Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The town of Podunk has decided to provide security services to its residents by hiring workers \((L)\) and guard dogs \((D) .\) Security services \((S)\) are produced according to the production function \\[ S=\sqrt{L D} \\] and residents of the town wish to consume 10 units of such services per period. a. Suppose that \(L\) and \(D\) both rent for \(\$ 1\) per period. How much of each input should the town hire to produce the desired services at minimal cost? What will that cost be? b. Suppose now that Podunk is the only hirer of people who work with guard dogs and that the supply curve for such workers is given by \\[ \boldsymbol{L}=\mathbf{1} 0 w \\] where \(w\) is the per-period wage of guard dog handlers. If dogs continue to rent for \(\$ 1\) per period, how much of each input should the town hire to produce the desired services at minimal cost? What will those costs be? What will the wage rate of dog handlers be?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The town of Podunk should hire 10 workers and 10 guard dogs to produce 10 units of security services at a minimal cost of 20.

Step by step solution

01

Set up the minimization problem

In order to find the minimum cost for producing the desired services, we need to set up a minimization problem. We are given that residents wish to consume 10 units of security services, so we can write the problem as: \(\min L, D : L + D\) subject to \(S = \sqrt{LD} = 10\)
02

Use the Lagrange multiplier method

To solve this minimization problem, we can use the Lagrange multiplier method. The objective function is \(L + D\), and we have a constraint on the security services produced. So, we can write the Langrange function as: \(L(D, L, \lambda) = L + D + \lambda(10 - \sqrt{LD})\) Take partial derivatives with respect to \(L\), \(D\), and \(\lambda\) and set them equal to zero to find optimal values: 1. \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial D} = 1 - \lambda \frac{L}{2\sqrt{LD}} = 0\) 2. \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial L} = 1 - \lambda \frac{D}{2\sqrt{LD}} = 0\) 3. \(10 - \sqrt{LD} = 0\)
03

Solve the system of equations

Now we need to solve the system of equations. From equations 1 and 2, we can derive the following equation: \(\frac{L}{D} = \frac{1}{1} \Rightarrow L = D\) Putting this equation back into equation 3: \(10 = \sqrt{L \cdot D} = \sqrt{L^2} \Rightarrow L^2 = 100 \Rightarrow L = 10\) Since \(L = D\), we also have \(D = 10\).
04

Calculate the cost

Now that we know we need 10 workers and 10 guard dogs to produce 10 units of security services at minimal cost, we can find the cost. Since both inputs rent for \(1\) per period, the total cost will be: \(C = L + D = 10 + 10 = 20\) So, the town should hire 10 workers and 10 guard dogs at a total cost of \(20\). b.Solving for the ideal input combination with separate rental prices for the inputs
05

Set up the minimization problem

The minimization problem now becomes: \(\min L, D : wL + D\) subject to \(S = \sqrt{LD} = 10\) and \(L = 10w\)
06

Use the Lagrange multiplier method

We can write the Lagrange function as: \(L(D, L, \lambda) = wL + D + \lambda(10 - \sqrt{LD})\) Take partial derivatives with respect to \(L\), \(D\), and \(\lambda\): 1. \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial D} = w - \lambda \frac{L}{2\sqrt{LD}} = 0\) 2. \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial L} = 1 - \lambda \frac{D}{2\sqrt{LD}} = 0\) 3. \(10 - \sqrt{LD} = 0\)
07

Solve the system of equations

Using the given supply curve, \(L = 10w\), we can derive the following equations from the system of equations: 1. \(\frac{w}{1} = \frac{D}{L} \Rightarrow w = \frac{D}{L} = \frac{D}{10w} \Rightarrow w^2 = \frac{D}{10}\) 2. \(\frac{L}{D} = \frac{10w}{D} = \frac{w}{1} \Rightarrow D = 10w^2\) Plugging this equation into equation 3: \(10 = \sqrt{L \cdot D} = \sqrt{10w \cdot 10w^2} \Rightarrow 10w^3 = 10\) So, \(w^3 = 1\), which implies \(w = 1\). Now that we know the wage rate for dog handlers, we can find \(L\) and \(D\): \(L = 10w = 10\) \(D = 10w^2 = 10\)
08

Calculate the cost

Now that we have the new values for \(L\), \(D\), and \(w\), we can find the total cost for the town of Podunk: \(C = wL + D = 1 \cdot 10 + 10 = 20\) We find out that in both scenarios (a) and (b), the town of Podunk should hire 10 workers and 10 guard dogs to produce 10 units of security services at a minimal cost of \(20\). In the second scenario, the wage rate of dog handlers would be \(1\) per period.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Production Function
In microeconomic theory, a production function provides a powerful tool to understand how inputs are transformed into outputs. As demonstrated in the Podunk town's scenario, the security services (S) are produced by combining workers (L) and guard dogs (D) effectively. The specific equation given,
\[ S = \sqrt{LD} \]
shows a production function where the output (security services) increases with the square root of the product of the two inputs (workers and guard dogs). This type of function implies increasing returns to scale, to a point, since doubling both inputs will more than double the output.

The importance of production functions extends beyond theoretical exercises and into real-world applications. Businesses use them to estimate the optimal levels of inputs needed to maximize production or, as in the case of Podunk, minimize costs while producing a desired level of output. Understanding the shape and properties of a production function can help in economic decision-making, forecasting, and strategic planning.
Tackling the Minimization Problem
Often in economics, the goal isn't just to produce but to do so efficiently, managing scarce resources. This leads us to a minimization problem, which the town of Podunk faces while trying to produce 10 units of security services. It includes finding the quantity of inputs (L and D) that minimizes costs.

