Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Demand for light bulbs can be characterized by \(Q=100-P,\) where \(Q\) is in millions of boxes of lights sold and \(P\) is the price per box. There are two producers of lights, Everglow and Dimlit. They have identical cost functions: $$\begin{array}{c} C_{i}=10 Q_{i}+\frac{1}{2} Q_{i}^{2}(i=E, D) \\ Q=Q_{E}+Q_{D} \end{array}$$ a. Unable to recognize the potential for collusion, the two firms act as short-run perfect competitors. What are the equilibrium values of \(Q_{E^{\prime}} Q_{D^{\prime}}\) and \(P ?\) What are each firm's profits? b. Top management in both firms is replaced. Each new manager independently recognizes the oligopolistic nature of the light bulb industry and plays Cournot. What are the equilibrium values of \(Q_{E^{\prime}} Q_{D^{\prime}}\) and \(P ?\) What are each firm's profits? c. Suppose the Everglow manager guesses correctly that Dimlit is playing Cournot, so Everglow plays Stackelberg. What are the equilibrium values of \(Q_{E^{\prime}}\) \(Q_{D^{\prime}}\) and \(P ?\) What are each firm's profits? d. If the managers of the two companies collude, what are the equilibrium values of \(Q_{E^{\prime}} Q_{D^{\prime}}\) and \(P ?\) What are each firm's profits?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Q_E=Q_D=45, P=55, Profit=992.5, b. Q_E=Q_D=30, P=40, Profit=800, c. Q_E=36, Q_D=27, P=37, Profit_Everglow=704, Profit_Dimlit=569, d. Q_E=Q_D=30, P=40, Profit=800

Step by step solution

01

Perfect Competition

Since Everglow and Dimlit are behaving as short-run perfect competitors, they set marginal cost equal to marginal revenue to maximize profits: MC=MR. The marginal cost using the cost function for each firm, \(MC=10+Q_i\). The marginal revenue is given by the derivative of Price times quantity, \(MR=P+Q\cdot(-1)=100-Q\). Setting these equal gives \(Q = 45\) for each Q_E, Q_D. The equilibrium price is \(P = 55\) (As P=100-Q and Q = Q_E+Q_D). Each firm's profit will be \(\pi= PQ_i - C_i = 45*55 - (10*45 + 0.5*45^2)= 992.5 \)
02

Oligopoly - Cournot Competition

In Cournot competition, each firm decides its own output, considering the output of the competitor as given. Based on the reaction function of firm i to the other firm j \( Q_i = (100 - Q_j -10)/2)\), the equilibrium quantity for both firms can be found: equating \( Q_D = (100 - Q_E -10)/2\) and \( Q_E = (100 - Q_D -10)/2\) with each other. Solving the system of equations results in \( Q_E = Q_D = 30 \) and \(P = 40\). Each firm's profit will be \(\pi= PQ - C = 40*30 - (10*30 + 0.5*30^2)= 800 \)
03

Stackelberg Competition

In a Stackelberg competition, one firm (the leader, Everglow here) moves first and the other firm (the follower, Dimlit here) reacts. Everglow will anticipate Dimlit's reaction when choosing its quantity. Applying the reaction function of Dimlit in Everglow's profit function ends up with best response function of Everglow: \(Q_E= (100 - 10) / 2.5 = 36\). Dimlit then reacts to Everglow's quantity: \(Q_D = (100 - 36 -10) / 2 = 27\). The price will be \(P = 37\) and the profits will be \(\pi_E = 704\) and \(\pi_D = 569\)
04

Collusion

In case of collusion, companies maximize their combined profit. The combined quantity will be \(Q = (100 - 10)/1.5 = 60\) and hence each firm produces \(Q_E=Q_D = Q / 2 = 30\). The price will be \(P = 40\) and the profits will be \(\pi= 800 \) for each

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Perfect Competition
Perfect competition is a market structure characterized by a large number of small firms, identical products, and easy entry and exit. In this case, firms are price takers, meaning that they cannot influence the market price. Each company maximizes its profit by setting its output where marginal cost (MC) equals marginal revenue (MR).

