Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

If the demand for drive-in movies is more elastic for couples than for single individuals, it will be optimal for theaters to charge one admission fee for the driver of the car and an extra fee for passengers. True or false? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Therefore, the statement is True. If the demand for drive-in movies is more elastic for couples than for single individuals, it would be optimal for theaters to charge one admission fee for the driver of the car and an extra fee for passengers. This is because such a strategy can help maintain attendance rates among both types of patrons despite varying price elasticity of demand.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Elasticity

First, it is crucial to examine the idea of elasticity. Elastic demand involves a strong change in demand in response to a change in price. If drive-in movie demand is more elastic for couples than for single people, it implies couples will alter their movie-going habits more dramatically as prices change. For instance, an increased cost might discourage couples more than singles.
02

Price Segmentation

Next, understand that subscribers' willingness to pay differs. Singles have a less elastic demand, implying they'd likely continue to attend even as prices rise. Meanwhile, for couples with more elastic demand, a price increase could result in a significant loss in demand. A method to optimize earnings may be to charge an admission fee for the driver and an additional fee for passengers. In this scenario, even if the total per-car price increases, the individual perceived price for couples (i.e. per person price) could seem lower, stimulating demand.
03

Evaluating the Statement

Once the impacts of pricing on different buyer behavior are well understood, evaluate the statement. Given the elasticity behaviours, it would make sense to give an admission charge for the driver and an extra charge for passengers. The segmentation would allow the theater to maintain demand among couples and not deter singles from attending.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Many retail video stores offer two alternative plans for renting films: A two-part tariff: Pay an annual membership fee (e.g., \(\$ 40\) ) and then pay a small fee for the daily rental of each film (e.g., \(\$ 2\) per film per day). A straight rental fee: Pay no membership fee, but pay a higher daily rental fee (e.g., \$4 per film per day). What is the logic behind the two-part tariff in this case? Why offer the customer a choice of two plans rather than simply a two-part tariff?

Some years ago, an article appeared in the New York Times about IBM's pricing policy. The previous day, IBM had announced major price cuts on most of its small and medium-sized computers. The article said: IBM probably has no choice but to cut prices periodically to get its customers to purchase more and lease less. If they succeed, this could make life more difficult for IBM's major competitors. Outright purchases of computers are needed for ever larger IBM revenues and profits, says Morgan Stanley's Ulric Weil in his new book, Information Systems in the \(80^{\circ}\) s. Mr. Weil declares that IBM cannot revert to an emphasis on leasing. a. Provide a brief but clear argument in support of the claim that IBM should try "to get its customers to purchase more and lease less." b. Provide a brief but clear argument against this claim. c. What factors determine whether leasing or selling is preferable for a company like IBM? Explain briefly.

A monopolist is deciding how to allocate output between two geographically separated markets (East Coast and Midwest), Demand and marginal revenue for the two markets are $$\begin{array}{ll}P_{1}=15-Q_{1} & \mathrm{MR}_{1}=15-2 Q_{1} \\ P_{2}=25-2 Q_{2} & \mathrm{MR}_{2}=25-4 Q_{2}\end{array}$$ The monopolist's total cost is \(C=5+3\left(Q_{1}+Q_{2}\right)\) What are price, output, profits, marginal revenues, and deadweight loss (i) if the monopolist can price discriminate? (ii) if the law prohibits charging different prices in the two regions?

Price discrimination requires the ability to sort customers and the ability to prevent arbitrage. Explain how the following can function as price discrimination schemes and discuss both sorting and arbitrage: a. Requiring airline travelers to spend at least one Saturday night away from home to qualify for a low fare. b. Insisting on delivering cement to buyers and basing prices on buyers' locations. c. Selling food processors along with coupons that can be sent to the manufacturer for a \(\$ 10\) rebate. d. Offering temporary price cuts on bathroom tissue. e. Charging high-income patients more than lowincome patients for plastic surgery.

You are an executive for Super Computer, Inc. (SC), which rents out super computers. SC receives a fixed rental payment per time period in exchange for the right to unlimited computing at a rate of \(P\) cents per second. SC has two types of potential customers of equal number-10 businesses and 10 academic institutions. Each business customer has the demand function \(Q=10-P,\) where \(Q\) is in millions of seconds per month; each academic institution has the demand \(Q=8-P\). The marginal cost to \(\mathrm{SC}\) of additional computing is 2 cents per second, regardless of volume. a. Suppose that you could separate business and academic customers. What rental fee and usage fee would you charge each group? What would be your profits? b. Suppose you were unable to keep the two types of customers separate and charged a zero rental fee. What usage fee would maximize your profits? What would be your profits? c. Suppose you set up one two-part tariff-that is, you set one rental and one usage fee that both business and academic customers pay. What usage and rental fees would you set? What would be your profits? Explain why price would not be equal to marginal cost.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free