Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The Clayton Antitrust Act prohibited each of the following except a) price discrimination b) interlocking stockholding c) interlocking directorates d) trusts

Short Answer

Expert verified
(d) trusts

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Clayton Antitrust Act

The Clayton Antitrust Act was enacted in 1914 with the aim of strengthening the antitrust laws and preventing the creation of monopolies and unfair business practices. Key provisions of the Act include prohibition of price discrimination, prevention of mergers that substantially lessen competition, and restriction of interlocking directorates.
02

Evaluate Option (a): Price Discrimination

Price discrimination is the practice of charging different buyers different prices for the same goods or services. The Clayton Antitrust Act specifically prohibits this practice to prevent businesses from unfairly exploiting their market dominance.
03

Evaluate Option (b): Interlocking Stockholding

Interlocking stockholding is when one company owns shares in another company, effectively giving the parent company control over the subsidiary. The Clayton Antitrust Act does not explicitly prohibit interlocking stockholding, but it prevents the formation of legal entities (such as holding companies) that could be used to establish and maintain controlling interests in other companies.
04

Evaluate Option (c): Interlocking Directorates

Interlocking directorates occur when a person serves as a director on the boards of two or more competing companies. The Clayton Antitrust Act specifically prohibits this practice to prevent collusion and coordination between competitors.
05

Evaluate Option (d): Trusts

Trusts are legal arrangements in which one party holds the property or assets of another party for the benefit of a third party. While the Clayton Antitrust Act was designed to target anticompetitive practices, it does not explicitly prohibit trusts. Instead, trusts were primarily targeted by the earlier Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, which aimed to prevent the formation of monopolies and trusts that restrained trade. #Conclusion# The Clayton Antitrust Act prohibited price discrimination, interlocking directorates, and certain practices that could lead to monopolies, but it did not specifically prohibit trusts. Therefore, the correct answer is: (d) trusts

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Price Discrimination
Price discrimination is a pricing strategy where a company charges different prices for the same product or service to different customers. The concept is crucial in understanding how businesses can influence and control market pricing to maximize profits. For instance, a software company might charge more for its products in wealthier countries than in developing ones, or offer discounts to students and educators while charging full price to other customers.

Relevance to the Clayton Antitrust Act

In relation to the Clayton Antitrust Act, which is part of U.S. antitrust laws, this practice is prohibited when it lessens competition or creates a monopoly. If a large company uses price discrimination to undermine smaller competitors who cannot afford to offer similar discounts, this could be seen as an unfair business practice. This section of the Act aims to level the playing field and ensure that all businesses, regardless of size, can compete fairly. Essentially, the prohibition of price discrimination protects consumers and businesses alike by encouraging healthy competition and fair pricing.
Interlocking Directorates
Interlocking directorates occur when the same individuals serve as directors on the boards of multiple companies, which can be especially problematic if those companies are in direct competition with each other. The concern here is the potential for collusion and shared confidential information that could stifle competition and harm consumer interests.

Impact on Competition and Governance

The Clayton Antitrust Act addressed this concern directly by restricting the practice. Why is this important? Well, if executives from competing firms sit on each other's boards, they may be tempted to make decisions that benefit both companies at the expense of others, or they might agree not to compete in certain areas. By banning interlocking directorates between competitors, the Act aims to foster independent decision-making within companies and promote fair market competition. It's a way of ensuring that companies act independently and compete on their own merits rather than forming de facto alliances through shared board members.
Antitrust Laws
Antitrust laws are regulations that encourage competition by restricting monopolistic practices and business arrangements that could lead to market dominance by a single entity. These laws are the foundation for creating a fair marketplace where different businesses can compete without unjust restrictions.

Broad Implications for Business Practices

Starting with the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 and expanded by later legislation, such as the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, these laws play a critical role in regulating business conduct in the economy. They prohibit a variety of anti-competitive behaviors, including monopolies, cartels, and mergers that significantly decrease market competition. Understanding antitrust laws is important for business owners, managers, and consumers, because it helps ensure that no single company can unfairly dominate a market, leading to better prices and choices for consumers.
Monopolies and Competition
Monopolies exist when a single company or entity has exclusive control over a commodity or service, often resulting in the limitation of fair competition. Competition, on the other hand, involves the presence of multiple firms vying for the same customers, encouraging innovation, fair pricing, and quality services or products.

The Delicate Balance in Market Economies

Through antitrust laws like the Clayton Antitrust Act, governments regulate monopolies to ensure that the market remains competitive. The Act's primary goal is to prevent business practices that could lead to monopolization, such as price discrimination and interlocking directorates, thus fostering a dynamic market where multiple businesses can thrive. The intersection of monopolies and competition is a key factor in achieving a healthy economy, benefiting both the consumer and the overall market efficiency.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Each of the following was a plausible reason for the Justice Department to block a proposed merger between AT\&T and T-Mobile in 2011 except a) It would have left millions of customers without wireless service. b) It would have created a duopoly with Verizon, controlling three-quarters of the wireless market. c) It would have resulted in higher prices and fewer consumer choices. d) It might have resulted in poorer service.

Which statement is the most accurate? a) Corporate fraud invariably involves some form of illegal financial manipulation. b) Corporate fraud is confined almost entirely to the financial services industry. c) Pfizer, which paid a \(\$ 2.3\) billion fine for selling a drug for a use that had not been approved by the Federal Drug Administration, was guilty of corporate fraud. d) Because of the threat of heavy fines and long prison sentences, corporate fraud is no longer a serious problem.

A key passage of the Act stated that "every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, in restraint of commerce among the several states, or with foreign nations, is hereby declared illegal." (LO2) a) Clayton c) U.S. Communications b) FTC d) Sherman

Which statement is false? a) Most of the largest U.S. corporate mergers and acquisitions have occurred since \(1995 .\) b) The U.S. government has stopped only a few mergers from occurring. c) There have been several large banking mergers in recent years. d) Virtually all large mergers have transaction values of more than \(\$ 100\) billion.

Since the early 1980 s the size of companies acquired in mergers has been a) getting smaller b) staying about the same c) getting larger

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free