Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Some years ago, an article appeared in the New York Times about IBM’s pricing policy. The previous day,IBM had announced major price cuts on most of itssmall and medium-sized computers. The article said:

IBM probably has no choice but to cut prices periodicallyto get its customers to purchase moreand lease less. If they succeed, this could makelife more difficult for IBM’s major competitors.Outright purchases of computers are needed for ever larger IBM revenues and profits, says Morgan Stanley’s Ulric Weil in his new book, InformationSystems in the 80’s. Mr. Weil declares that IBM cannot revert to an emphasis on leasing.

a. Provide a brief but clear argument in support of the claim that IBM should try “to get its customers to purchase more and lease less.”

b. Provide a brief but clear argument against this claim.

c. What factors determine whether leasing or selling is preferable for a company like IBM? Explain briefly.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. It will increase the revenue of IBM.

  2. IBM will lose those consumers who could pay the lease price but not the total price of the computer.

  3. The knowledge of demand and consumers reservation prices for computers determine whether leasing or selling is preferable.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Argument in support of the claim

The claim states that IBM should cut prices of its computers periodically so that more consumers can afford to buy them. If IBM does this, its revenue will increase with each computer sold in the market. It can improve the demand for its computers by systematically abolishing the lease of computers to its potential consumers.

The decreased availability of computers for lease will compel consumers to purchase computers and continue their work. The decrease in the price of small and medium-sized computers will allow more consumers to buy them. Both the decisions will increase the number of computers sold by IBM in the market. The market share will increase along with the revenue.

02

Step 2. Argument against the claim

The article suggests decreased leasing of computers. If IBM decides to cancel this system, it will lose those consumers who can afford the lease price but not the buying price of computers. IBM may end up decreasing its demand in the market.

03

Step 3. Factors that will determine the preferable pricing decision

  • Knowledge of demand:Before deciding to go for a lease pricing strategy or selling strategy, IBM should try to gain all the possible knowledge regarding the demand for computers in the market. It will help the company to know about its potential consumers.

The company will be able to price discriminate between consumers with the help of 'knowledge about demand' and earn a maximum profit under different pricing policies.

  • Reservation price of consumers for computers:The company should conduct surveys and adopt several other methods to measure the reservation price of its consumers. It will help the company categorize the consumers based on their reservation prices.

It can then decide about both strategies' overall benefit (lease or sell).

The above factors will help IBM judge the preferable system of providing computers to its consumers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Look again at Figure 11.12 (p. 434), which shows the reservation prices of three consumers for two goods.

Assuming that marginal production cost is zero for both goods, can the producer make the most money by selling the goods separately, by using pure bundling, or by using mixed bundling? What prices should be charged?

Look again at Figure 11.17 (p. 438). Suppose that the marginal costs c1 and c2 were zero. Show that in this case, pure bundling, not mixed bundling, is the most profitable pricing strategy. What price should be charged for the bundle? What will the firm’s profit be?

In Example 11.1 (page 422), we saw how producers of processed foods and related consumer goods use coupons as a means of price discrimination. Although coupons are widely used in the United States, that is not the case in other countries. In Germany, coupons are illegal.

  1. Does prohibiting the use of coupons in Germany make German consumers better off or worse off?

  2. Does prohibiting the use of coupons make German producers better off or worse off?

Many retail video stores offer two alternative plans for renting films:

• A two-part tariff: Pay an annual membership fee (e.g., \(40) and then pay a small fee for the daily rental of each film (e.g., \)2 per film per day).

• A straight rental fee: Pay no membership fee, but pay a higher daily rental fee (e.g., $4 per film per day).

What is the logic behind the two-part tariff in this case? Why offer the customer a choice of two plans rather than simply a two-part tariff?

As the owner of the only tennis club in an isolated wealthy community, you must decide on membership dues and fees for court time. There are two types of tennis players. “Serious” players have demand

Q1 - 10 - P

where Q1 is court hours per week and P is the fee per hour for each individual player. There are also “occasional” players with demand

Q2 = 4 - 0.25P

Assume that there are 1000 players of each type. Because you have plenty of courts, the marginal cost of court time is zero. You have fixed costs of $10,000 per week. Serious and occasional players look alike, so you must charge them the same prices.

  1. Suppose that to maintain a “professional” atmosphere, you want to limit membership to serious players. How should you set the annual membership dues and court fees (assume 52 weeks per year) to maximize profits, keeping in mind the constraint that only serious players choose to join? What would profits be (per week)?
  2. A friend tells you that you could make greater profits by encouraging both types of players to join. Is your friend right? What annual dues and court fees would maximize weekly profits? What would these profits be?
  3. Suppose that over the years, young, upwardly mobile professionals move to your community, all of whom are serious players. You believe there are now 3000 serious players and 1000 occasional players. Would it still be profitable to cater to the occasional player? What would be the profit-maximizing annual dues and court fees? What would profits be per week?
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free