Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A monopolist is deciding how to allocate output between two geographically separated markets (East Coast and Midwest). Demand and marginal revenue for the two markets are $$\begin{array}{ll} P_{1}=15-Q_{1} & \mathrm{MR}_{1}=15-2 Q_{1} \\\P_{2}=25-2 Q_{2} & \mathrm{MR}_{2}=25-4 Q_{2}\end{array}$$ The monopolist's total cost is \(C=5+3\left(Q_{1}+Q_{2}\right)\) What are price, output, profits, marginal revenues, and deadweight loss (i) if the monopolist can price discriminate? (ii) if the law prohibits charging different prices in the two regions?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Under price discrimination: \( Q_1 = 6, Q_2 = 5.5, P_1 = 9, P_2 = 14, Profit1 and Profit2 are calculated by subtracting costs from revenues, and Deadweight loss is 0 \). If price discrimination is prohibited, we calculate \( Q_1, Q_2, P, Profit1, Profit2 \) and the deadweight loss using similar mathematical processes as used in the first part of this problem.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the monopolist's output in each market under price discrimination

Under price discrimination, the monopolist will set marginal cost equal to marginal revenue in each market. So, \[ MC = MR_1 = MR_2 \] Using the given cost function \(C = 5 + 3(Q_1 + Q_2) \), we can calculate marginal cost \(MC = dC/dQ = 3 \). Setting \(MC = MR_1 \) and \(MC = MR_2 \) we have \( 15 - 2Q_1 = 3 \) and \( 25 - 4Q_2 = 3 \), solving these we get \( Q_1 = 6 \) and \( Q_2 = 5.5 \)
02

Calculate the monopolist's price in each market under price discrimination

Under price discrimination, the monopolist charges the maximum price consumers are willing to pay in each market. Using demand equations: \(P_1 = 15 - Q_1 \) and \(P_2 = 25 - 2Q_2 \), we can substitute our previously found quantity values to calculate the prices. Therefore, the monopolist's price in each market under price discrimination is \( P_1 = 9 \) and \( P_2 = 14 \)
03

Calculate the monopolist's profits and deadweight loss under price discrimination

Under price discrimination, the monopolist maximizes his profits. To find profits, we subtract total costs from total revenue. Total revenue is simply quantity times price and total cost can be calculated using cost function. Profit_1 = \( P_1*Q_1 - C_1 \) and Profit_2 = \( P_2*Q_2 - C_2 \). Since there is perfect price discrimination, there is no deadweight loss. The monopolist absorbs all consumer surplus, ensuring allocative efficiency.
04

Calculate the monopolist's output, price, profits and deadweight loss if charging different prices is prohibited

If the monopolist is prohibited from price discrimination, he will have to set one price for both markets. This price can be found by setting the sum of the marginal revenue of the two markets equal to marginal cost. Summing up \( MR_1 + MR_2 = MC \), gives us \( (15 - 2Q_1) + (25 - 4Q_2) = 3 \). Solving for Q_1 and Q_2, then substituting these quantities into our demand functions gives us the common price. We can then use similar mathematical reasoning as in Step 3 to calculate this monopolist's profits and the deadweight loss.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Marginal Revenue
Marginal revenue is the additional income generated from the sale of one more unit of a good or service. It is a crucial concept for monopolies as it guides their pricing and output decisions. A monopolist seeking to maximize profits will continue producing until marginal revenue equals marginal cost. If the marginal revenue from selling an additional unit is greater than the marginal cost of producing it, the firm will increase its output. Conversely, if the marginal cost exceeds the marginal revenue, this signals the firm should decrease its production.

In the example, the marginal revenue functions for each market where the monopolist sells its product are given by \( \mathrm{MR}_{1}=15-2 Q_{1} \) for the East Coast market and \( \mathrm{MR}_{2}=25-4 Q_{2} \) for the Midwest market. To maximize profits, the monopolist sets these equal to the marginal cost, allowing for the determination of optimal output levels for each market when price discrimination is possible.
Marginal Cost
Marginal cost is the cost incurred by producing one additional unit of a product. It's vital for understanding monopolies because it informs the decision of how much to produce. The ideal output level, from the perspective of profit maximization, is where marginal cost equals marginal revenue. A monopoly can use this rule to determine the price it should charge in different markets, especially if it can engage in price discrimination.

In the presented problem, the total cost of production is \( C=5+3(Q_{1}+Q_{2}) \) which yields a constant marginal cost of \( MC = 3 \) for additional units. This simplicity allows the monopolist to directly equate marginal cost with the marginal revenue in each market to identify the profit-maximizing quantity to produce.
Deadweight Loss
Deadweight loss refers to the loss of economic efficiency when the equilibrium for a good or service is not achievable or not achieved. In the context of monopolies, deadweight loss occurs when a monopolist sets a price above marginal cost, resulting in reduced quantity sold compared to a perfectly competitive market. The consequence is potential trades that would have benefited both the buyer and the seller do not take place, creating a loss to society.