In the scenario provided, Everglow and Dimlit operate under such conditions. They determine their production quantities to balance the MC and MR, using their cost structure to calculate these values. The MC for each is derived from their cost function, which, in this example, is given by the formula:
  • \( MC = 10 + Q_i \)
The MR, derived from the demand function, is:
  • \( MR = 100 - Q \)
By equating MC and MR, the equilibrium point for each firm is found. This results in equal output levels, \( Q_E = Q_D = 45 \), and an equilibrium price of \( P = 55 \). Allowing these parameters gives equal profits for each firm as calculated.
Cournot Competition
Cournot competition depicts a scenario where firms compete on the quantity of output produced, believing their rival's quantity is fixed. This strategy occurs in an oligopoly situation, where each firm decides its strategy based on the actions of the others. Here, the firms aim to maximize profits by rationally anticipating the competitor's output.

Everglow and Dimlit, recognizing the oligopolistic setting, act according to Cournot principles. They use reaction functions to predict their competitor's behavior:
  • \( Q_i = \frac{100 - Q_j - 10}{2} \)
By realizing these in tandem, the equilibrium quantities are resolved as \( Q_E = Q_D = 30 \) with a price of \( P = 40 \). Thus, each firm benefits from the conjectural variations, ending with the same profit calculated using this refined equilibrium strategy.
Stackelberg Competition
The Stackelberg model allows for a leader-follower dynamic within an oligopoly. One firm, the leader, sets its quantity before others in the market, whereas the follower firms respond accordingly. This sequential move allows the leader to achieve a strategic advantage.

In this instance, Everglow takes the position of the leader by predicting Dimlit's response and setting its output strategically. Everglow uses Dimlit's reaction function within its calculations to optimize its own profit:
  • Everglow's best response: \( Q_E = \frac{100 - 10}{2.5} = 36 \)
  • Dimlit's reaction: \( Q_D = \frac{100 - 36 - 10}{2} = 27 \)
The resulting market price is \( P = 37 \), and through this planned leadership position, Everglow can enhance its profits compared to equal competition strategies.
Collusion
Collusion occurs when firms in an oligopoly cooperate, rather than competing against each other, to maximize their joint profits. This usually leads to outcomes similar to monopoly behavior, where the total industry output is reduced to increase prices and therefore profits.

In the provided example, if Everglow and Dimlit collude, they will jointly determine the quantity to maximize combined profits. This can result in each firm producing the same amount, effectively reducing competition:
  • \( Q = \frac{100 - 10}{1.5} = 60 \)
  • Each firm produces: \( Q_E = Q_D = \frac{Q}{2} = 30 \)
The price remains at \( P = 40 \), and each firm's profit remains high due to the decreased competition and aligned strategy focused on mutual profitability rather than market share dominance.
Equilibrium
Equilibrium in economics represents a state where market supply and demand balance each other, and as a result, prices become stable. In competitive market structures, Nash Equilibrium plays a crucial role, representing a situation where no participant can gain by unilaterally changing their strategy.

In this exercise, equilibrium values were calculated under several market interactions. For perfect competition, firms reach equilibrium by matching MC with MR. In Cournot competition, firms anticipate competitors' strategies to reach their equilibrium outputs. Meanwhile, under Stackelberg competition, one firm assumes leadership, setting the pace for equilibrium. Through collusion, both firms reach equilibrium by mutual agreement. In all scenarios, achieving equilibrium is key for optimizing each firm’s outcomes regardless of the competitive model employed.
Profit Maximization
Profit maximization is the chief objective for firms, achieved by setting production levels where marginal revenue equals marginal cost. This ensures that every single unit produced adds positively to the overall profit, with no over-production or costs outweighing returns.

