Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose the oil industry in Utopia is perfectly competitive and that all firms draw oil from a single (and practically inexhaustible) pool. Assume that each competitor believes that he or she can sell all the oil he or she can produce at a stable world price of \(\$ 10\) per barrel and that the cost of operating a well for one year is \(\$ 1,000\). Total output per year (Q) of the oil field is a function of the number of wells ( \(N\) ) operating in the field. In particular, $$Q=500 N-N^{2}$$ and the amount of oil produced by each well \((q)\) is given by $$q=\frac{Q}{N}=500-N$$ a. Describe the equilibrium output and the equilibrium number of wells in this perfectly competitive case. Is there a divergence between private and social marginal cost in the industry? b. Suppose now that the government nationalizes the oil field. How many oil wells should it operate? What will total output be? What will the output per well be? c. \(\quad\) As an alternative to nationalization, the Utopian government is considering an annual license fee per well to discourage overdrilling. How large should this license fee be if it is to prompt the industry to drill the optimal number of wells?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: In the equilibrium, firms produce as much oil as possible with no additional costs. The optimal number of wells for maximizing social welfare is 250, with a total output of 62,500 barrels and output per well of 250 barrels. To achieve the optimal number of wells, the government should impose a license fee of $10 per well.

Step by step solution

01

a. Equilibrium Output and Equilibrium Number of Wells

To find the equilibrium output and the equilibrium number of wells, we need to find where marginal cost equals marginal revenue. In a perfectly competitive market, every firm faces the same price, so the marginal revenue is simply the world price of \(\$ 10\) per barrel. To determine the marginal cost per well, we first need to find the average cost per well, which is given by: $$AC = \frac{Total \, cost}{quantity} = \frac{1,000}{q}$$ Next, we find the marginal cost: $$MC = \frac{d(Total \, cost)}{dq} = \frac{d(AC \times q)}{dq} = \frac{d(\frac{1,000}{q} \times q)}{dq} = \frac{d(1,000)}{dq} = 0$$ Given that the marginal cost is zero and the marginal revenue is \(\$ 10\), we reach the equilibrium at the point where the firms produce as much as they can without the marginal cost exceeding the marginal revenue. In other words, the firms will keep producing more oil as long as the price remains at \(\$ 10\) without incurring additional costs. Calculate equilibrium quantity and the number of wells using: $$q=500-N$$ $$N_{equilibrium}=500-q_{equilibrium}$$ For the equilibrium output, the q is not bound by N, so the companies will tend to produce as much as possible given the constraints. The social marginal cost in this case is the same as private as there is no external cost, so there is no divergence.
02

b. Optimal Number of Wells, Total Output, and Output per Well

If the government nationalizes the oil field, they will maximize social welfare rather than profit. Since there are no external costs, the government will also aim to produce where MC=MR. Under this condition, the optimal number of wells (N) can be determined by setting q to maximize total output: $$Q=500 N-N^2$$ Then, we can find the maximum value of Q by taking the derivative and setting it to zero: $$\frac{d(Q)}{d(N)}=500-2N=0$$ Solve for N: $$N_{optimal}=250$$ Now, we can determine total output and output per well: $$Q_{optimal}=500 N_{optimal}-N_{optimal}^2$$ $$Q_{optimal}=500(250)-(250^2)=62500$$ And: $$q_{optimal}=\frac{Q_{optimal}}{N_{optimal}}$$ $$q_{optimal}=\frac{62,500}{250}=250$$
03

c. License Fee for Optimal Number of Wells

To encourage the optimal number of wells, the government has to make it costly for firms to operate more wells than the socially optimal number (250). Therefore, we need to find the license fee that makes the marginal cost of drilling additional wells equal to the marginal benefit from producing more oil. Let's call the license fee L, then the new average cost of operating a well is: $$AC = \frac{1,000+L}{q}$$ The new marginal cost is: $$MC_L = \frac{d(AC \times q)_L}{dq} = \frac{d(\frac{1,000+L}{q} \times q)}{dq} = \frac{d(1,000+L)}{dq} = 0$$ Now, we need to find L such that MC_L = MR at the optimal output level q_optimal: $$MC_L = 10$$ $$0 + L = 10$$ $$L=\$10$$ The Utopian government should impose a license fee of \(\$10\) per well to encourage the optimal number of wells.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose there are \(N\) individuals in an economy with three goods. Two of the goods are pure (nonexclusive) public goods, whereas the third is an ordinary private good. a. What conditions must hold for resources to be allocated efficiently between either of the public goods and the private good? b. What conditions must hold for resources to be allocated efficiently between the two public goods?

Suppose there are only two individuals in society. The demand curve for mosquito control for person A is given by $$q_{a}=100-P$$ For person \(\mathrm{B}\) the demand curve for mosquito control is given by $$q_{b}=200-P$$ a. Suppose mosquito control is a pure public good; that is, once it is produced, everyone benefits from it. What would be the optimal level of this activity if it could be produced at a constant marginal cost of \(\$ 120\) per unit? b. If mosquito control were left to the private market, how much might be produced? Does your answer depend on what each person assumes the other will do? c. If the government were to produce the optimal amount of mosquito control, how much will this cost? How should the tax bill for this amount be allocated between the individuals if they are to share it in proportion to benefits received from mosquito control?

The analysis of public goods in Chapter 24 exclusively used a model with only two individuals. The results are readily generalized to \(n\) persons- a generalization pursued in this problem. a. With \(n\) persons in an economy, what is the condition for efficient production of a public good? Explain how the characteristics of the public good are reflected in these conditions? b. What is the Nash equilibrium in the provision of this public good to \(n\) persons? Explain why this equilibrium is inefficient. Also explain why the under-provision of this public good is more severe than in the two person cases studied in the chapter. c. How is the Lindahl solution generalized to \(n\) persons? Is the existence of a Lindahl equilibrium guaranteed in this more complex model?

On the island of Pago Pago there are 2 lakes and 20 anglers. Each angler can fish on either lake and keep the average catch on his particular lake. On Lake \(X\) the total number of fish caught is given by $$F^{x}=10 L_{x}-\frac{1}{2} L_{x}^{2}$$ where \(L_{x}\) is the number of people fishing on the lake. For I ake \(Y\) the relationship is a. Under this organization of society, what will be the total number of fish caught? b. The chief of Pago Pago, having once read an economics book, believes it is possible to raise the total number of fish caught by restricting the number of people allowed to fish on Lake \(X\). What number should be allowed to fish on Lake \(X\) to maximize the total catch of fish? What is the number of fish caught in this situation? c. Being basically opposed to coercion, the chief decides to require a fishing license for Lake \(X\). If the licensing procedure is to bring about the optimal allocation of labor, what should the cost of a license be (in terms of fish)? d. Explain how this example sheds light on the connection between property rights and externalities.

Suppose a monopoly produces a harmful externality. Use the concept of consumer surplus to analyze whether an optimal tax on the polluter would necessarily be a welfare improvement

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free