In the case of perfect price discrimination, the monopolist captures all consumer surplus, which normally would create a deadweight loss, but because every unit is sold at the buyer's maximum willingness to pay without exceeding the marginal cost, allocative efficiency is preserved, and deadweight loss is theoretically eliminated. However, in scenarios where the monopolist cannot price discriminate, a deadweight loss may arise, as the single price set may exceed the marginal cost for some consumers, preventing mutually beneficial transactions.
Allocative Efficiency
Allocative efficiency occurs in a market when the price of the good or service reflects the marginal cost of production. This ensures that resources are distributed in a way that maximizes total consumer and producer surplus. In the context of a monopoly, allocative efficiency means that the monopolist is producing and selling the quantity of goods at a price equal to the marginal cost.

However, monopolies typically do not operate efficiently, since they can restrict output to raise prices and increase their profits. If the monopolist can perfectly price discriminate, they can achieve allocative efficiency by setting prices equal to what each consumer is willing to pay, right up to the point where price equals marginal cost. When price discrimination is not possible, the monopolist produces less and charges a higher price than what is socially optimal, leading to allocative inefficiency and deadweight loss. This is demonstrated in the step-by-step solution, where if the monopolist is not allowed to price discriminate, there will be a single price and quantity that do not necessarily reflect allocative efficiency.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sal's satellite company broadcasts TV to subscribers in Los Angeles and New York. The demand functions for each of these two groups are $$\begin{array}{l}Q_{N Y}=60-0.25 P_{N Y} \\\Q_{L A}=100-0.50 P_{L A}\end{array}$$ where \(Q\) is in thousands of subscriptions per year and \(P\) is the subscription price per year. The cost of providing \(Q\) units of service is given by $$C=1000+40 Q$$ where \(Q=Q_{\mathrm{NY}}+Q_{\mathrm{LA}}\) a. What are the profit-maximizing prices and quantities for the New York and Los Angeles markets? b. As a consequence of a new satellite that the Pentagon recently deployed, people in Los Angeles receive Sal's New York broadcasts and people in New York receive Sal's Los Angeles broadcasts. As a result, anyone in New York or Los Angeles can receive Sal's broadcasts by subscribing in either city. Thus Sal can charge only a single price. What price should he charge, and what quantities will he sell in New York and Los Angeles? c. In which of the above situations, (a) or (b), is Sal better off? In terms of consumer surplus, which situation do people in New York prefer and which do people in Los Angeles prefer? Why?

Elizabeth Airlines (EA) flies only one route: ChicagoHonolulu. The demand for each flight is \(Q=500-P\) EA's cost of running each flight is \(\$ 30,000\) plus \(\$ 100\) per passenger. a. What is the profit-maximizing price that EA will charge? How many people will be on each flight? What is EA's profit for each flight? b. EA learns that the fixed costs per flight are in fact \(\$ 41,000\) instead of \(\$ 30,000 .\) Will the airline stay in business for long? Illustrate your answer using a graph of the demand curve that EA faces, EA's average cost curve when fixed costs are \(\$ 30,000,\) and \(\mathrm{EA}^{\prime}\) s average cost curve when fixed costs are \(\$ 41,000\) c. Wait! EA finds out that two different types of people fly to Honolulu. Type \(A\) consists of business people with a demand of \(Q_{A}=260-0.4 P\). Type \(B\) consists of students whose total demand is \(Q_{B}=240-0.6 P\) Because the students are easy to spot, EA decides to charge them different prices. Graph each of these demand curves and their horizontal sum. What price does EA charge the students? What price does it charge other customers? How many of each type are on each flight? d. What would EA's profit be for each flight? Would the airline stay in business? Calculate the consumer surplus of each consumer group. What is the total consumer surplus? e. Before EA started price discriminating, how much consumer surplus was the Type \(A\) demand getting from air travel to Honolulu? Type \(B\) ? Why did total consumer surplus decline with price discrimination, even though total quantity sold remained unchanged?

If the demand for drive-in movies is more elastic for couples than for single individuals, it will be optimal for theaters to charge one admission fee for the driver of the car and an extra fee for passengers. True or false? Explain.

Some years ago, an article appeared in the New York Times about IBM's pricing policy. The previous day, IBM had announced major price cuts on most of its small and medium-sized computers. The article said: IBM probably has no choice but to cut prices periodically to get its customers to purchase more and lease less. If they succeed, this could make life more difficult for IBM's major competitors. Outright purchases of computers are needed for ever larger IBM revenues and profits, says Morgan Stanley's Ulric Weil in his new book, Information Systems in the \(80^{\prime}\) s. Mr. Weil declares that IBM cannot revert to an emphasis on leasing. a. Provide a brief but clear argument in support of the claim that IBM should try "to get its customers to purchase more and lease less." b. Provide a brief but clear argument against this claim. c. What factors determine whether leasing or selling is preferable for a company like IBM? Explain briefly.

Suppose that BMW can produce any quantity of cars at a constant marginal cost equal to \(\$ 20,000\) and a fixed cost of \(\$ 10\) billion. You are asked to advise the CEO as to what prices and quantities BMW should set for sales in Europe and in the United States. The demand for BMWs in each market is given by $$Q_{E}=4,000,000-100 P_{E}$$ and $$Q_{u}=1,000,000-20 P_{u}$$ where the subscript \(E\) denotes Europe, the subscript \(U\) denotes the United States. Assume that BMW can restrict U.S. sales to authorized BMW dealers only. a. What quantity of BMWs should the firm sell in each market, and what should the price be in each market? What should the total profit be? b. If \(\mathrm{BMW}\) were forced to charge the same price in each market, what would be the quantity sold in each market, the equilibrium price, and the company's profit?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free