Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Look again at Figure 11.17 (p. 438). Suppose that the marginal costs c1 and c2 were zero. Show that in this case, pure bundling, not mixed bundling, is the most profitable pricing strategy. What price should be charged for the bundle? What will the firm’s profit be?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The pure bundling pricing policy will provide the producer more profits than the mixed bundling pricing policy. The bundle should be priced at $100. The firm’s profit would be $400.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Compare the profits from pure bundling and mixed bundling

  • Profit under pure bundling:Under the pure bundling pricing strategy, the producer will sell a package of two goods to the consumers. It will charge a price equal to the maximum reservation price that the customer is willing to pay for the combination of both the goods. Since marginal cost is zero for both the goods, profit will be equal to the price of goods.

The producer will sell both the goods as a single package at a maximum price of $100. The diagram suggests each consumer can offer a reservation price of $100 for the package of both the goods. The producer will sell four packages and earn a total profit of $400.

  • Profit under mixed bundling:Under the mixed bundling pricing policy, the producer tries to earn maximum profit by applying a separate pricing policy for some consumers and a pure bundling pricing policy for others. The total profit will be the sum of profits earned from all the consumers.

Suppose the producer applies a mixed bundling policy for the consumers shown in the figure. In that case, it will earn maximum by applying a separate pricing policy for consumers A and D and bundling pricing policy for consumers B and C. Thus. The producer will charge $90 for Good 2 from Consumer A, $90 for Good 1 from Consumer D, and a bundling price of $100 for both the goods from Consumer B and Consumer C.

The total profit earned by the producer will be the sum of prices charged from each consumer. Thus, the total profit will be $380 (90+90+100+100).

Comparing both the pricing strategies, the pure bundling pricing policy provides more profit to the producer. Hence, the pure bundling pricing policy provides more profits to the producer in the absence of any marginal costs.

02

Step 2. Determination of prices for the bundle

It is evident that a pure bundling pricing policy will be ideal for the producer because this pricing policy provides maximum profit compared to other pricing policies. Under this policy, the producer will charge a price equal to of maximum reservation price that the consumers are willing to pay for the bundle. Since all the four consumers are willing to pay $100 for the bundle (combination of both the goods), the producer charge $100 for the bundle. Therefore, the price of the bundle would be $100.

03

Step 3. Determining the firm’s profit

Since the marginal cost of the goods is zero, the firm’s profit from each good would be the price of that good. Hence, the firm's total profit would be the sum of the price paid by Consumer A, Consumer B, Consumer C, and Consumer D for a unit of the bundle.

Since each consumer has paid the same price for the bundle, the firm's total profit would be 4×100 = $400.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You are selling two goods, 1 and 2, to a market consisting of three consumers with reservation prices as follows:

RESERVATION PRICE (\()

CONSUMER FOR 1 FOR 2

A 20 100

B 60 60

C 100 20

The unit cost of each product is \)30.

a. Compute the optimal prices and profits for (i) selling the goods separately, (ii) pure bundling, and (iii) mixed bundling.

b. Which strategy would be most profitable? Why?

Look again at Figure 11.12 (p. 434), which shows the reservation prices of three consumers for two goods.

Assuming that marginal production cost is zero for both goods, can the producer make the most money by selling the goods separately, by using pure bundling, or by using mixed bundling? What prices should be charged?

Many retail video stores offer two alternative plans for renting films:

• A two-part tariff: Pay an annual membership fee (e.g., \(40) and then pay a small fee for the daily rental of each film (e.g., \)2 per film per day).

• A straight rental fee: Pay no membership fee, but pay a higher daily rental fee (e.g., $4 per film per day).

What is the logic behind the two-part tariff in this case? Why offer the customer a choice of two plans rather than simply a two-part tariff?

Your firm produces two products, the demands for which are independent. Both products are produced at zero marginal cost. You face four consumers (or groups of consumers) with the following reservation prices:

CONSUMER GOOD 1(\() GOOD 2(\))

A 25 100

B 40 80

C 80 40

D 100 25

a. Consider three alternative pricing strategies: (i) selling the goods separately; (ii) pure bundling; (iii) mixed bundling. For each strategy, determine the optimal prices to be charged and the resulting profits. Which strategy would be best?

b. Now suppose that the production of each good entails a marginal cost of $30. How does this information change your answers to (a)? Why is the optimal strategy now different?

A cable TV company offers, in addition to its basic service, two products: a Sports Channel (Product 1) and a Movie Channel (Product 2). Subscribers to the basic service can subscribe to these additional services individually at the monthly prices P1 and P2, respectively, or they can buy the two as a bundle for the price PB, where PB 6 P1 + P2. They can also forgo the additional services and simply buy the basic service. The company’s marginal cost for these additional services is zero. Through market research, the cable company has estimated the reservation prices for these two services for a representative group of consumers in the company’s service area. These reservation prices are plotted (as x’s) in Figure 11.21, as are the prices P1, P2, and PB that the cable company is currently charging. The graph is divided into regions I, II, III, and IV.

a. Which products, if any, will be purchased by the consumers in region I? In region II? In region III? In region IV? Explain briefly.

b. Note that as drawn in the figure, the reservation prices for the Sports Channel and the Movie Channel are negatively correlated. Why would you, or why would you not, expect consumers’ reservation prices for cable TV channels to be negatively correlated?

c. The company’s vice president has said: “Because the marginal cost of providing an additional channel is zero, mixed bundling offers no advantage over pure bundling. Our profits would be just as high if we offered the Sports Channel and the

Movie Channel together as a bundle, and only as a bundle.” Do you agree or disagree? Explain why.

d. Suppose the cable company continues to use mixed bundling to sell these two services. Based on the distribution of reservation prices shown in Figure 11.21, do you think the cable company should alter any of the prices that it is now charging? If so, how?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free