Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In order for trade between two countries to take place, a) absolute advantage is necessary b) comparative advantage is necessary c) both absolute and comparative advantage are necessary d) neither absolute nor comparative advantage is necessary

Short Answer

Expert verified
For trade to occur between two countries, comparative advantage is necessary. Even if a country does not have an absolute advantage, trade can still be mutually beneficial. The key driver for trade is the comparative advantage, where both countries benefit by specializing in goods or services where they have a lower opportunity cost. Therefore, the answer is (b) comparative advantage is necessary. Absolute advantage, although can contribute to trade benefits, it's not a necessary condition for trade.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Absolute Advantage

Absolute advantage is the ability of a country to produce a good or service more efficiently (using fewer resources) than another country. If one country has an absolute advantage in producing a good or service, it can produce that good or service at a lower cost than another country.
02

Definition of Comparative Advantage

Comparative advantage is the ability of a country to produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than another country. Opportunity cost refers to the potential gain that could have been achieved if the resources were allocated to the production of another good or service. A country has a comparative advantage in producing a good or service if it can produce it at a lower opportunity cost than another country.
03

Absolute Advantage and Trade

If a country has an absolute advantage in producing a good or service, it does not necessarily mean that trade will take place. Trade can also occur when one country does not have an absolute advantage if it is still mutually beneficial for both countries to engage in trade.
04

Comparative Advantage and Trade

Comparative advantage is the main driver for trade between two countries. If a country has a comparative advantage in producing a good or service, it is mutually beneficial for both countries to engage in trade, as they can both gain from trade. This is because the country with the comparative advantage can specialize in producing that good or service, while the other country can specialize in producing other goods or services in which it has a comparative advantage.
05

Conclusion

Based on the definitions and the role of absolute and comparative advantage in trade, we can conclude that for trade to occur between two countries, (b) comparative advantage is necessary. Although absolute advantage can contribute to the benefits of trade, it is not a necessary condition for trade to take place.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Absolute Advantage
Absolute advantage is a concept in economics that allows us to gauge which producer can make a product using fewer resources or in greater quantities within the same time frame compared to another producer. For example, if Country A can produce 10 cars with the same resources that it takes Country B to produce 5 cars, Country A has an absolute advantage in producing cars. However, it's crucial to understand that this doesn’t always lead to international trade just because one country is more efficient. This is because trade decisions are often based on comparative advantage instead of absolute advantage.
Absolute advantage can sometimes be straightforward to identify, as it involves looking at the sheer productivity differences between producers. Yet, it's not the ultimate decider in trade relationships. An important takeaway is that having an absolute advantage is beneficial, but it's not a prerequisite for trade to occur between countries.
The Role of Opportunity Cost
Opportunity cost is a key economic concept that involves the cost of what is given up to get something else. Essentially, it's the potential gain from the next best alternative when a choice is made. In terms of international trade, when a country decides to focus on producing one good over another, the value of the goods it didn't produce represents the opportunity cost.
For instance, if Country A uses its resources to create textiles when it could have used those same resources to produce wheat, then the wheat is the opportunity cost of producing textiles. Understanding opportunity costs allows nations to identify their comparative advantages, which, unlike absolute advantages, are the basis of most trade decisions. Countries tend to trade in products that minimizes their opportunity costs, thereby maximizing their production efficiencies.
International Trade Dynamics
International trade involves the exchange of goods, services, and capital across international borders or territories. It is influenced by a myriad of factors, one of which includes the concept of comparative advantage. Comparative advantage encourages countries to specialize in producing certain goods and services at a lower opportunity cost and trade these for other items that would be relatively more costly for them to produce themselves.
Understanding both absolute and comparative advantages is key to grasping international trade dynamics. Trade agreements and policies are often structured around these concepts to enhance economic cooperation between countries. Through international trade, countries can enjoy a wider diversity of goods, leading to increased consumer choice, competitive prices, and more efficient global resource allocation.
Economic Efficiency in Global Markets
Economic efficiency is a goal of markets, and it refers to the optimal allocation and utilization of resources to meet the needs and wants of a society. When markets are efficient, goods and services are produced at the lowest possible cost, and resources are allocated where they are most valued. In the context of international trade, economic efficiency is enhanced when countries engage in trade based on their comparative advantages.
Each nation concentrates on producing goods and services for which it has the lowest opportunity cost, and that it can supply more effectively compared to others. This specialization leads to a more proficient use of global resources, increased output, and a greater overall standard of living. As countries specialize and trade with each other, economic efficiency on a global scale is achieved, illustrating the profound impact of comparative advantage in shaping world economic activity.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which statement is the most accurate? a) Americans are very willing to buy domestically produced goods, even if they are more expensive than imported goods. b) We import more foreign goods than we did 40 years ago, but merchandise imports are still about the same percentage of our GDP. c) In the decades following World War II, the Japanese consumer has strongly favored domestically manufactured goods over imports. d) America has maintained its technological lead.

Of these three choices-tariffs, quotas, and free trade-economists like the most and the least. a) tariffs, quotas d) free trade, quotas b) tariffs, free trade e) quotas, free trade c) free trade, tariffs f) quotas, tariffs

Imports would be lowered by a) tariffs only b) import quotas only c) both tariffs and import quotas d) neither tariffs nor import quotas

Which statement is the most accurate? a) Our economy would be much better off if the entire globalization process were reversed. b) The globalization process creates billions of winners and no losers. c) The process of globalization could easily be reversed if Congress and the president were willing to act. d) Globalization ensures a more efficient allocation of resources throughout the world.

Which statement do you agree with? a) There are several problems causing our huge trade deficit; there are no easy solutions to these problems. b) We could quickly eliminate our trade deficit by raising tariffs. c) The main reason we have a large trade deficit is that foreigners refuse to buy American goods and services. d) The main reason for our large trade deficit is our relatively low rate of economic growth.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free