Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Will an increase in the demand for a monopolist's product always result in a higher price? Explain. Will an increase in the supply facing a monopsonist buyer always result in a lower price? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In economics, increased demand could lead to higher prices in a monopoly, and increased supply could result in lower prices in a monopsony. However, price changes are not guaranteed in these market situations, and depend on various factors including market conditions, demand and supply elasticity, and the pricing strategy of the monopolist or monopsonist.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Monopolist Price Effects

To analyze the first question, begin by defining a monopoly. In a monopoly, there is only one seller of a particular product. When demand for this product increases (meaning consumers are willing to buy more of it), the monopolist can respond accordingly. They can sell more product at the same price, thus increasing revenues, or they could raise the price, taking advantage of the increased demand. However, this doesn't mean the price will always go up when demand increases. It's a strategic decision made by the monopolist, depending on factors like production costs, potential for higher profits, and demand elasticity.
02

Understanding Monopsonist Price Effects

For the second question, it is necessary to first understand a monopsony. A monopsony exists when there is just one buyer in the market. If the supply (the amount of a product that producers are willing to sell) increases, there is more competition between suppliers to sell their products. This could lead the monopsonist, as the only buyer, to be able to negotiate lower prices. However, similar to the monopolist scenario, this don't mean the price will necessarily go down with increased supply. It also depends on other factors, such as the specific conditions of the market, the elasticity of supply, and the monopsonist's needs and strategies.
03

Consolidating Understanding

Having analyzed both scenarios, the conclusion is that while basic economic principles suggest that an increase in demand could lead to higher prices in a monopoly, and increased supply could result in lower prices in a monopsony, these outcomes are not guaranteed. Both the monopolist and the monopsonist have the ability to strategically choose their prices based on a variety of factors. Ultimately, the impacts of changes in demand and supply on price in these market structures are complex and depend on the specific circumstances and characteristics of each market.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

One of the more important antitrust cases of the 20 th century involved the Aluminum Company of America (Alcoa) in \(1945 .\) At that time, Alcoa controlled about 90 percent of primary aluminum production in the United States, and the company had been accused of monopolizing the aluminum market. In its defense, Alcoa argued that although it indeed controlled a large fraction of the primary market, secondary aluminum (i.e., aluminum produced from the recycling of scrap) accounted for roughly 30 percent of the total supply of aluminum and that many competitive firms were engaged in recycling. Therefore, Alcoa argued, it did not have much monopoly power. a. Provide a clear argument in favor of Alcoa's position. b. Provide a clear argument against Alcoa's position. c. The 1945 decision by Judge Leamed Hand has been called "one of the most celebrated judicial opinions of our time." Do you know what Judge Hand's ruling was?

A firm faces the following average revenue (demand) curve: \\[ P=120-0.02 Q \\] where \(Q\) is weekly production and \(P\) is price, measured in cents per unit. The firm's cost function is given by \(C=\) \(60 Q+25,000 .\) Assume that the firm maximizes profits. a. What is the level of production, price, and total profit per week? b. If the government decides to levy a tax of 14 cents per unit on this product, what will be the new level of production, price, and profit?

Caterpillar Tractor, one of the largest producers of farm machinery in the world, has hired you to advise it on pricing policy. One of the things the company would like to know is how much a 5 -percent increase in price is likely to reduce sales. What would you need to know to help the company with this problem? Explain why these facts are important.

Dayna's Doorstops, Inc. (DD) is a monopolist in the doorstop industry. Its cost is \(C=100-5 Q+Q^{2}\), and demand is \(P=55-2 Q\) a. What price should DD set to maximize profit? What output does the firm produce? How much profit and consumer surplus does DD generate? b. What would output be if \(D D\) acted like a perfect competitor and set \(\mathrm{MC}=P ?\) What profit and consumer surplus would then be generated? c. What is the deadweight loss from monopoly power in part (a)? d. Suppose the government, concerned about the high price of doorstops, sets a maximum price at \(\$ 27\) How does this affect price, quantity, consumer surplus, and DD's profit? What is the resulting deadweight loss? e. Now suppose the government sets the maximum price at \(\$ 23 .\) How does this decision affect price, quantity, consumer surplus, DD's profit, and deadweight loss? f. Finally, consider a maximum price of \(\$ 12 .\) What will this do to quantity, consumer surplus, profit, and deadweight loss?

A drug company has a monopoly on a new patented medicine. The product can be made in either of two plants. The costs of production for the two plants \(\operatorname{arc} \mathrm{MC}_{1}=20+2 \mathrm{Q}_{1}\) and \(\mathrm{MC}_{2}=10+5 \mathrm{Q}_{2}\). The firm'sesti mate of demand for the product is \(P=20-3\left(Q_{1}+Q_{2}\right)\) How much should the firm plan to produce in each plant? At what price should it plan to sell the product?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free