Chapter 13: Problem 9
The Clayton Antitrust Act prohibited each of the following except a) price discrimination b) interlocking stockholding c) interlocking directorates d) trusts
Short Answer
Expert verified
(d) trusts
Step by step solution
01
Understand the Clayton Antitrust Act
The Clayton Antitrust Act was enacted in 1914 with the aim of strengthening the antitrust laws and preventing the creation of monopolies and unfair business practices. Key provisions of the Act include prohibition of price discrimination, prevention of mergers that substantially lessen competition, and restriction of interlocking directorates.
02
Evaluate Option (a): Price Discrimination
Price discrimination is the practice of charging different buyers different prices for the same goods or services. The Clayton Antitrust Act specifically prohibits this practice to prevent businesses from unfairly exploiting their market dominance.
03
Evaluate Option (b): Interlocking Stockholding
Interlocking stockholding is when one company owns shares in another company, effectively giving the parent company control over the subsidiary. The Clayton Antitrust Act does not explicitly prohibit interlocking stockholding, but it prevents the formation of legal entities (such as holding companies) that could be used to establish and maintain controlling interests in other companies.
04
Evaluate Option (c): Interlocking Directorates
Interlocking directorates occur when a person serves as a director on the boards of two or more competing companies. The Clayton Antitrust Act specifically prohibits this practice to prevent collusion and coordination between competitors.
05
Evaluate Option (d): Trusts
Trusts are legal arrangements in which one party holds the property or assets of another party for the benefit of a third party. While the Clayton Antitrust Act was designed to target anticompetitive practices, it does not explicitly prohibit trusts. Instead, trusts were primarily targeted by the earlier Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, which aimed to prevent the formation of monopolies and trusts that restrained trade.
#Conclusion#
The Clayton Antitrust Act prohibited price discrimination, interlocking directorates, and certain practices that could lead to monopolies, but it did not specifically prohibit trusts. Therefore, the correct answer is:
(d) trusts
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Price Discrimination
Price discrimination is a pricing strategy where a company charges different prices for the same product or service to different customers. The concept is crucial in understanding how businesses can influence and control market pricing to maximize profits. For instance, a software company might charge more for its products in wealthier countries than in developing ones, or offer discounts to students and educators while charging full price to other customers.
Relevance to the Clayton Antitrust Act
In relation to the Clayton Antitrust Act, which is part of U.S. antitrust laws, this practice is prohibited when it lessens competition or creates a monopoly. If a large company uses price discrimination to undermine smaller competitors who cannot afford to offer similar discounts, this could be seen as an unfair business practice. This section of the Act aims to level the playing field and ensure that all businesses, regardless of size, can compete fairly. Essentially, the prohibition of price discrimination protects consumers and businesses alike by encouraging healthy competition and fair pricing.Interlocking Directorates
Interlocking directorates occur when the same individuals serve as directors on the boards of multiple companies, which can be especially problematic if those companies are in direct competition with each other. The concern here is the potential for collusion and shared confidential information that could stifle competition and harm consumer interests.
Impact on Competition and Governance
The Clayton Antitrust Act addressed this concern directly by restricting the practice. Why is this important? Well, if executives from competing firms sit on each other's boards, they may be tempted to make decisions that benefit both companies at the expense of others, or they might agree not to compete in certain areas. By banning interlocking directorates between competitors, the Act aims to foster independent decision-making within companies and promote fair market competition. It's a way of ensuring that companies act independently and compete on their own merits rather than forming de facto alliances through shared board members.Antitrust Laws
Antitrust laws are regulations that encourage competition by restricting monopolistic practices and business arrangements that could lead to market dominance by a single entity. These laws are the foundation for creating a fair marketplace where different businesses can compete without unjust restrictions.
Broad Implications for Business Practices
Starting with the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 and expanded by later legislation, such as the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, these laws play a critical role in regulating business conduct in the economy. They prohibit a variety of anti-competitive behaviors, including monopolies, cartels, and mergers that significantly decrease market competition. Understanding antitrust laws is important for business owners, managers, and consumers, because it helps ensure that no single company can unfairly dominate a market, leading to better prices and choices for consumers.Monopolies and Competition
Monopolies exist when a single company or entity has exclusive control over a commodity or service, often resulting in the limitation of fair competition. Competition, on the other hand, involves the presence of multiple firms vying for the same customers, encouraging innovation, fair pricing, and quality services or products.