Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A number of firms have located in the western portion of a town after single- family residences took up the eastern portion. Each firm produces the same product and in the process emits noxious fumes that adversely affect the residents of the community. a. Why is there an externality created by the firms? b. Do you think that private bargaining can resolve the problem? Explain. c. How might the community determine the efficient level of air quality?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The firms are creating a negative externality by emitting harmful fumes that affect the residents who didn't choose to bear this cost. Private bargaining may help but faces issues like coordination and fair representation. The community can determine the efficient air quality level by comparing the cost and benefits of different pollution levels.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Concept of Externality

An externality is a cost or benefit that affects a party who did not choose to incur that cost or benefit. In this case, the firms produce a negative externality by emitting noxious fumes as a result of their manufacturing processes which adversely affect the residents of the town.
02

Identify the Externality

The externality created by the firms is the emission of noxious fumes which affects the quality of life for the residents in the east portion of the town, without them having any choice in the matter nor any direct compensation.
03

Private Bargaining and Potential Issues

Private bargaining between the firms and the residents could potentially resolve the issue. However, this would entirely depend on the willingness and ensuring fair representation of all affected parties. Coordination between all residents could be challenging, and companies might not fully compensate for the damage done.
04

Efficient Level of Air Quality

The community might determine the efficient level of air quality by estimating the costs and benefits of different levels of pollution. Efforts should be made to reduce pollution to the point where the cost of further reductions would outweigh the benefits. This could be done through town meetings, surveys, or hiring an external environmental analyst.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Negative Externality
When a firm or individual engages in an activity that impacts others negatively without these parties being compensated, this situation results in what economists call a **negative externality**. In the given scenario, the noxious fumes emitted by the firms operating in the western part of the town exemplify such an externality. The residents living in the eastern portion face this problem firsthand, as the air quality deteriorates and affects their wellbeing without their consent or a compensatory mechanism in place.

Key aspects of negative externalities include:
  • Involuntary Impact: Residents suffer from pollution they did not consent to.
  • Lack of Direct Compensation: There is no immediate direct compensation from the firms to the residents.
  • Overlooked Costs: The social costs, such as health impacts, are not reflected in the price of the products being manufactured.
Understanding negative externalities is crucial because they often lead to overproduction and consumption in the market, thus creating inefficiencies.
Private Bargaining
Private bargaining refers to a potential solution where affected parties negotiate directly to resolve issues caused by externalities. In this context, it would involve negotiations between the western town firms and the eastern town residents to address the pollution problem. Ideally, through private bargaining, firms might agree to reduce emissions or compensate residents in some way in exchange for continuing business operations.

However, several challenges can arise during private bargaining:
  • High Transaction Costs: Organizing all affected residents to negotiate effectively might incur significant costs.
  • Coordination Issues: All residents may not have the same ability or willingness to engage in negotiations, leading to uneven representation.
  • Information Asymmetry: Firms and residents may have unequal access to information regarding the harm caused and the costs of reducing emissions.
Successful private bargaining requires transparent communication and fair representation, but these issues often make it difficult to achieve satisfactory outcomes without additional interventions.
Efficient Level of Air Quality
Determining the efficient level of air quality involves finding a balance where the benefits of cleaner air outweigh the costs of achieving it. This process requires a comprehensive assessment of both economic and social factors.

