Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider community safety or defense, meaning freedom from crime and threats, to answer the following questions. [LO 19.2] a. What sort of good is community safety? b. If you lived in a place with no governmentfunded police force, would you expect community safety to be oversupplied or undersupplied? c. Suppose that some neighbors get together and organize a block watch group. What term do economists use to describe someone who lives in the neighborhood but chooses not to volunteer as part of the block watch?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. A public good. b. Undersupplied. c. Free-rider.

Step by step solution

01

- Identify the Type of Good

Community safety, especially from crime and threats, is considered a public good. Public goods are non-excludable and non-rivalrous; this means you cannot prevent people who do not pay for the good from using it, and one person's use of the good does not reduce its availability to others. Thus, community safety fits this description as it benefits all individuals in the community, regardless of their contribution.
02

- Analyze Supply Without Government Intervention

In places without a government-funded police force, community safety would likely be undersupplied. Public goods, like community safety, often suffer from the free-rider problem, where individuals have little incentive to pay for the good themselves if they can benefit from others' contributions. This typically results in less of the good being provided than is socially optimal.
03

- Define Free-Rider Problem

In the context of neighbors forming a block watch group, an individual who benefits from the increased safety brought about by the group but does not contribute or volunteer is known as a 'free-rider.' Economists define a free-rider as someone who obtains benefit from public goods without contributing to their provision.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Free-Rider Problem
The free-rider problem occurs when people receive the benefit of a good without having to pay for it. Imagine a group of neighbors forming a block watch to ensure the safety of their street. Some individuals might decide not to participate or contribute to the watch. Yet, they still enjoy the peace and security it provides. This behavior is an example of the free-rider problem.
The free-rider issue is common with public goods. These goods can be accessed by everyone, whether they contribute to their cost or not. This can lead to the good being under-provided since not enough people voluntarily pay for it. In this case, there might be fewer people willing to join the block watch or fund its activities.
To overcome the free-rider problem, communities often rely on taxation or mandatory fees, ensuring everyone contributes fairly to public goods. This approach helps to supply these goods appropriately.
Non-Excludable
A non-excludable good is something that is available for everyone to use. Once it is provided, it's challenging to prevent people from using it, even if they haven't paid for it.
Consider community safety as an example. When a neighborhood block watch keeps an area safe, every resident enjoys the reduced crime. No one in the community can be excluded from this benefit, making it non-excludable.
Non-excludability often causes funding issues, similar to the free-rider problem. It becomes difficult to encourage everyone to contribute financially since they know they will receive the benefit regardless of whether they pay. This characteristic necessitates unique funding strategies, such as government programs, to ensure adequate provision of non-excludable goods.
Non-Rivalrous
Non-rivalrous goods can be consumed by one person without making them less available to another. Think about a bright streetlight illuminating a street. One person using the light doesn't prevent others from using it too.
Community safety shares this trait. When a community becomes safer due to policing or a watch group, everyone in the area enjoys this safety simultaneously. A safer environment for one resident does not reduce the safety for another.
This aspect of non-rivalrous goods means they do not experience depletion from use. But coupled with non-excludability, it leads to problems like the free-rider issue, where people benefit without contributing. Understanding these characteristics can help devise better policies to manage public goods efficiently.
Community Safety
Community safety is crucial as it ensures a peaceful and secure environment for all its residents. It is considered a public good because of its non-excludable and non-rivalrous nature.
For instance, in a neighborhood with robust safety measures, everyone benefits from the decrease in crime even if they did not contribute to the safety infrastructure. This makes community safety a shared responsibility.
Without sufficient support, community safety might suffer. If a government-funded police force isn't available, communities might face undersupply issues. This is often due to the free-rider problem, where many rely on others to enhance safety. Hence, strategic approaches and community participation become vital to maintaining and enhancing safety.
Addressing community safety requires collective efforts and sometimes, intervention through taxes or local initiatives can maintain necessary safety levels for all.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which of the following subway announcements are attempts to establish or enforce a social norm? \(\left[\mathrm{LO}_{19.4}\right]\) a. "Loud music and phone conversations are discourteous to fellow riders. Please keep the noise down." b. "If you see something, say something." c. "Please watch your step as you exit. Be careful of the gap between the train and the platform edge." d. "Please be patient and allow others to exit the train before you attempt to enter." e. "The train is being held at the station due to traffic ahead. We apologize for the inconvenience."

Determine whether each of the following policy interventions is designed to increase supply or decrease demand for a public good or common resource. a. A city government increases the frequency of street sweeping. b. London begins charging a toll to all vehicles that drive within the city limits. c. A gated community passes a bylaw requiring all homeowners to mow their lawns once a week during the summer. d. The National Park Service increases the cost of a pass to enter the Everglades.

From the list below, which of the following do you expect to suffer from a free-rider problem? Check all that apply. [LO 19.2 ] a. Pay-what-you-can yoga classes. b. Unlimited yoga classes with monthly membership dues. c. Fundraiser for public television. d. Neighborhood park cleanup day. e. Housecleaning business operating in your neighborhood. f. Suggested museum-admission donation.

For each of the following examples, state which of these approaches is being taken to manage a common resource or supply a public good: social norms, quota, tradable allowance, government provision, or property rights. a. A nonprofit organization spray-paints signs on storm drains reminding everyone that it "drains to the ocean" with a picture of a fish. b. A city starts a free program that collects recyclable glass, paper, and plastic from residents doorsteps. c. In England, municipal-waste authorities are given a percentage of an overall limit that can be put in the landfill each year. These percentages can be traded among municipalities. d. American bison, which once roamed freely across the Great Plains, are now raised on ranches for commercial purposes.

Public-opinion polls in a small city have revealed that citizens want more resources spent on public safety, an annual fireworks display, and more community swimming pools. Which of these three citizen requests could be privatized by assigning property rights?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free