Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that Jones and Smith have each decided to allocate $1000 per year to an entertainment budget in the form of hockey games or rock concerts. They both like hockey games and rock concerts and will choose to consume positive quantities of both goods. However, they differ substantially in their preferences for these two forms of entertainment. Jones prefers hockey games to rock concerts, while Smith prefers rock concerts to hockey games.

a. Draw a set of indifference curves for Jones and a second set for Smith.

b. Using the concept of the marginal rate of substitution, explain why the two sets of curves are different from each other.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. IC for Jones:

IC for Smith:

b. The two different corner solutions give two sets of curves for Jones (indifference curve cuts y-axis and touches the budget line) and Smith (indifference curve cuts x-axis and touches the budget line).

Step by step solution

01

Jones and Smith’s indifference curves

Jones prefers hockey games to rock concerts. He will allocate $1000 for hockey games.

The above indifference curve depicts a corner solution for Jones, where he has zero allocations for a rock concert.

Smith chooses rock concerts to hockey games. He will allocate $1000 for rock concerts.

The above indifference curve depicts the corner solution for Smith, where he has zero allocations for hockey games.

02

Marginal rate of substitution and indifference curves

The consumption basket that lies on the highest indifference curve touching the budget line maximizes a consumer’s satisfaction.

The satisfaction is maximized when:

MRSHackey,Concert=PHockeyPConcert

Jones’s marginal rate of substitution will be:

MRSConcert,Hackey,=PConcertPHockey=01000

Smith’s marginal rate of substitution will be:

MRSHockey,Concert=$0$1000=0

The marginal rate of substitution calculations for Jones and Smith show that MRS becomes zero when price ratios are reversed. This means that the indifference curve is tangent to the budget line and cuts the y-axis (Hockey games) for Jones. While the indifference curve is tangent to budget line cuts x-axis (rock concert) in the case of Smith.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The utility that Meredith receives by consuming food F and clothing C is given by U(F,C) = FC. Suppose that Meredith’s income in 1990 is \(1200 and that the prices of food and clothing are \)1 per unit for each. By 2000, however, the price of food has increased to \(2 and the price of clothing to \)3. Let 100 represent the cost of living index for 1990. Calculate the ideal and the Laspeyres cost-of-living index for Meredith for 2000. (Hint: Meredith will spend equal amounts on food and clothing with these preferences.)

Janelle and Brian each plan to spend $20,000 on the styling and gas mileage features of a new car. They can each choose all styling, all gas mileage, or some combination of the two. Janelle does not care at all about styling and wants the best gas mileage possible. Brian likes both equally and wants to spend an equal amount on each. Using indifference curves and budget lines, illustrate the choice that each person will make.

Ben allocates his lunch budget between two goods, pizza, and burritos.

a. Illustrate Ben’s optimal bundle on a graph with pizza on the horizontal axis.

b. Suppose now that pizza is taxed, causing the price to increase by 20 percent. Illustrate Ben’s new optimal bundle.

c. Suppose instead that pizza is rationed at a quantity less than Ben’s desired quantity. Illustrate Ben’s new optimal bundle.

Draw indifference curves that represent the following individuals' preferences for hamburgers and soft drinks. Indicate the direction in which the individuals' satisfaction (or utility) is increasing.

a. Joe has convex indifference curves and dislikes both hamburgers and soft drinks.

b. Jane loves hamburgers and dislikes soft drinks. If she is served a soft drink, she will pour it down the drain rather than drink it.

c. Bob loves hamburgers and dislikes soft drinks. If he is served a soft drink, he will drink it to be polite.

d. Molly loves hamburgers and soft drinks, but insists on consuming exactly one soft drink for every two hamburgers that she eats.

e. Bill likes hamburgers, but neither likes nor dislikes soft drinks.

f. Mary always gets twice as much satisfaction from an extra hamburger as she does from an extra soft drink.

Consumers in Georgia pay twice as much for avocados as they do for peaches. However, avocados and peaches are the same price in California. If consumers in both states maximize utility, will the marginal rate of substitution of peaches for avocados be the same for consumers in both states? If not, which will be higher?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free