Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider two firms facing the demand curve \(P=50-5 Q\), where \(Q=Q_{1}+Q_{2}\). The firms' cost functions are \(C_{1}\left(Q_{1}\right)=20+10 Q_{1}\) and \(C_{2}\left(Q_{2}\right)=10+12 Q_{2}\) a. Suppose both firms have entered the industry. What is the joint profit- maximizing level of output? How much will each firm produce? How would your answer change if the firms have not yet entered the industry? b. What is each firm's equilibrium output and profit if they behave noncooperatively? Use the Cournot model. Draw the firms' reaction curves and show the equilibrium. c. How much should Firm 1 be willing to pay to purchase Firm 2 if collusion is illegal but a takeover is not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The joint profit-maximizing level of output, each firm's equilibrium output, profit in a non-cooperative environment and the takeover price for Firm 1 to purchase Firm 2 are all significant in this problem. These values will vary depending on the specifics of the demand and cost functions provided.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Functions & Variables

Given, demand function \(P=50-5Q\) and cost functions \(C_{1}=20+10Q_{1}\) and \(C_{2}=10+12Q_{2}\). We also know \(Q=Q_{1}+Q_{2}\). Also, the profit for each firm can be given as \(\pi = PQ - C_{i}\) where \(i=1,2\).
02

Compute Joint Profit Maximizing Output

We need to find \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) such that joint profits are maximized. Let’s write the profit functions for each firm first:\(\pi_{1} = (50-5(Q_{1}+Q_{2}))Q_{1} - (20+10Q_{1})\) and \(\pi_{2} = (50-5(Q_{1}+Q_{2}))Q_{2} - (10+12Q_{2})\).To find the profit-maximizing quantity for each firm, we take derivative of each profit function with respect to its own quantity and set it to 0. Solve the equations to get the quantities.
03

Compute Cournot Equilibrium

Under Cournot model, the firms choose their quantity taking into account the other firm's quantity. The reaction function of a firm shows the quantity it will produce at each potential level of output of the other firm. Reacting functions are derived by solving each firm individual profit maximization problem which is similar to what we did earlier. We get equilibrium by solving the two reaction function simultaneously.
04

Computing Takeover Price

Firm 1 would be willing to pay up to the additional profits that it would receive from acquiring Firm 2. This additional profit is the difference between the joint profit when both firms are under one ownership (which we calculated earlier) and the total profit of two firms when they are operating separately (which is sum of profits calculated in above step under Cournot model).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Profit Maximization
In economics, profit maximization is the process by which firms determine the best output level and pricing to achieve maximum profitability. In the scenario presented, we have two firms sharing a demand curve given by \( P = 50 - 5Q \), where \( Q = Q_1 + Q_2 \). Firm 1 and Firm 2 have their cost functions defined as \( C_1(Q_1) = 20 + 10Q_1 \) and \( C_2(Q_2) = 10 + 12Q_2 \), respectively.

To find the joint profit-maximizing output, we compute the profit functions for both firms and take derivatives with respect to their respective quantities. This helps to determine \( Q_1 \) and \( Q_2 \) when they make joint decisions to maximize profits together. In essence, the firms need to choose outputs that maximize their collective profits by balancing revenue from sales and production costs.

This strategy depends on cooperating to equate the marginal revenue (MR) with marginal cost (MC) for both firms. By solving these equations, firms can find their combined optimal output and maintain joint profitability equilibrium while avoiding the competitive pressures when acting separately.
Reaction Curves
In the Cournot competition framework, firms react to the expected output decisions of each other. This is where the concept of reaction curves comes into play. Reaction curves illustrate how one firm adjusts its output in response to the output set by another firm.

With this numeric problem, we derive Firm 1's reaction curve by maximizing its profit while assuming Firm 2's output is constant. A similar approach is used to derive Firm 2's reaction curve. These curves are then used to determine the Cournot equilibrium, where both firms choose quantities such that neither has an incentive to unilaterally change its output.

  • The intersection of reaction curves represents equilibrium in outputs where each firm’s strategy is optimal given the strategy of the other.
  • Reaction functions can be expressed as mathematical equations, and solving these equations gives the equilibrium output levels for both firms.
Understanding reaction curves is vital, as they demonstrate how strategic interdependence affects firms' decisions in a noncooperative, competitive setting.
Takeover Strategy
A takeover strategy involves one firm seeking to acquire another to consolidate market position or enhance profitability. In scenarios where collusion is illegal, a takeover could be a legal alternative to achieving similar outcomes.

Here, Firm 1 may consider taking over Firm 2 to internalize competition and maximize profits that come from a unified strategy rather than competing. The maximum price Firm 1 should be willing to pay for Firm 2 is the added profit realized from the acquisition, which is the difference between the joint profits as one entity and the combined profits when operating separately.

  • Calculating this takeover price involves understanding both joint profits and those under Cournot competition when firms operate individually.
  • It's crucial to factor in the cost savings or additional synergies gained after merging when evaluating the worth of a takeover.
This strategy enables the firm to potentially achieve a monopoly-like status without violating anti-trust laws that ban explicit collusion.
Noncooperative Behavior
Noncooperative behavior in economic games like the Cournot model means firms choose their output levels independently to maximize individual profits without collaboration or agreements. Such behavior reflects real-world business scenarios where firms act in self-interest.

In our exercise, the firms are assumed to use noncooperative behavior under the Cournot framework. Each firm independently decides its output to maximize its profit, considering the other's production as given. This situation complicates profit maximization as neither firm can fully control the market via cooperation.

