Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Two firms compete in selling identical widgets. They choose their output levels \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) simultaneously and face the demand curve $$P=30-Q$$ where \(Q=Q_{1}+Q_{2}\). Until recently, both firms had zero marginal costs. Recent environmental regulations have increased Firm \(2^{\prime}\) s marginal cost to \(\$ 15 .\) Firm \(1^{\prime}\) s marginal cost remains constant at zero. True or false: As a result, the market price will rise to the monopoly level Suppose that two identical firms produce widgets and

Short Answer

Expert verified
Given the available information, it is unclear if the market price will rise to the monopoly level. Though increase in marginal cost of one firm might lead to an increment in market price, whether this will reach the monopoly level is uncertain without knowing the actual monopoly price.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the concepts

Firms choose their output levels \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) simultaneously and face the given demand curve \(P=30-Q\), where \(Q=Q_{1}+Q_{2}\). Marginal cost is the cost added by producing one additional unit of a product or service. Here, Firm \(2^{\prime}\) s marginal cost has increased to \$15 due to environmental regulations while Firm \(1^{\prime}\) s marginal cost remains zero. The problem requires to state if the market price will rise to the monopoly level - a market structure characterized by a single seller, selling a unique product in the market with no close substitutes.
02

Analyze the demand function

The given demand function \(P=30-Q\) suggests that as the quantity \(Q\) increases, the price \(P\) will decrease. This is characteristic of demand in many markets where the price of an item falls as the quantity available increases.
03

Analyze the effect of marginal cost on output and price

Marginal cost plays a major role in economic decision-making processes of firms. In this case, an increase in the marginal cost of Firm 2 may cause it to reduce its output, \(Q_{2}\). This reduction in output may cause a rise in the market price, as the overall supply \(Q=Q_{1}+Q_{2}\) decreases.
04

Final step: Compare the resulting market price to monopoly price

A monopoly price is a price set by a monopolist due to lack of competition. However, the problem did not disclose the level of monopoly price. It is important to note that while the price in this market scenario might increase with the rise of marginal cost for Firm 2, whether it will reach the monopoly level or not, cannot be ascertained without the data for monopoly price level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Marginal Cost
Marginal cost is a critical concept in economics that relates to the cost of producing one extra unit of a product. It's often abbreviated as MC.
For firms in competitive markets, understanding marginal cost helps determine the level of output that maximizes profit.
In our exercise, Firm 2's marginal cost has risen to $15 while Firm 1 retains a marginal cost of zero.
Here’s how it affects decision-making:
  • Firm 2, faced with a higher marginal cost, may produce fewer units since each additional unit costs more to produce.
  • Firm 1, with a marginal cost of zero, can produce more as it incurs no extra cost for additional units.
Marginal cost influences pricing and production strategies, influencing overall market dynamics by changing the supply equilibrium.
Market Price
Market price is the prevailing price at which goods are sold in the market. It is determined by the intersection of supply and demand.
In an oligopoly, where few firms dominate the market, like in our example, strategic interactions between the firms significantly influence the market price.
If Firm 2 reduces its output due to a higher marginal cost, the supply decreases, potentially raising the market price if Firm 1 does not compensate by increasing its output.
  • The balance between firms' production levels will directly alter the market price.
  • With a reduced total output by Firm 2, market scarcity can induce higher prices, but the price may not reach monopoly levels without further data.
The interaction of supply and demand, adjusted by firms' production decisions, continues to play a pivotal role in setting the market price.
Demand Curve
A demand curve represents the relationship between the price of a good and the quantity demanded by consumers. In this context, the demand curve is given by the equation \(P=30-Q\), where \(Q\) is the total output of both firms.
This indicates that as supply increases, the price tends to fall, following the general law of demand.
The impact of changes in output levels from Firm 1 and Firm 2:
  • If total output \(Q\) decreases due to higher marginal costs driving Firm 2 to reduce its production, the demand curve suggests the price \(P\) will rise.
  • The slope also tells us how sensitive price is to changes in output quantity.
Scripts of supply and demand in oligopolistic markets thus dictate such fluctuating prices. Understanding how the demand curve operates aides firms in making smart production choices to optimize profits.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two firms produce luxury sheepskin auto seat covers: Western Where (WW) and B.B.B. Sheep (BBBS). Each firm has a cost function given by $$C(q)=30 q+1.5 q^{2}$$ The market demand for these seat covers is represented by the inverse demand equation $$P=300-3 Q$$ where \(Q=q_{1}+q_{2},\) total output. a. If each firm acts to maximize its profits, taking its rival's output as given (i.e., the firms behave as Cournot oligopolists), what will be the equilibrium quantities selected by each firm? What is total output, and what is the market price? What are the profits for each firm? b. It occurs to the managers of \(\mathrm{WW}\) and \(\mathrm{BBBS}\) that they could do a lot better by colluding. If the two firms collude, what will be the profit-maximizing choice of output? The industry price? The output and the profit for each firm in this case? c. The managers of these firms realize that explicit agreements to collude are illegal. Each firm must decide on its own whether to produce the Cournot quantity or the cartel quantity. To aid in making the decision, the manager of WW constructs a payoff matrix like the one below. Fill in each box with the profit of \(\mathrm{WW}\) and the profit of BBBS. Given this payoff matrix, what output strategy is each firm likely to pursue? d. Suppose WW can set its output level before BBBS does. How much will WW choose to produce in this case? How much will BBBS produce? What is the market price, and what is the profit for each firm? Is WW better off by choosing its output first? Explain why or why not.

