Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A lemon-growing cartel consists of four orchards. Their total cost functions are

TC1 = 20 + 5Q12

TC2 = 25 + 3Q22

TC3 = 15 + 4Q32

TC4 = 20 + 6Q42

TC is in hundreds of dollars, and Q is in cartons per month picked and shipped.

  1. Tabulate total, average, and marginal costs for each firm for output levels between 1 and 5 cartons per month (i.e., for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 cartons).
  2. If the cartel decided to ship 10 cartons per month and set a price of $25 per carton, how should output be allocated among the firms?
  3. At this shipping level, which firm has the most incentive to cheat? Does any firm not have an incentive to cheat?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The tabulate total, average, and marginal cost for each firm is given below:

b. Firms 1 and 4 will produce 2 units each, and firms 2 and 3 will produce 3 units each.

c. Firm 2 has the incentive to cheat. Firm 3 and 4 have no incentive to cheat, and firm 1 is indifferent.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation for part (a)

The total cost, average and marginal cost for firm1 is calculated below:

TC1= 20 + 5Q12TCQ = 0= 20 + 502= 20ACQ=0=TCQ=200= -MCQ=0= TCn- TCn - 1= -TCQ = 1= 20 + 512= 20 + 5= 25AC =TCQ=251= 25MC = TCn- TCn - 1= 25 - 20= 5

Similarly, the total, average, and marginal costs are calculated from 0 to 5 units.

The table below shows the total cost, average cost, and marginal cost of all 4 firms.

02

Explanation for part (b)

The cartel will assign the production in such a manner that the lowest marginal cost is achieved:

Cartel Unit Assigned

Firm Assigned

MC

1

2

3

2

3

4

3

1

5

4

4

6

5

2

9

6

3

12

7

1

15

8

2

15

9

4

18

10

3

20

Thus, firms 1 and 4 will produce 2 units each, and firms 2 and 3 will produce 3 units each.

03

Explanation for part (c)

The firm whose marginal cost is lowest beyond its allocation has an incentive to cheat. Thus, firm 2 has the lowest marginal cost for producing the 4thunit than the other; also, marginal cost is lower than the price; hence, firm 2 has an incentive to cheat. The other firm has marginal cost either greater than or equal to price. Firms 3 and 4 have marginal costs greater than the price; thus, there is no incentive to cheat. Firm 1 is indifferent as its marginal cost is less than the price.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose all firms in a monopolistically competitive industry were merged into one large firm. Would that new firm produce as many different brands? Would it produce only a single brand? Explain.

Two firms compete by choosing price. Their demand functions are

Q1 = 20 - P1 + P2

and

Q2 = 20 + P1 - P2

where P1 and P2 are the prices charged by each firm, respectively, and Q1 and Q2 are the resulting demands. Note that the demand for each good depends only on the difference in prices; if the two firms colluded and set the same price, they could make that price as high as they wanted, and earn infinite profits. Marginal costs are zero.

  1. Suppose the two firms set their prices at the same time. Find the resulting Nash equilibrium. What price will each firm charge, how much will it sell, and what will its profit be? (Hint: Maximize the profit of each firm with respect to its price.)
  2. Suppose Firm 1 sets its price first and then Firm 2 sets its price. What price will each firm charge, how much will it sell, and what will its profit be?
  3. Suppose you are one of these firms and that there are three ways you could play the game: (i) Both firms set price at the same time; (ii) You set price first; or (iii) Your competitor sets price first. If you could choose among these options, which would you prefer? Explain why.

Suppose that two identical firms produce widgets and that they are the only firms in the market. Their costs are given by C1 = 60Q1 and C2 = 60Q2, where Q1 is the output of Firm 1 and Q2 the output of Firm 2. Price is determined by the following demand curve P = 300 โ€“ Q where Q = Q1 + Q2.

  1. Find the Cournot-Nash equilibrium. Calculate the profit of each firm at this equilibrium.
  2. Suppose the two firms form a cartel to maximize joint profits. How many widgets will be produced? Calculate each firmโ€™s profit.
  3. Suppose Firm 1 were the only firm in the industry. How would market output and Firm 1โ€™s profit differ from that found in part (b) above?
  4. Returning to the duopoly of part (b), suppose Firm 1 abides by the agreement, but Firm 2 cheats by increasing production. How many widgets will Firm 2 produce? What will be each firmโ€™s profits?

Two firms produce luxury sheepskin auto seat covers: Western Where (WW) and B.B.B. Sheep (BBBS). Each firm has a cost function given by

C(q) = 30q + 1.5q2

The market demand for these seat covers is represented by the inverse demand equation

P = 300 - 3Q

where Q = q1 + q2, total output.

  1. If each firm acts to maximize its profits, taking its rivalโ€™s output as given (i.e., the firms behave as Cournot oligopolists), what will be the equilibrium quantities selected by each firm? What is total output, and what is the market price? What are the profits for each firm?
  2. It occurs to the managers of WW and BBBS that they could do a lot better by colluding. If the two firms collude, what will be the profit-maximizing choice of output? The industry price? The output and the profit for each firm in this case?
  3. The managers of these firms realize that explicit agreements to collude are illegal. Each firm must decide on its own whether to produce the Cournot quantity or the cartel quantity. To aid in making the decision, the manager of WW constructs a payoff matrix like the one below. Fill in each box with the profit of WW and the profit of BBBS. Given this payoff matrix, what output strategy is each firm likely to pursue

    PROFIT PAYOFF MAXTRIX

    (WW PROFIT, BBBS PROFIT)

    BBBS

    PRODUCECOURNOT q

    PRODUCE CARTEL q

    WW

    PRODUCE COURNOT q

    PRODUCE CARTEL q

d. Suppose WW can set its output level before BBBS does. How much will WW choose to produce in this case? How much will BBBS produce? What is the market price, and what is the profit for each firm? Is WW better off by choosing its output first? Explain why or why not.

Consider two firms facing the demand curve P = 50 - 5Q, where Q = Q1 + Q2. The firmsโ€™ cost functions are C1(Q1) = 20 + 10 Q1 and C2(Q2) = 10 + 12 Q2.

  1. Suppose both firms have entered the industry. What is the joint profit-maximizing level of output? How much will each firm produce? How would your answer change if the firms have not yet entered the industry?
  2. What is each firmโ€™s equilibrium output and profit if they behave noncooperatively? Use the Cournot model. Draw the firmsโ€™ reaction curves and show the equilibrium.
  3. How much should Firm 1 be willing to pay to purchase Firm 2 if collusion is illegal but a takeover is not?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free