Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose the production possibility frontier for an economy that produces one public good \((P)\) and one private good \((G)\) is given by $$G^{2}+100 P^{2}=5,000$$ This economy is populated by 100 identical individuals, each with a utility function of the form utility \(=\sqrt{G_{i} P}\) where \(G\), is the individual's share of private good production \((=G / 100) .\) Notice that the public good is nonexclusive and that everyone benefits equally from its level of production. a. If the market for \(G\) and \(P\) were perfectly competitive, what levels of those goods would be produced? What would the typical individual's utility be in this situation? b. What are the optimal production levels for \(G\) and \(P\) ? What would the typical individual's utility level be? How should consumption of good \(G\) be taxed to achieve this result? (Hint: The numbers in this problem do not come out evenly, and some approximations should suffice.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
b. What are the optimal production levels for goods P and G, what is the utility level of the typical individual, and how could a tax on good G be used to achieve this result?

Step by step solution

01

Set up the problem and rewrite the utility function

Since each individual's share of private good production is \(G_i = \frac{G}{100}\), then we can rewrite the utility function as: $$U =\sqrt{\frac{G}{100} P}$$
02

Find the points on the PPF where the utility function is maximized

To maximize utility function, we will use the method of Lagrange multipliers with the constraint as the given PPF equation. The maximization problem can be stated as: $$L = \sqrt{\frac{G}{100} P} + \lambda(5,000-G^{2} - 100P^{2})$$ Differentiate with respect to \(G\), \(P\), and \(\lambda\) to find the first-order conditions: $$\frac{\partial L}{\partial G} = \frac{P}{200\sqrt{\frac{G}{100} P}} - 2G\lambda = 0$$ $$\frac{\partial L}{\partial P} = \frac{G}{100\sqrt{\frac{G}{100} P}} - 200P\lambda = 0$$ $$\frac{\partial L}{\partial \lambda} = 5,000-G^{2} - 100P^{2} = 0$$ Solve these equations to find the perfectly competitive and optimal levels of private and public goods production \((G_c, P_c)\) and \((G_o, P_o)\).
03

Calculate utility levels and the required tax

Using the production levels for perfectly competitive and optimal scenarios, calculate the corresponding utility levels for the typical individual: $$U_c =\sqrt{\frac{G_c}{100} P_c}$$ $$U_o =\sqrt{\frac{G_o}{100} P_o}$$ To find the tax necessary to achieve the optimal result, we need to find the difference in marginal costs between the optimal and competitive scenarios: $$\text{Tax} = \frac{\partial G_o}{\partial P_o} - \frac{\partial G_c}{\partial P_c}$$ To calculate the tax rate, we should first find the optimal and competitive marginal rates of transformation (MRT) by finding the ratio of marginal productivity of the public goods and private goods: $$\text{MRT} = \frac{\partial G}{\partial P}$$ Then, compute the tax rate as the difference of MRTs: $$\text{Tax Rate} = \text{MRT}_{optimal} - \text{MRT}_{competitive}$$ Now we have all the desired values: production levels of \(G\) and \(P\) in a perfectly competitive scenario and their optimal levels, utility levels of the typical individual in both situations, and the tax required to achieve the optimal result.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The analysis of public goods in Chapter 24 exclusively used a model with only two individuals. The results are readily generalized to \(n\) persons- a generalization pursued in this problem. a. With \(n\) persons in an economy, what is the condition for efficient production of a public good? Explain how the characteristics of the public good are reflected in these conditions? b. What is the Nash equilibrium in the provision of this public good to \(n\) persons? Explain why this equilibrium is inefficient. Also explain why the under-provision of this public good is more severe than in the two person cases studied in the chapter. c. How is the Lindahl solution generalized to \(n\) persons? Is the existence of a Lindahl equilibrium guaranteed in this more complex model?

Suppose a monopoly produces a harmful externality. Use the concept of consumer surplus to analyze whether an optimal tax on the polluter would necessarily be a welfare improvement

Suppose there are only two individuals in society. The demand curve for mosquito control for person A is given by $$q_{a}=100-P$$ For person \(\mathrm{B}\) the demand curve for mosquito control is given by $$q_{b}=200-P$$ a. Suppose mosquito control is a pure public good; that is, once it is produced, everyone benefits from it. What would be the optimal level of this activity if it could be produced at a constant marginal cost of \(\$ 120\) per unit? b. If mosquito control were left to the private market, how much might be produced? Does your answer depend on what each person assumes the other will do? c. If the government were to produce the optimal amount of mosquito control, how much will this cost? How should the tax bill for this amount be allocated between the individuals if they are to share it in proportion to benefits received from mosquito control?

There is considerable legal controversy about product safety. Two extreme positions might be termed caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) and caveat vendor (let the seller beware). Under the former scheme producers would have no responsibility for the safety of their products: buyers would absorb all losses. Under the latter scheme this liability assignment would be reversed: firms would be completely responsible under law for losses incurred from unsafe products. Using simple supply and demand analysis, discuss how the assignment of such liability might affect the allocation of resources. Would safer products be produced if firms were strictly liable under law? How do possible information asymmetries affect your results?

On the island of Pago Pago there are 2 lakes and 20 anglers. Each angler can fish on either lake and keep the average catch on his particular lake. On Lake \(X\) the total number of fish caught is given by $$F^{x}=10 L_{x}-\frac{1}{2} L_{x}^{2}$$ where \(L_{x}\) is the number of people fishing on the lake. For I ake \(Y\) the relationship is a. Under this organization of society, what will be the total number of fish caught? b. The chief of Pago Pago, having once read an economics book, believes it is possible to raise the total number of fish caught by restricting the number of people allowed to fish on Lake \(X\). What number should be allowed to fish on Lake \(X\) to maximize the total catch of fish? What is the number of fish caught in this situation? c. Being basically opposed to coercion, the chief decides to require a fishing license for Lake \(X\). If the licensing procedure is to bring about the optimal allocation of labor, what should the cost of a license be (in terms of fish)? d. Explain how this example sheds light on the connection between property rights and externalities.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free