Here's how the community might approach it:
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis: Calculate the total costs of reducing emissions versus the health and environmental benefits gained from cleaner air.
  • Community Engagement: Conduct town meetings or surveys to gauge the residents' willingness to pay for improvements and their tolerance for existing pollution levels.
  • Expert Consultation: Hire environmental analysts to provide data-driven insights into optimal emission levels and feasible reduction strategies.
By aligning community preferences with scientific recommendations, the town can work towards an air quality standard that reflects the true societal costs and benefits, ensuring a more sustainable and healthy environment for everyone involved.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Georges Bank, a highly productive fishing area off New England, can be divided into two zones in terms of fish population. Zone 1 has the higher population per square mile but is subject to severe diminishing returns to fishing effort. The daily fish catch (in tons) in Zone 1 is \\[F_{1}=200\left(X_{1}\right)-2\left(X_{1}\right)^{2}\\] where \(X_{1}\) is the number of boats fishing there. Zone 2 has fewer fish per mile but is larger, and diminishing returns are less of a problem. Its daily fish catch is \\[F_{2}=100\left(X_{2}\right)-\left(X_{2}\right)^{2}\\] where \(X_{2}\) is the number of boats fishing in Zone \(2 .\) The marginal fish catch MFC in each zone can be represented as \\[\begin{array}{l} \mathrm{MFC}_{1}=200-4\left(\mathrm{X}_{1}\right) \\ \mathrm{MFC}_{2}=100-2\left(\mathrm{X}_{2}\right) \end{array}\\] There are 100 boats now licensed by the U.S. government to fish in these two zones. The fish are sold at \(\$ 100\) per ton. Total cost (capital and operating) per boat is constant at \(\$ 1000\) per day. Answer the following questions about this situation: a. If the boats are allowed to fish where they want, with no government restriction, how many will fish in each zone? What will be the gross value of the catch? b. If the U.S. government can restrict the number and distribution of the boats, how many should be allocated to each zone? What will be the gross value of the catch? Assume the total number of boats remains at 100. c. If additional fishermen want to buy boats and join the fishing fleet, should a government wishing to maximize the net value of the catch grant them licenses? Why or why not?

The market for paper in a particular region in the United States is characterized by the following demand and supply curves: \\[Q_{D}=160,000-2000 P \quad \text { and } \quad Q_{S}=40,000+2000 P\\] where \(Q_{D}\) is the quantity demanded in 100 -pound lots, \(Q_{S}\) is the quantity supplied in 100 -pound lots, and \(P\) is the price per 100 -pound lot. Currently there is no attempt to regulate the dumping of effluent into streams and rivers by the paper mills. As a result, dumping is widespread. The marginal external cost (MEC) associated with the production of paper is given by the curve \(\mathrm{MEC}=0.0006 \mathrm{Q}_{\mathrm{S}}.\) a. Calculate the output and price of paper if it is produced under competitive conditions and no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the dumping of effluent. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of paper. c. Explain why the answers you calculated in parts (a) and (b) differ.

In a market for dry cleaning, the inverse market demand function is given by \(P=100-Q,\) and the (private \()\) marginal cost of production for the aggregation of all dry-cleaning firms is given by \(\mathrm{MC}=10+Q\). Finally, the pollution generated by the dry cleaning process creates external damages given by the marginal external cost curve \(\mathrm{MEC}=Q\). a. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under competitive conditions without regulation. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of dry cleaning. c. Determine the tax that would result in a competitive market producing the socially efficient output. d. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under monopolistic conditions without regulation. e. Determine the tax that would result in a monopolistic market producing the socially efficient output. f. Assuming that no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the pollution, which market structure yields higher social welfare? Discuss.

There are three groups in a community. Their demand curves for public television in hours of programming, \(T,\) are given respectively by \\[\begin{array}{l} W_{1}=\$ 200-T \\ W_{2}=\$ 240-2 T \\ W_{3}=\$ 320-2 T \end{array}\\] Suppose public television is a pure public good that can be produced at a constant marginal cost of \(\$ 200\) per hour a. What is the efficient number of hours of public television? b. How much public television would a competitive private market provide?

Four firms located at different points on a river dump various quantities of effluent into it. The effluent adversely affects the quality of swimming for homeowners who live downstream. These people can build swimming pools to avoid swimming in the river, and the firms can purchase filters that eliminate harmful chemicals dumped in the river. As a policy adviser for a regional planning organization, how would you compare and contrast the following options for dealing with the harmful effect of the effluent: a. An equal-rate effluent fee on firms located on the river b. An equal standard per firm on the level of effluent that each can dump. c. A transferable effluent permit system in which the aggregate level of effluent is fixed and all firms receive identical permits.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free