less.”

b. Provide a brief but clear argument against this claim.

c. What factors determine whether leasing or selling is preferable for a company like IBM? Explain briefly.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. It will increase the revenue of IBM.

  2. IBM will lose those consumers who could pay the lease price but not the total price of the computer.

  3. The knowledge of demand and consumers reservation prices for computers determine whether leasing or selling is preferable.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Argument in support of the claim

The claim states that IBM should cut prices of its computers periodically so that more consumers can afford to buy them. If IBM does this, its revenue will increase with each computer sold in the market. It can improve the demand for its computers by systematically abolishing the lease of computers to its potential consumers.

The decreased availability of computers for lease will compel consumers to purchase computers and continue their work. The decrease in the price of small and medium-sized computers will allow more consumers to buy them. Both the decisions will increase the number of computers sold by IBM in the market. The market share will increase along with the revenue.

02

Step 2. Argument against the claim

The article suggests decreased leasing of computers. If IBM decides to cancel this system, it will lose those consumers who can afford the lease price but not the buying price of computers. IBM may end up decreasing its demand in the market.

03

Step 3. Factors that will determine the preferable pricing decision

  • Knowledge of demand:Before deciding to go for a lease pricing strategy or selling strategy, IBM should try to gain all the possible knowledge regarding the demand for computers in the market. It will help the company to know about its potential consumers.

The company will be able to price discriminate between consumers with the help of 'knowledge about demand' and earn a maximum profit under different pricing policies.

  • Reservation price of consumers for computers:The company should conduct surveys and adopt several other methods to measure the reservation price of its consumers. It will help the company categorize the consumers based on their reservation prices.

It can then decide about both strategies' overall benefit (lease or sell).

The above factors will help IBM judge the preferable system of providing computers to its consumers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You are selling two goods, 1 and 2, to a market consisting of three consumers with reservation prices as follows:

RESERVATION PRICE (\()

CONSUMER FOR 1 FOR 2

A 20 100

B 60 60

C 100 20

The unit cost of each product is \)30.

a. Compute the optimal prices and profits for (i) selling the goods separately, (ii) pure bundling, and (iii) mixed bundling.

b. Which strategy would be most profitable? Why?

A monopolist is deciding how to allocate output between two geographically separated markets (East Coast and Midwest). Demand and marginal revenue for the two markets are

P1 = 15 – Q1 MR1 = 15 - 2Q1

P2 = 25 - 2Q2 MR2 = 25 - 4Q2

The monopolist’s total cost is C = 5 + 3(Q1 + Q2). What are price, output, profits, marginal revenues, and deadweight loss (i) if the monopolist can price discriminate? (ii) if the law prohibits charging different prices in the two regions?

Your firm produces two products, the demands for which are independent. Both products are produced at zero marginal cost. You face four consumers (or groups of consumers) with the following reservation prices:

CONSUMER GOOD 1(\() GOOD 2(\))

A 25 100

B 40 80

C 80 40

D 100 25

a. Consider three alternative pricing strategies: (i) selling the goods separately; (ii) pure bundling; (iii) mixed bundling. For each strategy, determine the optimal prices to be charged and the resulting profits. Which strategy would be best?

b. Now suppose that the production of each good entails a marginal cost of $30. How does this information change your answers to (a)? Why is the optimal strategy now different?

Consider a firm with monopoly power that faces the demand curve

P= 100 - 3Q+ 4A1/2

and has the total cost function

C= 4Q2 + 10Q+ A

where Ais the level of advertising expenditures, and Pand Qare price and output.

a.Find the values of A, Q, and Pthat maximize the firm’s profit.

b.Calculate the Lerner index, L = (P - MC)/P, for this firm at its profit-maximizing levels of A, Q, and P.

A cable TV company offers, in addition to its basic service, two products: a Sports Channel (Product 1) and a Movie Channel (Product 2). Subscribers to the basic service can subscribe to these additional services individually at the monthly prices P1 and P2, respectively, or they can buy the two as a bundle for the price PB, where PB 6 P1 + P2. They can also forgo the additional services and simply buy the basic service. The company’s marginal cost for these additional services is zero. Through market research, the cable company has estimated the reservation prices for these two services for a representative group of consumers in the company’s service area. These reservation prices are plotted (as x’s) in Figure 11.21, as are the prices P1, P2, and PB that the cable company is currently charging. The graph is divided into regions I, II, III, and IV.

a. Which products, if any, will be purchased by the consumers in region I? In region II? In region III? In region IV? Explain briefly.

b. Note that as drawn in the figure, the reservation prices for the Sports Channel and the Movie Channel are negatively correlated. Why would you, or why would you not, expect consumers’ reservation prices for cable TV channels to be negatively correlated?

c. The company’s vice president has said: “Because the marginal cost of providing an additional channel is zero, mixed bundling offers no advantage over pure bundling. Our profits would be just as high if we offered the Sports Channel and the

Movie Channel together as a bundle, and only as a bundle.” Do you agree or disagree? Explain why.

d. Suppose the cable company continues to use mixed bundling to sell these two services. Based on the distribution of reservation prices shown in Figure 11.21, do you think the cable company should alter any of the prices that it is now charging? If so, how?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free