To solve such problems, setting up the optimization model correctly is crucial. For Podunk, the objective is to minimize the cost (L + D) subject to the constraint that the production function equals the desired output:
\[ S = \sqrt{LD} = 10 \]
This reflects a balance between economic efficiency (spending the least amount of resources) and production needs (meeting the consumption demand). Real-world applications include cost-cutting strategies, resources allocation in production, or even designing minimal waste processes in manufacturing.
Applying the Lagrange Multiplier Method
To solve optimization problems with constraints, like the Podunk case, economists often employ the Lagrange multiplier method. This technique provides a systematic way to include constraints within an optimization problem.

The process involves creating a new function, the Lagrange function, which is a combination of the original objective function and the production function constraint. For Podunk, the Lagrange function formulated:
\[ L(D, L, \lambda) = L + D + \lambda(10 - \sqrt{LD}) \]
allows the town to account for the costs while ensuring the production level remains fixed.

By taking partial derivatives of the function with respect to each variable and setting them to zero, we calculate the optimal values that minimize costs while satisfying the production constraint. The \(lambda\) is known as the Lagrange multiplier and helps to measure how much the objective function would increase if the constraint were relaxed slightly. Through this method, Podunk can find the balance of workers to guard dogs that achieves its goals in the most cost-efficient manner.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose demand for labor is given by \\[ L=-50 w+450 \\] and supply is given by \\[ L=100 u \\] where \(L\) represents the number of people employed and \(w\) is the real wage rate per hour. a. What will be the equilibrium levels for \(w\) and \(L\) in this market? b. Suppose the government wishes to raise the equilibrium wage to \(\$ 4\) per hour by offering a subsidy to employers for each person hired. How much will this subsidy have to be? What will the new equilibrium level of cmployment be? How much total subsidy will be paid? c. Suppose instead that the government declared a minimum wage of \(\$ 4\) per hour. How much labor would be demanded at this price? How much unemployment would there be? d. Graph your results.

Suppose there are a fixed number of 1,000 identical firms in the perfectly competitive concrete pipe industry. Each firm produces the same fraction of total market output, and each firm's production function for pipe is given by \\[ q=\sqrt{K L} \\] Suppose also that the market demand for concrete pipe is given by \\[ Q=400,000-100,000 P \\] where \(Q\) is total concrete pipe. a. If \(w=v=\$ 1,\) in what ratio will the typical firm use \(K\) and \(L\) ? What will be the long-run average and marginal cost of pipe? b. In long-run equilibrium what will be the market equilibrium price and quantity for concrete pipe? How much will each firm produce? How much labor will be hired by each firm and in the market as a whole? c. Suppose the market wage, \(w\), rose to \(\$ 2\) while \(v\) remained constant at \(\$ 1 .\) How will this change the capital-labor ratio for the typical firm, and how will it affect its marginal costs? d. Under the conditions of part (c), what will the long-run market equilibrium be? How much labor will now be hired by the concrete pipe industry? e. How much of the change in total labor demand from part (b) to part (d) represented the substitution effect resulting from the change in wage and how much represented the output effect?

In the early 1960 s President John Kennedy's Council of Economic Advisers recommended the institution of "Wage-Price Guideposts." The basic idea of the guideposts was to require wages in all industries to increase at the rate at which the national level of output per worker increases (about 3.2 percent per year). Some industries would have had rates of productivity increase of less than 3.2 percent. These industries were to be permitted to increase prices to the extent that their productivity increase fell short of the national average. On the other hand, firms that had productivity increases in excess of the national average were expected to reduce their prices to the extent of this excess. Adherence to these rules was intended to keep prices constant on a nationwide basis. There were numerous exceptions to these general principles, but assume for the purposes of this problem that these were not important. Assuming the Wage-Price Guideposts were legislated as an unbreakable law, answer the following questions: a. What would happen to the relative factor shares in each industry over time? b. What does this implicitly assume about the elasticity of substitution in all industries? c. What effect would this legislation have on the investment of new capital if industries did not obey the assumption discussed in part (b)? d. In regard to your answer to part (c), what effects do you think the guideposts would have on economic growth?

Assume the quantity of envelopes licked per hour by Sticky Gums, Inc., is \(Q=10,000 \sqrt{L}\) where \(L\) is the number of laborers hired per hour by the firm. Assume further that the envelope-licking business is perfectly competitive with a market price of \(\$ .01\) per envelope. a. How much labor would be hired at a competitive wage of \(\$ 10\) ? \(\$ 5\) ? \(\$ 2\) ? Use your results to sketch a demand curve for labor. b. Assume that Sticky Gums hires its labor at an hourly wage of \(\$ 10 .\) What quantity of envelopes will be licked when the price of a licked envelope is \(\$ .10, \$ .05, \$ .02 ?\) Use your results to sketch a supply curve for licked envelopes.

Carl the clothier owns a large garment factory on an isolated island. Carl's factory is the only source of employment for most of the islanders, and thus Carl acts as a monopsonist. The supply curve for garment workers is given by \\[ L=80 w \\] where \(L\) is the number of workers hired and \(w\) is their hourly wage. Assume also that Carl's labor demand (marginal revenue product) curve is given by \\[ L=400-40 M R P_{L} \\] a. How many workers will Carl hire to maximize his profits and what wage will he pay? b. Assume now that the government implements a minimum wage law covering all garment workers. How many workers will Carl now hire and how much unemployment will there be if the minimum wage is set at \(\$ 4\) per hour? c. Graph your results. d. How does a minimum wage imposed under monopsony differ in results as compared with a minimum wage imposed under perfect competition (assuming the minimum wage is above the market-determined wage)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free