Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Problem \(8.5,\) Ms. Fogg was quite willing to buy insurance against a 25 percent chance of losing \(\$ 1,000\) of her cash on her around-the-world trip. Suppose that people who buy such insurance tend to become more careless with their cash and that their probability of losing \(\$ 1,000\) rises to 30 percent. What is the actuarially fair insurance premium in this situation? Will Ms. Fogg buy insurance now? (Note: This problem and Problem 9.3 illustrate moral hazard.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The actuarially fair insurance premium for a 30% probability of losing $1,000 is $300. Ms. Fogg's decision to purchase insurance depends on her risk tolerance, as her expected loss with or without insurance is the same (\$300). If she is risk-averse, she will likely buy insurance; if she is risk-neutral or risk-seeking, she may choose not to buy insurance.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the actuarially fair insurance premium

To determine the actuarially fair insurance premium, we can use the formula: Actuarially fair insurance premium = Probability of loss × Amount of loss In our case, the probability of loss has increased to 30%, and the amount of loss remains $1,000. Actuarially fair insurance premium = 0.3 × \(1,000 = \)300
02

Evaluate Ms. Fogg's decision in purchasing insurance

To determine if Ms. Fogg would still buy insurance, we need to compare her expected loss without insurance and her expected loss with insurance. 1. Without insurance: Expected loss = Probability of loss × Amount of loss Expected loss = 0.3 × \(1,000 = \)300 2. With insurance: Expected loss = Insurance premium + (Probability of loss × Excess amount) Since the insurance premium is actuarially fair, and the excess amount is zero, the expected loss with insurance is equal to the insurance premium. Expected loss with insurance = $300 The expected loss with or without insurance remains the same (\(300). The decision to purchase insurance depends on Ms. Fogg's risk tolerance. If she is risk-averse and prefers paying the premium to avoid the potential of a higher loss, she will buy insurance. If she is risk-neutral or risk-seeking and can bear the risk of potentially losing all \)1,000, she may choose not to buy insurance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Actuarially Fair Insurance Premium
An actuarially fair insurance premium is a concept from economics and insurance that helps determine the true cost of an insurance policy. It's calculated by multiplying the probability of an event happening by the amount of loss that event would cause. This ensures the insurance company collects enough premiums to cover potential payouts.

In Ms. Fogg's case, with a 30% probability of losing $1,000, the actuarially fair insurance premium is 0.3 multiplied by $1,000, which equals $300. This calculation shows the premium amount that would fairly cover the average expected loss, without any added cost for administrative expenses or the insurer’s profit. It's a useful benchmark for understanding whether the insurance premium being charged is reasonable or inflated beyond the risk being insured.

This situation illustrates a critical insurance principle: the premium must reflect the underlying risk. When the probability of loss changes, as it did for Ms. Fogg (from 25% to 30%), the actuarially fair premium adjusts accordingly to reflect the increased risk.
Risk Aversion
Risk aversion describes a person's tendency to prefer certainty over uncertainty, even if potentially rewarding. Individuals who are risk-averse would rather avoid uncertainty by making choices that offer predictable outcomes, rather than gambling on possibilities with high variance in potential results.

In deciding whether to purchase an insurance policy, a risk-averse individual like Ms. Fogg might opt to pay the actuarially fair premium. This eliminates the chance of a huge financial loss in case the unfortunate event occurs. The idea is to trade the anxiety of potential larger loss for the certainty of a smaller known cost, which is the premium.

Risk aversion is fundamental in understanding why people buy insurance: they prefer the certainty of paying a premium over the uncertain prospect of incurring a substantial loss. For Ms. Fogg, buying insurance becomes a matter of balancing her risk aversion against the cost of the premium and the potential for loss. If her preference is for financial security, she might willingly accept the actuarially fair premium as a rational choice.
Probability of Loss
The probability of loss is a measure of the likelihood that a certain adverse event, such as losing cash during a trip, will occur. This concept is crucial for determining insurance premiums and assessing risk.

