Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Which of the following is not a strictly rational reason for someone to be interested in a commitment device? [LO 23.3] a. The device can eliminate the timeinconsistency problem. b. By making the decision to restrict choices now, the person saves future effort in deciding among more, but undesirable, choices. c. Restricting choice now eliminates the possibility of considering other, potentially better choices that can't be foreseen right now. d. The device helps the person make the choice that she wants to make right now, but might not make in the future.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option c is not a strictly rational reason.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We need to determine which option among the given choices is not a strictly rational reason for using a commitment device. A commitment device is a choice made now that restrains future behaviors to align with one's long-term goals, often addressing issues like time-inconsistency and decision fatigue.
02

Analyzing Option A

Option (a) states, "The device can eliminate the time-inconsistency problem." This is a common and rational reason for using a commitment device, as time-inconsistency refers to the change in preferences over time, where short-term temptations outweigh long-term goals.
03

Analyzing Option B

Option (b) mentions that "By making the decision to restrict choices now, the person saves future effort in deciding among more, but undesirable, choices." This is also a rational reason because it reduces future decision fatigue by limiting choices to the most beneficial ones upfront.
04

Analyzing Option C

Option (c) explains, "Restricting choice now eliminates the possibility of considering other, potentially better choices that can't be foreseen right now." This mentions a potential downside of commitment devices—it hinders adaptability by not allowing future consideration of unforeseen, possibly better choices, which might not be strictly rational.
05

Analyzing Option D

Option (d) states, "The device helps the person make the choice that she wants to make right now, but might not make in the future." This is also a rational reason because the commitment device ensures consistency with current intentions that align with long-term goals.
06

Conclusion

Based on the analysis, option (c) identifies a potential downside of commitment devices and is therefore not a strictly rational reason. It highlights the loss of flexibility and adaptability in decision-making.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Time-Inconsistency
Time-inconsistency is a fascinating concept that plays a significant role in our decision-making processes. It occurs when our preferences change over time, which can lead us to make decisions that are inconsistent with our long-term goals. Imagine wanting to get fit and setting a goal to exercise every day. However, when it comes time to work out, the temptation to relax or indulge in other pleasures might override this initial intention. This conflict arises because the value we place on immediate rewards can outweigh our commitment to future benefits.
To combat time-inconsistency, people often use commitment devices. These tools help align short-term actions with long-term goals by creating constraints on future behavior. For example, by setting up automatic savings plans or signing gym contracts, individuals are more likely to stick to their goals despite momentary allurements. Overall, understanding and addressing time-inconsistency is crucial for maintaining consistency in our actions toward achieving larger objectives.
Decision Fatigue
Decision fatigue refers to the deteriorating quality of decisions made by an individual after a long session of decision-making. The brain, much like a muscle, tires out when overused. As one makes more decisions throughout the day, their ability to make thoughtful choices decreases, potentially leading to impulsive or poorly thought-out choices. This phenomenon is particularly evident when people face numerous options and alternatives.
Commitment devices can significantly reduce the impact of decision fatigue. By limiting the number of choices and decisions one needs to make over time, commitment devices help conserve mental energy. Whether by pre-committing to healthy meals or planning outfits for the week, these strategies can save individuals from the tiring plethora of choices they would otherwise need to make daily. Thus, commitment devices support maintaining high decision-making quality by alleviating the burden on our cognitive resources over time.
Rational Decision-Making
Rational decision-making involves making choices that are consistent with one's goals, based on logical reasoning and factual evidence. It's an idealized process where decisions are made with full information, clear preferences, and a linear understanding of outcomes. Despite being the goal, true rational decision-making can be challenging due to various psychological biases and emotional influences.
A common tool to enhance rational decision-making is the use of commitment devices. These tools allow individuals to plan and commit to decisions when their decision-making abilities are at their best, ensuring those choices align with their larger life objectives. For example, setting up automated reminders or creating decision rules can steer actions towards rational outcomes by removing more spontaneous and irrational influences.
However, the use of such devices should be balanced with adaptability, considering unforeseen future information or opportunities. Understanding how to effectively employ commitment devices within the framework of rational decision-making aids individuals in navigating complex life choices consistently with their long-term aspirations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In which of the following examples would we see the influence of a default option? (You can choose more than one.) [LO 23.4] a. A doctor recommends continuing treatment, but the ultimate decision of whether to continue treatment is left up to the patient. b. A website automatically checks the option "share my activity with my friends on Facebook" when users sign up. c. Pets from an animal shelter are automatically spayed or neutered unless the owner would prefer them not to be. d. A mobile phone user has to enter a choice at start-up between installing a special feature or not. The user is informed that most people choose to install the special feature.

Which of the following are relevant areas of preference inconsistency that Clocky is able to help? \(\left[\mathrm{LO}_{23} .3\right]\) a. The optimal volume for an alarm. b. What time to go to bed at night. c. What time to wake up in the morning. d. Whether an alarm should be placed on the bedside table or across the room.

In each of the following scenarios, determine whether the change in people's behavior is the result of a nudge or a substantive change in economic incentives. [LO 23.1] a. A country with a low birth rate decides to offer free public child care for kids under the age of five. b. A nonprofit organization runs a highly publicized campaign offering teenage girls a very small symbolic reward (say, \(\$ 5\) ) for each week that they stay in school, come to support group meetings, and avoid pregnancy. c. A country with a rapidly growing population levies steep fines on any family that has more than two children. d. A government agency runs an ad on television informing women about low-cost birthcontrol options.

How much should someone with timeinconsistent preferences be willing to pay for Clocky? [LO 23.3] a. Nothing, because a regular alarm will work just as well. b. Something, because Clocky increases his utility by getting him up at the right time. c. You'd have to pay him to use Clocky, because his utility is decreased by having to get out of bed and search around to shut off the alarm.

Choose the statement that people are more likely to choose based on the framing of the choice. \(\left[\mathrm{LO}_{23} .5\right]\) a. Stock investment: i. Invest in a stock with low uncertainty of return. ii. Invest in a stock with high certainty of return. b. Car purchase: i. Buy a car that costs \(\$ 20,000,\) which is \(\$ 5,000\) cheaper than the next level for that maker. ii. Buy a car that costs \(\$ 20,000,\) which is \(\$ 5,000\) more expensive than the lower level for that maker. c. Movie choice: i. Go to the movie that 100 out of 150 people give a five-star rating. ii. Go to the move that 50 out of 150 people give less than a five-star rating. d. Choice of college class: i. Take a class in which 50 percent of students get an \(A\). ii. Take a class in which 50 percent of students don'\operatorname{tg} e t ~ a n ~ \(\mathrm{A}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free