Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

About 100 million pounds of jelly beans are consumed in the United States each year, and the price has been about 50 cents per pound. However, jelly bean producers feel that their incomes are too low and have convinced the government that price supports are in order. The government will therefore buy up as many jelly beans as necessary to keep the price at \(\$ 1\) per pound. However, government economists are worried about the impact of this program because they have no estimates of the elasticities of jelly bean demand or supply. a. Could this program cost the government more than \(\$ 50\) million per year? Under what conditions? Could it cost less than \(\$ 50\) million per year? Under what conditions? Illustrate with a diagram. b. Could this program cost consumers (in terms of lost consumer surplus) more than \(\$ 50\) million per year? Under what conditions? Could it cost consumers less than \(\$ 50\) million per year? Under what conditions? Again, use a diagram to illustrate.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, this program could potentially cost the government and consumers more than $50 million per year depending on the elasticity of supply and demand. If supply is elastic, it will result in larger surplus which the government has to purchase, costing more than $50 million. Similarly, if demand is elastic, there will be a larger decrease in consumer surplus, costing consumers more than $50 million. On the contrary, it can cost less if supply and demand are inelastic.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Price Supports

Price supports are minimum prices set by a government for certain commodities to ensure that their incomes are not too low. In this case, the government decides to set the price at $1 per pound to increase the income of jelly bean producers.
02

Estimating Government Cost

The cost for the government to implement this program depends on the quantity of jelly beans that the government would need to buy in order to maintain the $1 per pound price. If the price elasticity of supply is higher, jelly bean producers will increase production, leading to more surplus that the government has to buy. This could potentially cost the government more than $50 million per year. Conversely, if the price elasticity of supply is lower, producers won't increase their production that much and the government won't need to buy as many beans, potentially costing less than $50 million per year.
03

Estimating Consumer Cost

The cost for consumers depends on the price elasticity of demand. If demand is more elastic, consumers respond to the price increase by significantly decreasing their consumption, resulting in a large loss in consumer surplus, potentially costing more than $50 million per year. But if demand is less elastic, consumers do not reduce their consumption significantly, resulting in a smaller loss in consumer surplus, potentially costing less than $50 million per year.
04

Diagram Illustration

Begin by drawing a diagram with 'Quantity of Jelly Beans' on the x-axis and 'Price per Pound' on the y-axis. Draw a downward sloping demand curve and an upward sloping supply curve, showing the initial equilibrium price at 50 cents per pound. After implementing the price support, draw horizontal line at the new price level of $1 per pound, creating a surplus of supply. The area representing the cost to the government will be the difference in quantities multiplied by the difference in prices. Similarly, the area of the consumer surplus before and after price support represents the cost to consumers. Vary these areas based on changes in elasticity for different scenarios.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose the market for widgets can be described by the following equations: \\[ \begin{array}{cl} \text {Demand:} & P=10-Q \\ \text {Supply:} & P=Q-4 \end{array} \\] where \(P\) is the price in dollars per unit and \(Q\) is the quantity in thousands of units. Then: a. What is the equilibrium price and quantity? b. Suppose the government imposes a tax of \(\$ 1\) per unit to reduce widget consumption and raise government revenues. What will the new equilibrium quantity be? What price will the buyer pay? What amount per unit will the seller receive? c. Suppose the government has a change of heart about the importance of widgets to the happiness of the American public. The tax is removed and a subsidy of \(\$ 1\) per unit granted to widget producers. What will the equilibrium quantity be? What price will the buyer pay? What amount per unit (including the subsidy) will the seller receive? What will be the total cost to the government?

From time to time, Congress has raised the minimum wage. Some people suggested that a government subsidy could help employers finance the higher wage. This exercise examines the economics of a minimum wage and wage subsidies. Suppose the supply of lowskilled labor is given by \\[ L^{s}=10 w \\] where \(L^{\mathrm{s}}\) is the quantity of low-skilled labor (in millions of persons employed each year), and \(w\) is the wage rate (in dollars per hour). The demand for labor is given by \\[ L^{D}=80-10 w \\] a. What will be the free-market wage rate and employment level? Suppose the government sets a minimum wage of \(\$ 5\) per hour. How many people would then be employed? b. Suppose that instead of a minimum wage, the government pays a subsidy of \(\$ 1\) per hour for each employee. What will the total level of employment be now? What will the equilibrium wage rate be?

You know that if a tax is imposed on a particular product, the burden of the tax is shared by producers and consumers. You also know that the demand for automobiles is characterized by a stock adjustment process. Suppose a special 20 -percent sales tax is suddenly imposed on automobiles. Will the share of the tax paid by consumers rise, fall, or stay the same over time? Explain briefly. Repeat for a 50 -centsper-gallon gasoline tax.

The United States currently imports all of its coffee. The annual demand for coffee by U.S. consumers is given by the demand curve \(Q=250-10 P,\) where \(Q\) is quantity (in millions of pounds) and \(P\) is the market price per pound of coffee. World producers can harvest and ship coffee to U.S. distributors at a constant marginal \((=\text { average })\) cost of \(\$ 8\) per pound. U.S. distributors can in turn distribute coffee for a constant \(\$ 2\) per pound. The U.S. coffee market is competitive. Congress is considering a tariff on coffee imports of \(\$ 2\) per pound. a. If there is no tariff, how much do consumers pay for a pound of coffee? What is the quantity demanded? b. If the tariff is imposed, how much will consumers pay for a pound of coffee? What is the quantity demanded? c. Calculate the lost consumer surplus. d. Calculate the tax revenue collected by the government. e. Does the tariff result in a net gain or a net loss to society as a whole?

In \(1983,\) the Reagan administration introduced a new agricultural program called the Payment-in-Kind Program. To see how the program worked, let's consider the wheat market: a. Suppose the demand function is \(Q^{D}=28-2 P\) and the supply function is \(Q^{s}=4+4 P\), where \(P\) is the price of wheat in dollars per bushel, and \(Q\) is the quantity in billions of bushels. Find the free-market equilibrium price and quantity. b. Now suppose the government wants to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. However, the payment is made in wheat rather than in dollars-hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from vast government reserves accumulated from previous price support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equal to the amount that could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is now produced by farmers? How much is indirectly supplied to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose? c. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, it would have stored or destroyed it. Do taxpayers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program create?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free