Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Determine whether each of the following shifts is likely to increase or decrease the prevalence of rent-seeking. [LO 22.5] a. The spread of smartphones enables more widespread access to information. b. Judges strike down a law that forces politicians to report when they receive a gift worth over \(\$ 500\). c. Congress passes a law requiring lobbyists to spend at least two years in another unrelated position before getting hired in government to regulate the industries they were advocating for as lobbyists.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Decrease rent-seeking. b. Increase rent-seeking. c. Decrease rent-seeking.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Rent-Seeking

Rent-seeking involves activities aimed at obtaining financial gains or favorable treatment from the government without contributing productive value to society. Examples include lobbying for favorable regulations or receiving special government privileges.
02

Analyze the Impact of Smartphones

Smartphones enable widespread access to information by providing instant access to a variety of news sources, databases, and informational content. This increases transparency and public awareness, likely reducing opportunities for rent-seeking since informed citizens can hold politicians accountable.
03

Evaluate the Impact of Removing Gift Reporting Laws

When judges strike down a law requiring politicians to report gifts over $500, this reduces transparency and can increase opportunities for rent-seeking. Without mandatory disclosure, politicians may be more inclined to accept gifts in exchange for favorable treatment, as the lack of accountability diminishes public awareness and scrutiny.
04

Assess the Effect of the Lobbying Regulation Law

The law requiring lobbyists to be in unrelated positions for two years before working for the government aims to reduce conflicts of interest and the revolving door between lobbying firms and regulatory agencies. This regulation likely decreases rent-seeking by making it harder for lobbyists to immediately influence policy directly after advocating for particular interests.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Transparency
Transparency is a key factor in reducing rent-seeking behaviors in government and politics. When there is open access to information, it allows for greater scrutiny of government actions and decisions. With transparency, the general public and media can easily monitor political activities and hold public officials accountable for their actions. This diminishes the opportunity for rent-seeking, where individuals or groups might otherwise seek illicit benefits or favoritism from government officials.
For instance, the spread of smartphones has drastically enhanced transparency by providing instant access to a wide array of news and information. This technological advancement increases the public's ability to stay informed and engaged, likely reducing rent-seeking opportunities. When citizens are well-informed, they can challenge corrupt practices and demand accountability, creating an environment where ethically dubious actions are less likely to occur.
In summary, transparency acts as a deterrent to rent-seeking by opening government affairs to public scrutiny, ensuring that public officials serve the interests of society as a whole, rather than a select few.
Lobbying regulation
Effective lobbying regulation is crucial to curtail rent-seeking activities. When lobbying is left unchecked, it can lead to situations where policy decisions are influenced by those with the most resources to exert pressure rather than the general public's best interests. Proper regulations can help to prevent this by setting clear guidelines for how lobbying activities should be conducted.
A specific example is a law imposing a two-year separation between lobbying work and governmental regulatory positions. This regulation is designed to combat the 'revolving door' problem, where lobbyists move back and forth between lobbying firms and regulatory agencies, potentially influencing policy without regard to broader public welfare. By requiring this break in service, it ensures that individuals are not immediately jumping into regulatory positions that could benefit the same industries they were lobbying for. This helps to reduce conflicts of interest and decreases the potential for rent-seeking.
Overall, lobbying regulations, when effectively enforced, can create an environment where policy decisions are made more equitably and transparently, reducing the opportunity for undue influence by special interests.
Government accountability
Government accountability is fundamental in ensuring that public resources are used efficiently and equitably. When officials are held accountable for their actions, it reduces the likelihood of rent-seeking, as there is an expectation to operate with integrity and transparency.
A lack of accountability makes it easier for obscured or unethical practices to go unchecked. For instance, if judges strike down transparency laws, such as those requiring the disclosure of gifts received by politicians, it can lead to increased rent-seeking. Without mandatory reporting, politicians might be more tempted to accept gifts from special interests, as the lack of transparency shields them from potential public outrage.
Yet, when transparency and accountability are prioritized, it fosters trust in government, making it difficult for corrupt practices to persist. Citizens are empowered to demand explanations for governmental decisions and can raise concerns, thus ensuring that the government remains focused on serving public interests rather than private gains. In effect, strong government accountability is a significant deterrent to rent-seeking activities.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Decide which of these labels best fits each of the following situations: rent- seeking, corruption, or bureaucratic capture. (If more than one is potentially applicable, pick the one that is the most narrowly tailored to the scenario.) [LO 22,5] a. A contract manager at a government department is bribed to ensure that his friend's company gets a construction contract even though it was not the lowest bidder. b. A senior-citizens group lobbies the city government to spend more on special public-transit shuttles for the elderly. c. The president appoints a former head of an investment bank to the Securities and Exchange Commission (which oversees capital markets and enforces financial regulations). d. The head of a local teachers' union offers support to a political candidate in exchange for her promise to spend more of the state budget on teacher salaries.

According to the rational voter theory, will the following increase or decrease voter turnout? \(\left[\mathrm{LO}_{22}, 3\right]\) a. Electronic voting machines make the process of casting a ballot faster and less complicated. b. 24 -hour news networks emphasize how close they expect the election to be, with only a few thousand votes deciding the outcome. c. The number of polling stations increases. d. Pollsters predict a landslide victory for the incumbent candidate a few days before the election.

Determine whether each of the following represents rational ignorance. [LO 22.3] a. Doug doesn't know the retum on his retirement account in the last quarter or the types of investments that comprise the account. b. Sally doesn't know about a new provision in nuclear energy regulation, which is decided by a national panel overseen by nuclear physicists. c. Jim doesn't know whether to support new requirements for licensing among city contractors. d. Tom doesn't know the average price of a parking ticket, despite parking on the street every day.

For each of the following, state who benefits and who bears the costs, and whether the costs and benefits are concentrated or diffuse. Based on this assessment, predict which side is likely to get its way. [LO 22.4] a. A rubber producer lobbies the government to. prohibit the import of cheaper foreign rubber, driving up the cost of consumer goods. b. The government increases federal gas taxes by 1 cent per gallon to finance building high-speed train routes between major East. Coast cities.

In a runoff election, if no candidate receives a majority of votes in the first round of voting, the top two candidates face each other in a second round. Let's say that people voting on Candidates A, B, \(C,\) and \(D\) in a runoff election have the following preferences. [LO 22. 2] 12 voters: \(\quad \mathrm{A}>\mathrm{B}>\mathrm{C}>\mathrm{D}\) 8 voters: \(\quad C>B>D>A\) 10 voters: \(\quad \mathrm{D}>\mathrm{B}>\mathrm{C}>\mathrm{A}\) 4 voters: \(\quad \mathrm{B}>\mathrm{D}>\mathrm{A}>\mathrm{C}\) a. Does anyone receive an outright majority in the first round? If so, which candidate? If not, which two candidates move on to the second round, and which of them wins? b. Suppose Candidate A drops out of the race. Does any candidate now receive an outright majority in the first round? If so, which candidate? If not, which two candidates move on to the second round, and which of them wins? c. Does this situation violate the independence of irrelevant alternatives?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free