Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Many industries are often plagued by overcapacity: Firms simultaneously invest in capacity expansion, so that total capacity far exceeds demand. This happens not only in industries in which demand is highly volatile and unpredictable, but also in industries in which demand is fairly stable. What factors lead to overcapacity? Explain each briefly.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Overcapacity in industries, be it with volatile or stable demand, can occur due to factors such as fluctuation in demand, technological change, competition, inaccurate forecasting and regulatory changes.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Overcapacity

Overcapacity is a situation where the supply of goods exceeds demand. In industries, this situation can occur due to various reasons, regardless of whether the industry has a volatile or stable demand situation.
02

Factors Leading To Overcapacity In Volatile Demand Industries

For industries with volatile and unpredictable demand, the factors leading to overcapacity could be: \n1. Fluctuating demand: Since demand is unpredictable, firms may overshoot their capacity to prepare for peak demand periods, resulting in overcapacity in lower demand periods. \n2. Technological change: Rapid advancements in technology may render present capacity obsolete, leading to overcapacity.
03

Factors Leading To Overcapacity In Stable Demand Industries

Even in industries with stable demand, overcapacity can occur due to reasons such as: \n1. Competition: To gain a larger market share, a firm may expand its capacity, causing others to do the same leading to overall overcapacity. \n2. Inaccurate forecasting: Firms could overestimate future demand, leading to unnecessary expansion of capacity. \n3. Regulatory changes: Sometimes changes in regulations or policies can lead to overcapacity. For example, if a policy reduces the cost of increasing capacity, firms may over-invest.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Defendo has decided to introduce a revolutionary video game. As the first firm in the market, it will have a monopoly position for at least some time. In deciding what type of manufacturing plant to build, it has the choice of two technologies. Technology \(A\) is publicly available and will result in annual costs of \\[ C^{A}(q)=10+8 q \\] Technology \(B\) is a proprietary technology developed in Defendo's research labs. It involves a higher fixed cost of production but lower marginal costs: \\[ C^{B}(q)=60+2 q \\] Defendo must decide which technology to adopt. Market demand for the new product is \(P=20-Q\) where \(Q\) is total industry output. a. Suppose Defendo were certain that it would maintain its monopoly position in the market for the entire product lifespan (about five years) without threat of entry. Which technology would you advise Defendo to adopt? What would be Defendo's profit given this choice? b. Suppose Defendo expects its archrival, Offendo, to consider entering the market shortly after Defendo introduces its new product. Offendo will have access only to Technology \(A\). If Offendo does enter the market, the two firms will play a Cournot game (in quantities) and arrive at the Cournot-Nash equilibrium. i. If Defendo adopts Technology \(A\) and Offendo enters the market, what will be the profit of each firm? Would Offendo choose to enter the market given these profits? ii. If Defendo adopts Technology \(B\) and Offendo enters the market, what will be the profit of each firm? Would Offendo choose to enter the market given these profits? iii. Which technology would you advise Defendo to adopt given the threat of possible entry? What will be Defendo's profit given this choice? What will be consumer surplus given this choice? c. What happens to social welfare (the sum of consumer surplus and producer profit) as a result of the threat of entry in this market? What happens to equilibrium price? What might this imply about the role of potential competition in limiting market power?

In many oligopolistic industries, the same firms compete over a long period of time, setting prices and observing each other's behavior repeatedly. Given the large number of repetitions, why don't collusive outcomes typically result?

Three contestants, \(A, B,\) and \(C,\) each has a balloon and a pistol. From fixed positions, they fire at each other's balloons. When a balloon is hit, its owner is out. When only one balloon remains, its owner gets a \(\$ 1000\) prize. At the outset, the players decide by lot the order in which they will fire, and each player can choose any remaining balloon as his target. Everyone knows that \(A\) is the best shot and always hits the target, that \(B\) hits the target with probability \(.9,\) and that \(C\) hits the target with probability \(.8 .\) Which contestant has the highest probability of winning the \(\$ 1000 ?\) Explain why.

You play the following bargaining game. Player \(A\) moves first and makes Player \(B\) an offer for the division of \(\$ 100 .\) (For example, Player \(A\) could suggest that she take \(\$ 60\) and Player \(B\) take \(\$ 40 .\) ) Player \(B\) can accept or reject the offer. If he rejects it, the amount of money available drops to \(\$ 90,\) and he then makes an offer for the division of this amount. If Player \(A\) rejects this offer, the amount of money drops to \(\$ 80\) and Player \(A\) makes an offer for its division. If Player \(B\) rejects this offer, the amount of money drops to 0 Both players are rational, fully informed, and want to maximize their payoffs. Which player will do best in this game?

You are in the market for a new house and have decided to bid for a house at auction. You believe that the value of the house is between \(\$ 125,000\) and \(\$ 150,000,\) but you are uncertain as to where in the range it might be. You do know, however, that the seller has reserved the right to withdraw the house from the market if the winning bid is not satisfactory. a. Should you bid in this auction? Why or why not? b. Suppose you are a building contractor. You plan to improve the house and then to resell it at a profit. How does this situation affect your answer to (a)? Does it depend on the extent to which your skills are uniquely suitable to improving this particular house?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free