Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose all firms in a monopolistically competitive industry were merged into one large firm. Would that new firm produce as many different brands? Would it produce only a single brand? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Post-merger, the new monopolistic entity would make strategic decisions about the number of brands to produce based on factors such as costs of production, consumer preferences, and economies of scale. It might not necessarily produce as many brands as when in monopolistic competition, nor would it necessarily produce only a single brand.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Monopolistic Competition

In a monopolistically competitive market, there are several firms, each producing slightly differentiated products. Each firm has a certain degree of market power to set prices for its branded products
02

Merger into a Single Firm

When all these firms merge into one large firm, it now has control of the entire industry as a monopolist. However, this does not necessarily mean it will continue to produce as many different brands.
03

Implications of Merger

Following the merger, the new firm could potentially limit the number of brands produced, if it finds that a fewer number of brands can still satisfy the diverse consumer preferences whilst also reducing costs.
04

Considering Economies of Scale

On the other hand, if economies of scale can be achieved in production, it could be beneficial for the new entity to continue producing multiple brands as to not lose market segments that value variety
05

Conclusion on Brand Production

The decision to produce many brands or just a single brand will depend not on the firm's monopolistic position per se, but rather on the relationship between costs, consumer preferences and economies of scale.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Brand Differentiation
In a market characterized by monopolistic competition, brand differentiation plays a crucial role. Each firm offers products that are slightly different from their competitors, allowing them to carve out a niche within the market. This differentiation can be based on various factors, such as product quality, design, features, or even marketing strategies.
A firm can command a certain level of brand loyalty and has some control over pricing because consumers perceive its products as unique. The perception of uniqueness encourages firms to maintain diversity in their offerings. Therefore, brand differentiation helps firms attract specific consumer bases that find value in the particular attributes of their goods.
In a situation where all firms in the industry merge into a single large firm, the company may reevaluate its brand strategy. The new entity might choose to cut back on the number of brands if consumer preferences can be met with fewer options. Nonetheless, maintaining a variety of differentiated brands can still be important to retain different market segments and maximize overall market coverage.
Economies of Scale
Economies of scale are economic principles that allow firms to reduce average costs by increasing production. As production scales up, the cost of producing each additional unit of a product can decrease. These cost savings can be crucial for a business's competitive positioning in the market.
When firms merge into a monopolistic entity, they often seek to exploit economies of scale. The aim is to produce goods more efficiently and at a lower cost per unit, which can lead to lower prices for consumers and higher profit margins for the firm. This makes economies of scale a motivating factor to maintain a broad product lineup under the new merged firm.
If economies of scale are significant, maintaining multiple brands could be beneficial. The firm could satisfy various consumer preferences without a substantial increase in cost, thereby retaining customer loyalty and protecting its market share. Thus, even in a monopolized market, the concept of economies of scale can justify the production of multiple product variants to cater to diverse consumer needs.
Consumer Preferences
Consumer preferences refer to the varied tastes and desires of individuals in a market. These preferences can be influenced by cultural, personal, and psychological factors. In monopolistic competition, firms thrive by meeting these diverse consumer needs through differentiated products.
Following a merger into a single large firm, understanding consumer preferences becomes crucial. The merged entity must analyze whether existing product variations cater effectively to the audience. If most consumer needs can be fulfilled with fewer brands, the firm might consolidate its offerings.
However, consumer preferences are often diverse and dynamic, necessitating a continuous assessment of the product portfolio. By catering to these varied preferences, the firm can enhance customer satisfaction and loyalty, which are vital for long-term success.
In conclusion, adapting to consumer preferences is essential, as it can dictate the number of brands and variety of products the newly formed monopolistic entity decides to offer.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The dominant firm model can help us understand the behavior of some cartels. Let's apply this model to the OPEC oil cartel. We will use isoelastic curves to describe world demand \(W\) and noncartel (competitive supply \(S\). Reasonable numbers for the price elasticities of world demand and noncartel supply are \(-1 / 2\) and \(1 / 2,\) respectively. Then, expressing \(W\) and \(S\) in millions of barrels per day \((\mathrm{mb} / \mathrm{d}),\) we could write \\[ W=160 P^{-1 / 2} \\] and \\[ S=\left(3 \frac{1}{3}\right) P^{1 / 2} \\] Note that OPEC's net demand is \(D=W-S\) a. Draw the world demand curve \(W\), the non-OPEC supply curve \(S,\) OPEC's net demand curve \(D,\) and OPEC's marginal revenue curve. For purposes of approximation, assume OPEC's production cost is zero. Indicate OPEC's optimal price, OPEC's optimal production, and non-OPEC production on the diagram. Now, show on the diagram how the various curves will shift and how OPEC's optimal price will change if non-OPEC supply becomes more expensive because reserves of oil start running out. b. Calculate OPEC's optimal (profit-maximizing) price. (Hint: Because OPEC's cost is zero, just write the expression for OPEC revenue and find the price that maximizes it.) c. Suppose the oil-consuming countries were to unite and form a "buyers' cartel" to gain monopsony power. What can we say, and what can't we say, about the impact this action would have on price?

