Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Reconsider the common resource problem given in Example 18.6. Suppose that crawfish popularity continues to increase, and that the demand curve shifts from

C = 0.401 - 0.0064F to C = 0.50 - 0.0064F. How Does this shift in demand affect the actual crawfish catch, the efficient catch, and the social cost of common access? (Hint: Use the marginal social cost and private cost curves given in the example.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

With an increase in the demand curve, that is, a shift along the demand curve, the actual crawfish catch will increase, which will deteriorate the efficiency level, increasing the social cost of common access.

Step by step solution

01

The efficient number of public televisions

From example 18.6, information regarding the marginal social cost and the marginal private cost is given. Given the new demand curve,

Demand; C=0.50-0.0064F

MSC; C=-5.645+0.6509F

MPC; C=-0.357+0.0573F

With an increase in demand, the demand curve for crawfish shifts upward at demand’, intersecting the cost curves and establishing a price at $0.50. Since both the private cost curve and the social cost curve have a positive slope.

Therefore, an additional effort must be made to increase the catch. Thus, the socially efficient catch will increase.

Now to determine the socially efficient catch, set demand equal to MSC:

MSB = MSC0.50 - 0.0064F = - 5.645 + 0.6509FF = 9.35

Now to determine the price consumers are willing to pay for this quantity, substitute Fin the demand equation:

C = 0.50 - 0.00649.35C = $ 0.44

Now to know the actual crawfish catch, equate the demand and private marginal cost:

MSB = MPC0.50 - 0.0064F = - 0.357 + 0.0573FF* = 13.45

To find out the price consumers are willing to pay at the above, substitute 13.45 or F*in the demand equation:

C = 0.50 - 0.00649.35C = $ 0.41

Notice that the MSC of producing 13.45 units will:

MSC = - 5.645 + 0.650913.45MSC = $ 3.1

Therefore, with an increase in demand at 0.50, the marginal social cost of common access will be;

9.35-13.45= 4.1(difference between the social efficient catch and actual catch)

3.11- 0.41= 2.70 (difference between willingness to pay for the social efficient catch and willingness to pay for the actual catch)

0.5×4.1×2.70=5.535

This is greater than the MSC given in the example; that is, 2,396.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A beekeeper lives adjacent to an apple orchard. The orchard owner benefits from the bees because each hive pollinates about one acre of apple trees. The orchard owner pays nothing for this service, however, because the bees come to the orchard without his having to do anything. Because there are not enough bees to pollinate the entire orchard, the orchard owner must complete the pollination by artificial means, at a cost of \(10 per acre of trees.

Beekeeping has a marginal cost MC = 10 + 5Q, whereQis the number of beehives. Each hive yields \)40 worth of honey.

a. How many beehives will the beekeeper maintain?

b. Is this the economically efficient number of hives?

c. What changes would lead to a more efficient operation?

A number of firms have located in the western portion of a town after single-family residences took up the eastern portion. Each firm produces the same product and, in the process, emits noxious fumes that adversely affect the residents of the community.

a. Why is there an externality created by the firms?

b. Do you think that private bargaining can resolve the problem? Explain.

c. How might the community determine the efficient level of air quality?

A computer programmer lobbies against copyrighting software, arguing that everyone should benefit from innovative programs written for personal computers and that exposure to a wide variety of computer programs will inspire young programmers to create even more innovative programs. Considering the marginal social benefits possibly gained by this proposal, do you agree with this position?

Medical research has shown the negative health effects of “secondhand” smoke. Recent social trends point to growing intolerance of smoking in public areas. If you're a smoker and you wish to continue smoking despite tougher anti-smoking laws, describe the effect of the following legislative proposals on your behaviour. As a result of these programs, do you, the individual smoker, benefit? Does society benefit as a whole?

a. A bill is proposed that would lower tar and nicotine levels in all cigarettes.

b. A tax is levied on each pack of cigarettes.

c. A tax is levied on each pack of cigarettes sold.

d. Smokers would be required to carry government-issued smoking permits at all times.

There are three groups in a community. Their demand curves for public television in hours of programming, T, are given respectively by

W1 = \(200 -T

W2 = \)240 - 2T

W3 = \(320 - 2T

Suppose public television is a pure public good that can be produced at a constant marginal cost of \)200per hour.

a. What is the efficient number of hours of public television?

b. How much public television would a competitive private market provide?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free