Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A computer company's cost function, which relates its average cost of production AC to its cumulative output in thousands of computers \(Q\) and its plant size in terms of thousands of computers produced per year \(q\) (within the production range of 10,000 to 50,000 computers), is given by \\[\mathrm{AC}=10-0.1 Q+0.3 q\\] a. Is there a learning-curve effect? b. Are there economies or diseconomies of scale? c. During its existence, the firm has produced a total of 40,000 computers and is producing 10,000 computers this year. Next year it plans to increase production to 12,000 computers. Will its average cost of production increase or decrease? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Yes, there is a learning-curve effect. b. There are diseconomies of scale. c. The average cost of production will decrease next year.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Learning-Curve Effect

A learning-curve effect exists if cumulative output (\(Q\)) has an influence on the average cost (\(\mathrm{AC}\)). From the cost function \(\mathrm{AC}=10-0.1Q+0.3q\), it can be seen that \(Q\) does influence the average cost. Therefore, there is a learning-curve effect.
02

Determine the Scale Economies

Economies of scale exist if an increase in plant size (\(q\)) decreases the average cost, while diseconomies of scale exist if an increase in \(q\) increases the average cost. From the cost function \(\mathrm{AC}=10-0.1Q+0.3q\), a positive coefficient on \(q\) indicates that as the plant size increases, average cost also increases. Therefore, there are diseconomies of scale.
03

Predict Change in Average Cost

Using the given cost equation \(\mathrm{AC}=10-0.1Q+0.3q\) and given that \(Q=40,000\) computers have been produced in total while 10,000 computers are being produced this year \(q=10\), the average cost this year is \(\mathrm{AC}=10-0.1(40)+0.3(10)=7\) . Next year, \(q\) will be 12 and \(Q\) will be 52 (\(40+10+2\)), the predicted average cost will be \(\mathrm{AC}=10-0.1(52)+0.3(12)=5.8\). Therefore, average cost of production will decrease next year.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Learning-Curve Effect
The learning-curve effect in microeconomics refers to the phenomenon where the average cost of production decreases as a firm accumulates experience in production over time. This can be attributed to improvements in efficiency and skill that occur naturally as workers and processes become more proficient with practice.
In our example, the company's cost function includes the term \(-0.1Q\), which shows that the cumulative output, \(Q\), directly impacts the average cost (AC). As more computers are produced, \(Q\) increases, leading to a reduction in AC. This negative coefficient on \(Q\) confirms that as production grows, the company becomes more efficient and experiences a learning-curve effect, reducing costs.
In practice, this implies that long-term production strategies are beneficial for firms aiming to cut costs through experience and learning.
Economies of Scale
Economies of scale occur when increasing production leads to a reduced average cost per unit. This typically happens when fixed costs are spread over a larger quantity of output, or when a company becomes more operationally efficient.
However, in the given cost function, we observe a positive coefficient on \(q\) (\(+0.3q\)), indicating that as the plant size grows, the average cost increases rather than decreases. This situation suggests that the company does not benefit from economies of scale in the current scenario. Instead, it experiences diseconomies of scale, where costs rise as production capacity increases. This is often due to factors such as increased complexity of operations or overutilization of resources. A firm might want to evaluate its production methods to understand the underlying causes.
Diseconomies of Scale
Diseconomies of scale represent the opposite of economies of scale, where an increase in production results in higher average costs. This can happen when a firm expands beyond its optimal capacity, leading to inefficiencies.
In our example, the \(+0.3q\) part of the cost function illustrates that as the plant size \(q\) increases, average costs also increase. This rise could stem from a variety of issues, such as management challenges, increased infrastructure maintenance, or communication overheads.
Identifying and addressing these inefficiencies is crucial for a firm experiencing diseconomies of scale, as it can hinder competitive advantage and profitability. Companies experiencing this should consider restructuring or optimizing operations to find a more cost-effective production level.
Average Cost Analysis
Average cost analysis evaluates how the average cost per unit of production behaves as output changes. It is vital for decision-making in both short and long-term business strategies.
For the given cost function, the average cost for the current year (when \(Q = 40,000\) and \(q = 10,000\)) is calculated as \(\mathrm{AC} = 10 - 0.1(40) + 0.3(10) = 7\). For the next year, with estimated \(Q = 52,000\) and \(q = 12,000\), it becomes \(\mathrm{AC} = 10 - 0.1(52) + 0.3(12) = 5.8\).
The decreasing trend from 7 to 5.8 suggests an overall reduction in average production costs, despite the firm's larger plant size next year. This could be due to the learning-curve effect outweighing the diseconomies of scale being experienced, showing the importance of understanding all contributing factors when analyzing costs.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose the economy takes a downturn, and that labor costs fall by 50 percent and are expected to stay at that level for a long time. Show graphically how this change in the relative price of labor and capital affects the firm's expansion path.

The short-run cost function of a company is given by the equation \(\mathrm{TC}=200+55 q\), where \(\mathrm{TC}\) is the total cost and \(q\) is the total quantity of output, both measured in thousands. a. What is the company's fixed cost? b. If the company produced 100,000 units of goods, what would be its average variable cost? c. What would be its marginal cost of production? d. What would be its average fixed cost? e. Suppose the company borrows money and expands its factory. Its fixed cost rises by \(\$ 50,000\), but its variable cost falls to \(\$ 45,000\) per 1000 units. The cost of interest ( \(i\) ) also enters into the equation. Each 1 -point increase in the interest rate raises costs by \(\$ 3000 .\) Write the new cost equation.

A recent issue of Business Week reported the following: During the recent auto sales slump, GM, Ford, and Chrysler decided it was cheaper to sell cars to rental companies at a loss than to lay off workers. That's because closing and reopening plants is expensive, partly because the auto makers' current union contracts obligate them to pay many workers even if they're not working. When the article discusses selling cars "at a loss," is it referring to accounting profit or economic profit? How will the two differ in this case? Explain briefly.

You manage a plant that mass-produces engines by teams of workers using assembly machines. The technology is summarized by the production function \\[q=5 K L\\] where \(q\) is the number of engines per week, \(K\) is the number of assembly machines, and \(L\) is the number of labor teams. Each assembly machine rents for \(r=\$ 10,000\) per week, and each team costs \(w=\$ 5000\) per week. Engine costs are given by the cost of labor teams and machines, plus \(\$ 2000\) per engine for raw materials. Your plant has a fixed installation of 5 assembly machines as part of its design. a. What is the cost function for your plant-namely, how much would it cost to produce \(q\) engines? What are average and marginal costs for producing \(q\) engines? How do average costs vary with output? b. How many teams are required to produce 250 engines? What is the average cost per engine? c. You are asked to make recommendations for the design of a new production facility. What capital/ labor \((K / L)\) ratio should the new plant accommodate if it wants to minimize the total cost of producing at any level of output \(q ?\)

Suppose the long-run total cost function for an industry is given by the cubic equation \(\mathrm{TC}=\mathrm{a}+\mathrm{b} q+\mathrm{c} q^{2}+\mathrm{d} q^{3}\). Show (using calculus) that this total cost function is consistent with a U-shaped average cost curve for at least some values of \(a, b, c\), and \(d\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free