Suppose that two competing firms, \(A\) and \(B\), produce a homogeneous good. Both firms have a marginal cost of \(\mathrm{MC}=\$ 50 .\) Describe what would happen to output and price in each of the following situations if the firms are at (i) Cournot equilibrium, (ii) collusive equilibrium, and (iii) Bertrand equilibrium. a. Because Firm \(A\) must increase wages, its \(\mathrm{MC}\) increases to \(\$ 80\). b. The marginal cost of both firms increases. c. The demand curve shifts to the right.

Two firms produce luxury sheepskin auto seat covers: Western Where (WW) and B.B.B. Sheep (BBBS). Each firm has a cost function given by \\[ C(q)=30 q+1.5 q^{2} \\] The market demand for these seat covers is represented by the inverse demand equation \\[ P=300-3 Q \\] where \(Q=q_{1}+q_{2},\) total output. a. If each firm acts to maximize its profits, taking its rival's output as given (i.e., the firms behave as Cournot oligopolists), what will be the equilibrium quantities selected by each firm? What is total output, and what is the market price? What are the profits for each firm? b. It occurs to the managers of WW and BBBS that they could do a lot better by colluding. If the two firms collude, what will be the profit-maximizing choice of output? The industry price? The output and the profit for each firm in this case? c. The managers of these firms realize that explicit agreements to collude are illegal. Each firm must decide on its own whether to produce the Cournot quantity or the cartel quantity. To aid in making the decision, the manager of \(\mathrm{WW}\) constructs a payoff matrix like the one below. Fill in each box with the profit of \(\mathrm{WW}\) and the profit of BBBS. Given this payoff matrix, what output strategy is each firm likely to pursue? d. Suppose WW can set its output level before BBBS does. How much will WW choose to produce in this case? How much will BBBS produce? What is the market price, and what is the profit for each firm? Is WW better off by choosing its output first? Explain why or why not.

Suppose the airline industry consisted of only two firms: American and Texas Air Corp. Let the two firms have identical cost functions, \(C(q)=40 q\). Assume that the demand curve for the industry is given by \(P=100-Q\) and that each firm expects the other to behave as a Cournot competitor. a. Calculate the Cournot-Nash equilibrium for each firm, assuming that each chooses the output level that maximizes its profits when taking its rival's output as given. What are the profits of each firm? b. What would be the equilibrium quantity if Texas Air had constant marginal and average costs of \(\$ 25\) and American had constant marginal and average costs of \(\$ 40 ?\) c. Assuming that both firms have the original cost function, \(C(q)=40 q,\) how much should Texas Air be willing to invest to lower its marginal cost from 40 to \(25,\) assuming that American will not follow suit? How much should American be willing to spend to reduce its marginal cost to \(25,\) assuming that Texas Air will have marginal costs of 25 regardless of American's actions?

Two firms compete in selling identical widgets. They choose their output levels \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) simultaneously and face the demand curve \\[ P=30-Q \\] where \(Q=Q_{1}+Q_{2}\). Until recently, both firms had zero marginal costs. Recent environmental regulations have increased Firm 2 's marginal cost to \(\$ 15 .\) Firm 1 's marginal cost remains constant at zero. True or false: As a result, the market price will rise to the monopoly level.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free