Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Reconsider the common resource problem given in Example \(18.7 .\) Suppose that crawfish popularity continues to increase, and that the demand curve shifts from \(C=0.401-0.0064 F\) to \(C=0.50-0.0064 F\) How does this shift in demand affect the actual crawfish catch, the efficient catch, and the social cost of common access? (Hint: Use the marginal social cost and private cost curves given in the example.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
This shift in demand leads to an increase in both the actual and efficient crawfish catch, due to higher willingness to pay. However, it also generates a larger social cost due to overconsumption.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the initial demand price function and quantity function

The initial demand function for crawfish was \(C=0.401-0.0064F\), where C is the price of crawfish and F is the number of crawfish caught.
02

Understanding the new demand function

Due to an increase in popularity, the demand curve shifts upwards to \(C=0.50-0.0064F\). This suggests that the price people are willing to pay for crawfish has increased, while the quantity demanded decreases with F.
03

Calculating changes in crawfish catch

To find the actual catch, this will be where the new demand equals to the private cost. Equate both equations given in the example and solve for F.
04

Efficient Catch Calculation

The efficient catch is where demand equals to the social cost. Equate the given social cost equation to the new demand equation and solve for F.
05

Impact on the social cost

The social cost can be found by comparing the actual catch and the efficient catch. The increased demand curve means people are willing to pay more for the same quantity, implying an increased consumption which leads to an increase in social cost.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Demand Curve Shift
A demand curve shift occurs when there is a change in how much of a product consumers want at every price level. In this scenario, the demand curve for crawfish shifted upward due to increased popularity. Originally, the demand was represented by the function \(C=0.401-0.0064F\). This equation shows the relationship between price \(C\) and quantity \(F\) of crawfish. The new demand function \(C=0.50-0.0064F\) indicates a higher price consumers are willing to pay.
This shift means that even if the quantity remains the same, the price consumers are prepared to pay has increased, reflecting greater demand. Key implications include:
  • An increased price at each quantity level
  • A higher intersection point with other economic curves
This change affects both the actual and efficient level of crawfish catch as well.
Marginal Social Cost
Marginal social cost (MSC) is the total cost to society of producing an additional unit of a good. This includes both private costs and any external costs. When the demand curve for crawfish shifts, it affects the MSC because the increased catch due to higher consumer willingness to pay leads to more resources being used.
The MSC can be represented by a curve that shows the relationship between the cost of catching additional crawfish and the quantity caught. As demand increases, this curve may shift or steepen, indicating that the cost to society of catching each additional crawfish has increased. This concept helps determine the efficient catch point by balancing societal costs with demand.
Private Cost
Private cost refers to the expense incurred directly by the producers of a good or service. In our case, it pertains to those catching the crawfish. Unlike marginal social cost, private costs do not include externalities. When the demand curve shifts, it impacts the equilibrium point where the demand and private cost curves intersect.
The intersection determines the actual number of crawfish caught, which is driven by the market's supply and demand balance. Understanding this helps in analyzing how changes in consumer interest affect the producers directly and influence market decisions.
Knowing private costs is essential for businesses to set prices effectively and for policymakers to understand how private interests align with or differ from public interests.
Efficient Catch
Efficient catch is achieved when the quantity of a common resource, like crawfish, caught matches the quantity where marginal social benefits equal marginal social costs. This is optimal as it reflects a balance where resources are allocated without excessive overuse or waste.
When the demand curve shifts, the efficient catch point changes as well. In this instance, it requires balancing the new, higher consumer demand with the cost of potential overuse, which could deplete the crawfish stock.
  • Ensures sustainability
  • Aligns usage with societal well-being
Calculating the efficient catch involves equating the new demand to marginal social costs, which requires understanding both these factors' equations.
This involves analysis to find where the new demand curve intersects with the marginal social cost curve, which results in efficient use of the resource.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume that scientific studies provide you with the following information concerning the benefits and costs of sulfur dioxide emissions: Benefits of abating (reduc- \\[ \mathrm{MB}=500-20 A \\] ing ) emissions: costs of abating emissions: \\[ \mathrm{MC}=200+5 A \\] where \(A\) is the quantity abated in millions of tons and the benefits and costs are given in dollars per ton. a. What is the socially efficient level of emissions abatement? b. What are the marginal benefit and marginal cost of abatement at the socially efficient level of abatement? c. What happens to net social benefits (benefits minus costs) if you abate one million more tons than the efficient level? One million fewer? d. Why is it socially efficient to set marginal benefits equal to marginal costs rather than abating until total benefits equal total costs?

Medical research has shown the negative health effects of "secondhand" smoke. Recent social trends point to growing intolerance of smoking in public areas. If you are a smoker and you wish to continue smoking despite tougher anti- smoking laws, describe the effect of the following legislative proposals on your behavior. As a result of these programs, do you, the individual smoker, benefit? Does society benefit as a whole? a. A bill is proposed that would lower tar and nicotine levels in all cigarettes. b. A tax is levied on each pack of cigarettes. c. \(A\) tax is levied on each pack of cigarettes sold. d. Smokers would be required to carry governmentissued smoking permits at all times.

In a market for dry cleaning, the inverse market demand function is given by \(P=100-Q\), and the (private) marginal cost of production for the aggregation of all dry-cleaning firms is given by \(\mathrm{MC}=10+Q\) Finally, the pollution generated by the dry cleaning process creates external damages given by the marginal external cost curve \(\mathrm{MEC}=Q\) a. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under competitive conditions without regulation. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of dry cleaning. c. Determine the tax that would result in a competitive market producing the socially efficient output. d. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under monopolistic conditions without regulation. e. Determine the tax that would result in a monopolistic market producing the socially efficient output. f. Assuming that no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the pollution, which market structure vields higher social welfare? Discuss.

A computer programmer lobbies against copyrighting software, arguing that everyone should benefit from innovative programs written for personal computers and that exposure to a wide variety of computer programs will inspire young programmers to create even more innovative programs. Considering the marginal social benefits possibly gained by this proposal, do you agree with this position?

There are three groups in a community. Their demand curves for public television in hours of programming, \(T,\) are given respectively by \\[ \begin{array}{l} W_{1}=\$ 200-T \\ W_{2}=\$ 240-2 T \\ W_{3}=\$ 320-2 T \end{array} \\] Suppose public television is a pure public good that can be produced at a constant marginal cost of \(\$ 200\) per hour a. What is the efficient number of hours of public television? b. How much public television would a competitive private market provide?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free