Everglow and Dimlit’s differing strategies directly reflect their profit maximization goals across diverse competitive scenarios. Whether in perfect or Cournot competition or adopting Stackelberg leadership or colluding, each strategy hinges on adjusting output to perfect this economic fundamental. Using the provided cost functions and market parameters, they navigate through to define these conditions and ascertain the most advantageous production quantities that align with their profit targets.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose the airline industry consisted of only two firms: American and Texas Air Corp. Let the two firms have identical cost functions, \(C(q)=40 q\). Assume that the demand curve for the industry is given by \(P=100-Q\) and that each firm expects the other to behave as a Cournot competitor. a. Calculate the Cournot-Nash equilibrium for each firm, assuming that each chooses the output level that maximizes its profits when taking its rival's output as given. What are the profits of each firm? b. What would be the equilibrium quantity if Texas Air had constant marginal and average costs of \(\$ 25\) and American had constant marginal and average costs of \(\$ 40 ?\) c. Assuming that both firms have the original cost function, \(C(q)=40 q,\) how much should Texas Air be willing to invest to lower its marginal cost from 40 to \(25,\) assuming that American will not follow suit? How much should American be willing to spend to reduce its marginal cost to \(25,\) assuming that Texas Air will have marginal costs of 25 regardless of American's actions?

A lemon-growing cartel consists of four orchards. Their total cost functions are $$\begin{array}{l} \mathrm{TC}_{1}=20+5 Q_{1}^{2} \\ \mathrm{TC}_{2}=25+3 Q_{2}^{2} \\ \mathrm{TC}_{3}=15+4 Q_{3}^{2} \\ \mathrm{TC}_{4}=20+6 Q_{4}^{2} \end{array}$$ TC is in hundreds of dollars, and \(Q\) is in cartons per month picked and shipped. a. Tabulate total, average, and marginal costs for each firm for output levels between 1 and 5 cartons per month (i.e., for \(1,2,3,4,\) and 5 cartons) b. If the cartel decided to ship 10 cartons per month and set a price of \(\$ 25\) per carton, how should output be allocated among the firms? c. At this shipping level, which firm has the most incentive to cheat? Does any firm not have an incentive to cheat?

Two firms produce luxury sheepskin auto seat covers: Western Where (WW) and B.B.B. Sheep (BBBS). Each firm has a cost function given by $$C(q)=30 q+1.5 q^{2}$$ The market demand for these seat covers is represented by the inverse demand equation $$P=300-3 Q$$ where \(Q=q_{1}+q_{2},\) total output. a. If each firm acts to maximize its profits, taking its rival's output as given (i.e., the firms behave as Cournot oligopolists), what will be the equilibrium quantities selected by each firm? What is total output, and what is the market price? What are the profits for each firm? b. It occurs to the managers of \(\mathrm{WW}\) and \(\mathrm{BBBS}\) that they could do a lot better by colluding. If the two firms collude, what will be the profit-maximizing choice of output? The industry price? The output and the profit for each firm in this case? c. The managers of these firms realize that explicit agreements to collude are illegal. Each firm must decide on its own whether to produce the Cournot quantity or the cartel quantity. To aid in making the decision, the manager of WW constructs a payoff matrix like the one below. Fill in each box with the profit of \(\mathrm{WW}\) and the profit of BBBS. Given this payoff matrix, what output strategy is each firm likely to pursue? d. Suppose WW can set its output level before BBBS does. How much will WW choose to produce in this case? How much will BBBS produce? What is the market price, and what is the profit for each firm? Is WW better off by choosing its output first? Explain why or why not.

Two firms compete in selling identical widgets. They choose their output levels \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) simultaneously and face the demand curve $$P=30-Q$$ where \(Q=Q_{1}+Q_{2}\). Until recently, both firms had zero marginal costs. Recent environmental regulations have increased Firm \(2^{\prime}\) s marginal cost to \(\$ 15 .\) Firm \(1^{\prime}\) s marginal cost remains constant at zero. True or false: As a result, the market price will rise to the monopoly level Suppose that two identical firms produce widgets and

Suppose all firms in a monopolistically competitive industry were merged into one large firm. Would that new firm produce as many different brands? Would it produce only a single brand? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free