Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

There are 10 households in Lake Wobegon, Minnesota, each with a demand for electricity of \(Q=50-P\) Lake Wobegon Electric's (LWE) cost of producing electricity is \(\mathrm{TC}=500+\mathrm{Q}\) a. If the regulators of LWE want to make sure that there is no deadweight loss in this market, what price will they force LWE to charge? What will output be in that case? Calculate consumer surplus and LWE's profit with that price. b. If regulators want to ensure that LWE doesn't lose money, what is the lowest price they can impose? Calculate output, consumer surplus, and profit. Is there any deadweight loss? c. Kristina knows that deadweight loss is something that this small town can do without. She suggests that each household be required to pay a fixed amount just to receive any electricity at all, and then a per-unit charge for electricity. Then LWE can break even while charging the price calculated in part (a). What fixed amount would each household have to pay for Kristina's plan to work? Why can you be sure that no household will choose instead to refuse the payment and go without electricity?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The price for no deadweight loss is $25, with an output of 25 units, a consumer surplus of $312.5 and a profit of $0 for LWE. To avoid losses, the lowest price they can charge is $21, leading to an output of 29 units, a consumer surplus of $420.5, a profit of $0 and a deadweight loss of $8. With Kristina's plan, a fixed amount of $52.5 per household can ensure there's no deadweight loss.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the equilibrium price for no deadweight loss

A deadweight loss is avoided when the market is in equilibrium. This happens when the quantity demanded equals the quantity supplied. Thus, set \(Q = 50 - P\) equal to \(Q = TC - 500\), giving \(50 - P = 500 + P\). Solving for \(P\) gives the equilibrium price as \(P = 25\).
02

Find the equilibrium quantity

The equilibrium quantity is found by substituting the equilibrium price into the demand equation: \(Q = 50 - P\), yielding \(Q = 50 - 25 = 25\).
03

Calculate the consumer surplus and LWE's profit

The consumer surplus is the area under the demand curve and above the price line, represented by the formula: \(0.5 * (max price - equilibrium price) * quantity \), which gives: \(0.5 * (50 - 25) * 25 = 312.5\). LWE's profit is the total revenue minus total costs, given by \( (P * Q) - TC\), which gives: \( (25 * 25) - (500 + 25) = 0\).
04

Find the lowest price to avoid loss

The lowest price for LWE to avoid losses occurs when price is equal to the average total cost. Since the total cost function is linear (TC = 500 + Q) and the number of households are 10, we need to find the price where the total cost equals the total revenues. Setting these two equal we get, \( (P * Q) = 500 + Q \). Solving for \(P\), we get \(P = 500/Q + 1 = 21\).
05

Calculate quantities, consumer surplus, profit and deadweight loss

Substituting \(P = 21\) into the demand equation gives us \(Q = 50 - 21 = 29\). The consumer surplus is: \(0.5 * (50 - 21) * 29 = 420.5\), and LWE's profit is \( (21 * 29) - (500 + 29) = 0\). Since price is above the equilibrium price, there is a deadweight loss given by \(0.5 * (25 - 21) * (29 - 25) = 8\).
06