In Ms. Fogg's scenario, the probability of loss initially was 25%, but because of a phenomenon called moral hazard, it increased to 30% when she considered buying insurance. Moral hazard occurs when having insurance leads someone to take more risks, because they feel financially protected.

Understanding the probability of loss helps in the realistic assessment of risk and the formulation of insurance offerings. When there's a rise in the probability, as with Ms. Fogg, it affects the actuarially fair premium, increasing the cost of coverage to match the higher risk. For prospective buyers, knowing this probability enables smarter decisions by weighing the risk against the cost of insurance, ensuring it aligns with their financial strategy and risk tolerance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Problem 8.4 examined a cost-sharing health insurance policy and showed that risk-averse individuals would prefer full coverage. Suppose, however, that people who buy cost-sharing policies take better care of their own health so that the loss suffered when they are ill is reduced from \(\$ 10,000\) to \(\$ 7,000 .\) Now what would be the actuarial fair price of a cost-sharing policy? Is it possible that some individuals might prefer the cost-sharing policy to complete coverage? What would determine whether an individual had such preferences? (A graphical approach to this problem should suffice.)

Suppose an individual knows that the prices of a particular color TV have a uniform distribution between \(\$ 300\) and \(\$ 400\). The individual sets out to obtain price quotes by phone. a. Calculate the expected minimum price paid if this individual calls \(n\) stores for price quotes. b. Show that the expected price paid declines with \(n\), but at a diminishing rate. c. Suppose phone calls cost \(\$ 2\) in terms of time and effort. How many calls should this individual make in order to maximize his or her gain from search?

A farmer's tomato crop is wilting, and he must decide whether to water it. If he waters the tomatoes, or if it rains, the crop will yield \(\$ 1,000\) in profits; but if the tomatoes get no water, they will yield only \(\$ 500 .\) Operation of the farmer's irrigation system costs \(\$ 100 .\) The farmer seeks to maximize expected profits from tomato sales. a. If the farmer believes there is a 50 percent chance of rain, should he water? b. What is the maximum amount the farmer would pay to get information from an itinerant weather forecaster who can predict rain with 100 percent accuracy? c. How would your answer to part (b) change if the forecaster were only 75 percentaccurate?

Suppose there are two types of workers, high-ability workers and low-ability workers. Workers' wages are determined by their ability- high ability workers earn \(\$ 50,000\) per year, lowability workers earn \(\$ 30,000 .\) Firms cannot measure workers' abilities but they can observe whether a worker has a high school diploma. Workers' utility depends on the difference between their wages and the costs they incur in obtaining a diploma. a. If the cost of obtaining a high school diploma is the same for high-ability and low-ability workers, can there be a separating equilibrium in this situation in which high-ability workers get high-wage jobs and low-ability workers get low wages? b. What is the maximum amount that a high-ability worker would pay to obtain a high school diploma? Why must a diploma cost more than this for a low-ability person if having a diploma is to permit employers to identify high-ability workers?

Blue-eyed people are more likely to lose their expensive watches than are brown-eyed people. Specifically, there is an 80 percent probability that a blue-eyed individual will lose a \(\$ 1,000\) watch during a year, but only a 20 percent probability that a brown-eyed person will. Blue-eyed and brown-eyed people are equally represented in the population. a. If an insurance company assumes blue-eyed and brown-eyed people are equally likely to buy watch-loss insurance, what will the actuarially fair insurance premium be? b. If blue-eyed and brown-eyed people have logarithmic utility-of-wealth functions and current wealths of \(\$ 10,000\) each, will these individuals buy watch insurance at the premium calculated in part (a)? c. Given your results from part (b), will the insurance premiums be correctly computed? What should the premium be? What will the utility for each type of person be? d. Suppose that an insurance company charged different premiums for blue-eyed and brown-eyed people. How would these individuals' maximum utilities compare to those computed in parts (b) and (c)? (This problem is an example of adverse selection in insurance.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free