Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A computer programmer lobbies against copyrighting software, arguing that everyone should benefit from innovative programs written for personal computers and that exposure to a wide variety of computer programs will inspire young programmers to create even more innovative programs. Considering the marginal social benefits possibly gained by this proposal, do you agree with this position?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Agreement or disagreement with the programmer's position would depend on one's understanding of the potential marginal social benefits. The open sharing of software could potentially deliver benefits in terms of increased knowledge and innovation, but might also reduce incentives for original creators. Hence, a balanced response would acknowledge both sides of the argument.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Argument

Firstly, it is necessary to comprehend the argument made by the programmer. Essentially, the programmer believes that everyone should benefit from innovative software, implying that restrictions like copyrights could prevent this broad benefit. The programmer also argues that exposure to diverse computer programs would inspire more innovation.
02

Understanding Marginal Social Benefits

The concept of marginal social benefit refers to the total increase in societal benefit or welfare from consuming or producing one extra unit of a good. In this context, one has to consider the societal benefits that could be achieved if software were freely accessible for everyone and could be used as inspiration for new software innovations.
03

Evaluating the Proposal

Remember to evaluate both the positive and negative implications of this proposal. On the positive side, freer access to software could indeed inspire young programmers and create a more innovative software industry. It could also result in broader societal benefits in terms of increased knowledge and skills. However, drawbacks might include reduced incentives for original software creators if they can't monetize their creations effectively. This could potentially stifle innovation and creativity in the long run.
04

Formulating a Response

After consideration of all factors, a response can be formulated. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the position would depend on one's assessment of the potential marginal social benefits against potential disadvantages.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Medical research has shown the negative health effects of "secondhand" smoke. Recent social trends point to growing intolerance of smoking in public areas. If you are a smoker and you wish to continue smoking despite tougher anti- smoking laws, describe the effect of the following legislative proposals on your behavior. As a result of these programs, do you, the individual smoker, benefit? Does society benefit as a whole? a. A bill is proposed that would lower tar and nicotine levels in all cigarettes. b. A tax is levied on each pack of cigarettes. c. \(A\) tax is levied on each pack of cigarettes sold. d. Smokers would be required to carry governmentissued smoking permits at all times.

Four firms located at different points on a river dump various quantities of effluent into it. The effluent adversely affects the quality of swimming for homeowners who live downstream. These people can build swimming pools to avoid swimming in the river, and the firms can purchase filters that eliminate harmful chemicals dumped in the river. As a policy adviser for a regional planning organization, how would you compare and contrast the following options for dealing with the harmful effect of the effluent: a. An equal-rate effluent fee on firms located on the river. b. An equal standard per firm on the level of effluent that each can dump. c. A transferable effluent permit system in which the aggregate level of effluent is fixed and all firms receive identical permits.

A number of firms have located in the western portion of a town after single- family residences took up the eastern portion. Each firm produces the same product and in the process emits noxious fumes that adversely affect the residents of the community. a. Why is there an externality created by the firms? b. Do you think that private bargaining can resolve the problem? Explain. c. How might the community determine the efficient level of air quality?

Assume that scientific studies provide you with the following information concerning the benefits and costs of sulfur dioxide emissions: Benefits of abating (reduc- \\[ \mathrm{MB}=500-20 A \\] ing ) emissions: costs of abating emissions: \\[ \mathrm{MC}=200+5 A \\] where \(A\) is the quantity abated in millions of tons and the benefits and costs are given in dollars per ton. a. What is the socially efficient level of emissions abatement? b. What are the marginal benefit and marginal cost of abatement at the socially efficient level of abatement? c. What happens to net social benefits (benefits minus costs) if you abate one million more tons than the efficient level? One million fewer? d. Why is it socially efficient to set marginal benefits equal to marginal costs rather than abating until total benefits equal total costs?

Reconsider the common resource problem given in Example \(18.7 .\) Suppose that crawfish popularity continues to increase, and that the demand curve shifts from \(C=0.401-0.0064 F\) to \(C=0.50-0.0064 F\) How does this shift in demand affect the actual crawfish catch, the efficient catch, and the social cost of common access? (Hint: Use the marginal social cost and private cost curves given in the example.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free