Suppose all firms in a monopolistically competitive industry were merged into one large firm. Would that new firm produce as many different brands? Would it produce only a single brand? Explain.

Suppose that two competing firms, \(A\) and \(B\), produce a homogeneous good. Both firms have a marginal cost of \(\mathrm{MC}=\$ 50 .\) Describe what would happen to output and price in each of the following situations if the firms are at (i) Cournot equilibrium, (ii) collusive equilibrium, and (iii) Bertrand equilibrium. a. Because Firm \(A\) must increase wages, its \(\mathrm{MC}\) increases to \(\$ 80\). b. The marginal cost of both firms increases. c. The demand curve shifts to the right.

Suppose the airline industry consisted of only two firms: American and Texas Air Corp. Let the two firms have identical cost functions, \(C(q)=40 q\). Assume that the demand curve for the industry is given by \(P=100-Q\) and that each firm expects the other to behave as a Cournot competitor. a. Calculate the Cournot-Nash equilibrium for each firm, assuming that each chooses the output level that maximizes its profits when taking its rival's output as given. What are the profits of each firm? b. What would be the equilibrium quantity if Texas Air had constant marginal and average costs of \(\$ 25\) and American had constant marginal and average costs of \(\$ 40 ?\) c. Assuming that both firms have the original cost function, \(C(q)=40 q,\) how much should Texas Air be willing to invest to lower its marginal cost from 40 to \(25,\) assuming that American will not follow suit? How much should American be willing to spend to reduce its marginal cost to \(25,\) assuming that Texas Air will have marginal costs of 25 regardless of American's actions?

Two firms compete by choosing price. Their demand functions are $$Q_{1}=20-P_{1}+P_{2}$$ and $$Q_{2}=20+P_{1}-P_{2}$$ where \(P_{1}\) and \(P_{2}\) are the prices charged by each firm, respectively, and \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) are the resulting demands. Note that the demand for each good depends only on the difference in prices; if the two firms colluded and set the same price, they could make that price as high as they wanted, and earn infinite profits. Marginal costs are zero. a. Suppose the two firms set their prices at the same time. Find the resulting Nash equilibrium. What price will each firm charge, how much will it sell, and what will its profit be? (Hint: Maximize the profit of each firm with respect to its price. b. Suppose Firm 1 sets its price first and then Firm 2 sets its price. What price will each firm charge, how much will it sell, and what will its profit be? c. Suppose you are one of these firms and that there are three ways you could play the game: (i) Both firms set price at the same time; (ii) You set price first; or (iii) Your competitor sets price first. If you could choose among these options, which would you prefer? Explain why.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free