  • Firms expect the other to act similarly, resulting in a Nash equilibrium where neither can improve profit by unilaterally altering its output.
  • Noncooperative equilibrium tends to result in lower joint profits compared to cooperative strategies, yet it is stable since no firm can benefit by changing its own output alone.
Understanding noncooperative behavior is crucial in competitive markets, as it shapes strategies and outcomes of firm interactions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two firms produce luxury sheepskin auto seat covers: Western Where (WW) and B.B.B. Sheep (BBBS). Each firm has a cost function given by \\[ C(q)=30 q+1.5 q^{2} \\] The market demand for these seat covers is represented by the inverse demand equation \\[ P=300-3 Q \\] where \(Q=q_{1}+q_{2},\) total output. a. If each firm acts to maximize its profits, taking its rival's output as given (i.e., the firms behave as Cournot oligopolists), what will be the equilibrium quantities selected by each firm? What is total output, and what is the market price? What are the profits for each firm? b. It occurs to the managers of WW and BBBS that they could do a lot better by colluding. If the two firms collude, what will be the profit-maximizing choice of output? The industry price? The output and the profit for each firm in this case? c. The managers of these firms realize that explicit agreements to collude are illegal. Each firm must decide on its own whether to produce the Cournot quantity or the cartel quantity. To aid in making the decision, the manager of \(\mathrm{WW}\) constructs a payoff matrix like the one below. Fill in each box with the profit of \(\mathrm{WW}\) and the profit of BBBS. Given this payoff matrix, what output strategy is each firm likely to pursue? d. Suppose WW can set its output level before BBBS does. How much will WW choose to produce in this case? How much will BBBS produce? What is the market price, and what is the profit for each firm? Is WW better off by choosing its output first? Explain why or why not.

Suppose the market for tennis shoes has one dominant firm and five fringe firms. The market demand is \(Q=400-2 P .\) The dominant firm has a constant marginal cost of \(20 .\) The fringe firms each have a marginal cost of \(\mathrm{MC}=20+5 q\) a. Verify that the total supply curve for the five fringe firms is \(Q_{f}=P-20\) b. Find the dominant firm's demand curve. c. Find the profit-maximizing quantity produced and price charged by the dominant firm, and the quantity produced and price charged by each of the fringe firms. d. Suppose there are 10 fringe firms instead of five. How does this change your results? e. Suppose there continue to be five fringe firms but that each manages to reduce its marginal cost to \(\mathrm{MC}=20+2 q\). How does this change your results?

A lemon-growing cartel consists of four orchards. Their total cost functions are \\[ \begin{array}{l} \mathrm{TC}_{1}=20+5 Q_{1}^{2} \\ \mathrm{TC}_{2}=25+3 Q_{2}^{2} \\ \mathrm{TC}_{3}=15+4 Q_{3}^{2} \\ \mathrm{TC}_{4}=20+6 Q_{4}^{2} \end{array} \\] \(\mathrm{TC}\) is in hundreds of dollars, and \(Q\) is in cartons per month picked and shipped. a. Tabulate total, average, and marginal costs for each firm for output levels between 1 and 5 cartons per month (i.e., for \(1,2,3,4,\) and 5 cartons). b. If the cartel decided to ship 10 cartons per month and set a price of \(\$ 25\) per carton, how should output be allocated among the firms? c. At this shipping level, which firm has the most incentive to cheat? Does any firm not have an incentive to cheat?

A monopolist can produce at a constant average (and marginal) cost of \(\mathrm{AC}=\mathrm{MC}=\$ 5 .\) It faces a market demand curve given by \(Q=53-P\) a. Calculate the profit-maximizing price and quantity for this monopolist. Also calculate its profits. b. Suppose a second firm enters the market. Let \(Q_{1}\) be the output of the first firm and \(Q_{2}\) be the output of the second. Market demand is now given by \\[ Q_{1}+Q_{2}=53-P \\] Assuming that this second firm has the same costs as the first, write the profits of each firm as functions of \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) c. Suppose (as in the Cournot model) that each firm chooses its profit- maximizing level of output on the assumption that its competitor's output is fixed. Find each firm's "reaction curve" (i.e., the rule that gives its desired output in terms of its competitor's output). d. Calculate the Cournot equilibrium (i.e., the values of \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) for which each firm is doing as well as it can given its competitor's output). What are the resulting market price and profits of each firm? *e. Suppose there are \(N\) firms in the industry, all with the same constant marginal cost, \(\mathrm{MC}=\$ 5 .\) Find the Cournot equilibrium. How much will each firm produce, what will be the market price, and how much profit will each firm earn? Also, show that as N becomes large, the market price approaches the price that would prevail under perfect competition.

Two firms compete by choosing price. Their demand functions are \\[ Q_{1}=20-P_{1}+P_{2} \\] and \\[ Q_{2}=20+P_{1}-P_{2} \\] where \(P_{1}\) and \(P_{2}\) are the prices charged by each firm, respectively, and \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) are the resulting demands. Note that the demand for each good depends only on the difference in prices; if the two firms colluded and set the same price, they could make that price as high as they wanted, and earn infinite profits. Marginal costs are zero. a. Suppose the two firms set their prices at the same time. Find the resulting Nash equilibrium. What price will each firm charge, how much will it sell, and what will its profit be? (Hint: Maximize the profit of each firm with respect to its price.) b. Suppose Firm 1 sets its price first and then Firm 2 sets its price. What price will each firm charge, how much will it sell, and what will its profit be? c. Suppose you are one of these firms and that there are three ways you could play the game: (i) Both firms set price at the same time; (ii) You set price first; or (iii) Your competitor sets price first. If you could choose among these options, which would you prefer? Explain why.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free