Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

There are three groups in a community. Their demand curves for public television in hours of programming, \(T,\) are given respectively by \\[ \begin{array}{l} W_{1}=\$ 200-T \\ W_{2}=\$ 240-2 T \\ W_{3}=\$ 320-2 T \end{array} \\] Suppose public television is a pure public good that can be produced at a constant marginal cost of \(\$ 200\) per hour a. What is the efficient number of hours of public television? b. How much public television would a competitive private market provide?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The efficient number of hours of public television is 112 hours, while a competitive private market would provide 280 hours.

Step by step solution

01

Summing the demand curves

In case of public goods, the social benefit is equal to the sum of the individual benefits. Thus, it is necessary to first sum the three demand curves in order to find the community's overall demand function for public television. This function is given by \( W=\$ 760-5T \).
02

Find the efficient number of hours

Next, for finding the efficient number of hours of public television, equate marginal cost (MC) with the marginal benefit (MB). The demand function derived in step 1 gives the relation for marginal benefit. In this case, equate the marginal cost of \(\$200\) per hour to aggregated demand: \(\$200=\$760-5T\). Thus, solving for \(T\), the efficient number of public television hours is \(112\) hours.
03

Determine television hours provided by private market

On the other hand, a competitive private market would equate the marginal cost with each demand curve separately as they perceive benefits individually. Doing so yields \( T=280, 120, 60\) hours respectively for \( W_1, W_2, W_3 \). The quantity of TV programming supplied by the private market would be the quantity corresponding to the highest willingness to pay, i.e., the highest \( T \) value, which is \( 280 \) hours.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Demand Curves
Understanding demand curves is essential for analyzing how consumers respond to changes in price and quantity. In the context of public goods like public television, each group within a community has a different valuation for the service, represented by their individual demand curves. For instance, given by the equations \( W_1 = \$200 - T \), \( W_2 = \$240 - 2T \), and \( W_3 = \$320 - 2T \), where \( W \) represents willingness to pay and \( T \) stands for hours of programming.

These demand curves slope downward, reflecting the economic principle that willingness to pay decreases as the quantity consumed increases. For public goods, each person's benefit does not diminish others' ability to enjoy it, which is why the total demand in such a scenario is the vertical sum of individual demand curves. This concept is crucial in determining the community's overall demand, and ultimately, the efficient level of provision for the public good.
Marginal Cost
Marginal cost is the cost of producing one additional unit of a good or service. In microeconomics, it's a fundamental concept as it helps determine the most efficient point of production. When it comes to public goods, the notion remains the same, although the social nature of these goods presents unique challenges. For public television, the exercise assumes a constant marginal cost of \( \$200 \) per hour, signifying that producing each additional hour of programming incurs the same expense.

Efficient provision occurs where the marginal cost of providing the service equals the collective marginal benefit, the point at which the additional cost to provide the service is just equal to the additional benefit as valued by the consumers. This balance is crucial in ensuring resources are not wasted and maximum social welfare is achieved.
Efficiency in Public Goods Provision
Efficiency in providing public goods like television programming is achieved when the sum of the community's marginal benefit equals the marginal cost of production. To obtain this social efficiency, the total willingness to pay (or aggregated demand) by all groups is considered rather than the individual demand curves.

Illustrating Efficiency

For the given problem, the summed demand curves reveal the community's overall valuation of public television, which, when set equal to the marginal cost, helps us find the efficient number of hours. The efficiency calculation resulted in \( 112 \) hours of programming, indicating the level where the last hour provided costs just as much as the value it delivers to the community as a whole.
Private Market Provision
When dealing with public goods, private market provision can lead to inefficiency due to the nature of these goods being non-rivalrous and non-excludable. In a private market, providers are motivated by profits and thus equate their marginal cost with the willingness to pay of individual groups, not the community as a whole.

As illustrated, each group's demand results in a different level of desired television programming. The private market tends to cater to those with the highest willingness to pay; however, this does not lead to the socially efficient outcome as it overlooks the combined benefit to all groups. In our exercise, the private market would supply \( 280 \) hours, far exceeding the efficient quantity, and leading to potential overproduction and misallocation of resources.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume that scientific studies provide you with the following information concerning the benefits and costs of sulfur dioxide emissions: Benefits of abating (reduc- \\[ \mathrm{MB}=500-20 A \\] ing ) emissions: costs of abating emissions: \\[ \mathrm{MC}=200+5 A \\] where \(A\) is the quantity abated in millions of tons and the benefits and costs are given in dollars per ton. a. What is the socially efficient level of emissions abatement? b. What are the marginal benefit and marginal cost of abatement at the socially efficient level of abatement? c. What happens to net social benefits (benefits minus costs) if you abate one million more tons than the efficient level? One million fewer? d. Why is it socially efficient to set marginal benefits equal to marginal costs rather than abating until total benefits equal total costs?

Reconsider the common resource problem given in Example \(18.7 .\) Suppose that crawfish popularity continues to increase, and that the demand curve shifts from \(C=0.401-0.0064 F\) to \(C=0.50-0.0064 F\) How does this shift in demand affect the actual crawfish catch, the efficient catch, and the social cost of common access? (Hint: Use the marginal social cost and private cost curves given in the example.)

A number of firms have located in the western portion of a town after single- family residences took up the eastern portion. Each firm produces the same product and in the process emits noxious fumes that adversely affect the residents of the community. a. Why is there an externality created by the firms? b. Do you think that private bargaining can resolve the problem? Explain. c. How might the community determine the efficient level of air quality?

A computer programmer lobbies against copyrighting software, arguing that everyone should benefit from innovative programs written for personal computers and that exposure to a wide variety of computer programs will inspire young programmers to create even more innovative programs. Considering the marginal social benefits possibly gained by this proposal, do you agree with this position?

In a market for dry cleaning, the inverse market demand function is given by \(P=100-Q\), and the (private) marginal cost of production for the aggregation of all dry-cleaning firms is given by \(\mathrm{MC}=10+Q\) Finally, the pollution generated by the dry cleaning process creates external damages given by the marginal external cost curve \(\mathrm{MEC}=Q\) a. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under competitive conditions without regulation. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of dry cleaning. c. Determine the tax that would result in a competitive market producing the socially efficient output. d. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under monopolistic conditions without regulation. e. Determine the tax that would result in a monopolistic market producing the socially efficient output. f. Assuming that no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the pollution, which market structure vields higher social welfare? Discuss.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free