Determine the fixed amount under Kristina's plan

With Kristina's plan, households must pay a fixed amount and a per-unit charge for electricity. Since the per-unit charge is the equilibrium price to break even, which we calculated in Step 1 as $25, the fixed amount can be determined by calculating the difference between the total cost and total revenue at the equilibrium quantity of 25. So, the fixed amount per household will be \( (500 + 25)/10 = 52.5\). Since the households are paying less than their maximum willingness to pay for electricity (which is $50), we can be confident they will choose to pay rather than go without electricity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Consumer Surplus
Consumer surplus is a vital concept in understanding how consumers benefit from market transactions. It represents the difference between what consumers are willing to pay for a good or service and what they actually pay. It is the area under the demand curve and above the price line in a graph.
For example, in the electricity market of Lake Wobegon, Minnesota, the equilibrium price was set at \(25. The maximum price consumers were willing to pay was \)50. This results in a consumer surplus calculated as:
  • Consumer Surplus Formula: \( ext{Consumer Surplus} = 0.5 \times ( ext{Maximum Price} - ext{Equilibrium Price}) \times ext{Quantity} \)
  • Using the numbers provided, we find the surplus is \(0.5 \times (50 - 25) \times 25 = 312.5\)
This consumer surplus shows the total additional benefit the households receive from purchasing electricity at the equilibrium price.
Deadweight Loss
Deadweight loss occurs in a market when the allocation of resources is not efficient, leading to a loss of total welfare. In a perfectly competitive market in equilibrium, there is no deadweight loss because resources are optimally allocated between producers and consumers. Any deviation from this equilibrium, such as taxation or price floors/ceilings, may lead to this inefficiency.
In the provided exercise, if the electricity price is set higher than the equilibrium price, the producers might still cover their costs, but some consumer demand is unmet. This is evident when the price was set at \(21 to avoid company losses, leading to a deadweight loss because the equilibrium price was originally \)25. The exact loss is computed as:
  • Deadweight Loss Formula: \(0.5 \times ( ext{Equilibrium Price} - ext{New Price}) \times ( ext{New Quantity} - ext{Equilibrium Quantity}) = 8\)
Thus, this $8 loss represents the inefficiency from not operating at true equilibrium.
Price Equilibrium
Price equilibrium is the state in an economic market where the quantity demanded matches the quantity supplied at a particular price. It is the moving force which balances supply and demand, creating market stability. At this point, neither shortages nor surpluses occur.
In Lake Wobegon's electricity market, equilibrium is achieved when the quantity demanded by all households equals the amount supplied by Lake Wobegon Electric. The demand function was given as \(Q = 50 - P\), and to find equilibrium, this was set equal to the supply, described by the cost function adjusted for units \(P = 500 + Q - 500\). After computing, the equilibrium price was calculated to be $25, creating an equilibrium quantity of 25 units.
Profit Calculation
In business, profit calculation is fundamental to determining how much gain a company receives from its operations. It is computed as total revenue minus total costs. Managers and regulators often use this to decide pricing and strategize financial health.
For Lake Wobegon Electric, several computations were necessary to understand the profit outcomes at different prices:
  • At equilibrium price $25: Profit = Revenue - Total Cost = (25 * 25) - (500 + 25) = 0
  • With a price at $21 to cover costs but below equilibrium, the profit was still calculated as zero because total revenue matched the adjusted cost.
These calculations ensure that Lake Wobegon Electric can break even and maintain operations while providing fair value to customers.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose a profit-maximizing monopolist is producing 800 units of output and is charging a price of \(\$ 40\) per unit. a. If the elasticity of demand for the product is -2 find the marginal cost of the last unit produced. b. What is the firm's percentage markup of price over marginal cost? c. Suppose that the average cost of the last unit produced is \(\$ 15\) and the firm's fixed cost is \(\$ 2000\). Find the firm's profit.

The employment of teaching assistants (TAs) by major universities can be characterized as a monopsony. Suppose the demand for TAs is \(W=30,000-125 n\) where \(W\) is the wage (as an annual salary) and \(n\) is the number of TAs hired. The supply of TAs is given by \(W=1000+75 n\) a. If the university takes advantage of its monopsonist position, how many TAs will it hire? What wage will it pay? b. If, instead, the university faced an infinite supply of TAs at the annual wage level of \(\$ 10,000,\) how many TAs would it hire?

Caterpillar Tractor, one of the largest producers of farm machinery in the world, has hired you to advise it on pricing policy. One of the things the company would like to know is how much a 5-percent increase in price is likely to reduce sales. What would you need to know to help the company with this problem? Explain why these facts are important.

A monopolist faces the following demand curve: \\[ Q=144 / P^{2} \\] where \(Q\) is the quantity demanded and \(P\) is price. Its average variable cost is \\[ \mathrm{AVC}=Q^{1 / 2} \\] and its fixed cost is 5 a. What are its profit-maximizing price and quantity? What is the resulting profit? b. Suppose the government regulates the price to be no greater than \(\$ 4\) per unit. How much will the monopolist produce? What will its profit be? c. Suppose the government wants to set a ceiling price that induces the monopolist to produce the largest possible output. What price will accomplish this goal?

Will an increase in the demand for a monopolist's product always result in a higher price? Explain. Will an increase in the supply facing a monopsonist buyer always result in a lower price? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free