Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium for the Battle of the Sexes game described in Example 10.4 may depend on the numerical values of the payoffs. To generalize this solution, assume that the payoff matrix for the game is given by where \(K \geq 1 .\) Show how the Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies for this game depends on the value of \(K\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: In the given Battle of the Sexes game, the Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies is \(p^* = \frac{1}{2}\) for Player 1 (row player) and \(q^* = \frac{1}{K+1}\) for Player 2 (column player). Player 1's equilibrium strategy is independent of the value of \(K\), always choosing both strategies with equal probability. However, Player 2's equilibrium strategy depends on the value of \(K\), with the probability of choosing the first strategy decreasing as \(K\) increases, making them more likely to select the second strategy.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Battle of the Sexes game and its payoff matrix

The Battle of the Sexes game is a two-player game with two possible strategies for each player. The players are often referred to as Player 1 (the row player) and Player 2 (the column player). The payoff matrix \(A\) for the row player, in this case, is given by: $$ A = \begin{pmatrix} K & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} $$ Let \(p\) be the probability of Player 1 choosing the first strategy, and \(1-p\) be the probability of Player 1 choosing the second strategy. Similarly, let \(q\) be the probability of Player 2 choosing the first strategy, and \(1-q\) be the probability of Player 2 choosing the second strategy. Our goal is to find the mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium by finding \(p^*\) and \(q^*\) that satisfy the equilibrium conditions.
02

Calculate the best response functions

In order to find the Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies, we need to find the best response functions for both players. These functions tell us what each player should optimally do, given the other player's strategy. In this case, we need to find Player 1's best response to Player 2's strategy \(q\), denoted by \(BR_1(q)\), and Player 2's best response to Player 1's strategy \(p\), denoted by \(BR_2(p)\). Given Player 2's strategy \(q\), Player 1's expected payoff from playing the first strategy is \(Kq\), and the expected payoff from playing the second strategy is \(1 - q\). The best response function for Player 1, \(BR_1(q)\), is given by: $$ BR_1(q) = \begin{cases} 1, & \text{if } Kq > 1 - q \\ 0, & \text{if } Kq < 1 - q \\ p, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} $$ Similarly, given Player 1's strategy \(p\), Player 2's expected payoff from playing the first strategy is \(p\), and the expected payoff from playing the second strategy is \(1 - p\). The best response function for Player 2, \(BR_2(p)\), is given by: $$ BR_2(p) = \begin{cases} 1, & \text{if } p > 1 - p \\ 0, & \text{if } p < 1 - p \\ q, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} $$
03

Find the Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies

It can be seen from the best response functions for both players that a Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies occurs when neither player has an incentive to change their mixed strategy if the opponent keeps their strategy unchanged. This is true when both best response functions hold simultaneously, i.e., when \(BR_1(q^*) = p^*\) and \(BR_2(p^*) = q^*\). When we look at the best response functions, we can see the Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies occurs when: $$ Kq^* = 1 - q^* \text{ and } p^* = 1 - p^* $$ From these conditions, we can find the equilibrium strategies for both players: $$ q^* = \frac{1}{K+1} \text{ and } p^* = \frac{1}{2} $$
04

Analyze the dependence on \(K\)

From our solution, we can see that the mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium depends on the value of \(K\) as follows: - For Player 1 (row player), their equilibrium probability of playing the first strategy, \(p^*\), is always \(\frac{1}{2}\), independent of the value of \(K\). - For Player 2 (column player), their equilibrium probability of playing the first strategy, \(q^*\), depends on \(K\) through the expression \(\frac{1}{K+1}\). As \(K\) increases, \(q^*\) decreases, making Player 2 more likely to choose the second strategy. In conclusion, the mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium in the Battle of the Sexes game depends on the value of \(K\). Specifically, the row player's equilibrium strategy is always to choose both strategies with equal probability, while the column player's equilibrium strategy depends on the value of \(K\). As \(K\) increases, the column player becomes more likely to choose the second strategy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The game of "chicken" is played by two macho teens who speed toward each other on a single-lane road. The first to veer off is branded the chicken, whereas the one who doesn't turn gains peer group esteem. Of course, if neither veers, both die in the resulting crash. Payoffs to the chicken game are provided in the following table. a. Does this game have a Nash equilibrium? b. Is a threat by either not to chicken-out a credible one? c. Would the ability of one player to firmly commit to a not-chicken strategy (by, for example, throwing away the steering wheel) be desirable for that player?

Players \(A\) and \(B\) have found \(\$ 100\) on the sidewalk and are arguing about how it should be split. A passerby suggests the following game: "Each of you state the number of dollars that you wish \(\left(d_{d}, d_{B}\right) .\) If \(d_{A}+d_{B} \wedge 100\) you can keep the figure you name and I'll take the remainder. If \(d_{A}+d_{B}>100,\) I'll keep the \(\$ 100 . "\) Is there a unique Nash equilibrium in this game of continuous strategies?

Players \(A\) and \(B\) are engaged in a coin-matching game. Each shows a coin as either heads or tails. If the coins match, \(B\) pays A \(\$ 1 .\) If they differ, \(A\) pays \(B \$ 1\) a. Write down the payoff matrix for this game, and show that it does not contain a Nash equilibrium. b. How might the players choose their strategies in this case?

In A Treatise on the Family (Cambridge; Harvard University Press, 1981 ), G. Becker proposes his famous Rotten Kid theorem as a game between a (potentially rotten) child, \(A\), and his or her parent, \(B . A\) moves first and chooses an action, \(r,\) that affects his or her own income \(Y_{A}(r)\) \(\left(Y_{A}^{\prime}>0\right)\) and the income of the parent \(Y_{s}(r)\left(Y_{B}^{\prime}<0\right) .\) In the second stage of the game, the parent leaves a monetary bequest of \(L\) to the child. The child cares only for his or her own utility, \(U_{A}\left(Y_{A}+L\right),\) but the parent maximizes \(U_{B}\left(Y_{B}-L\right)+X U_{A},\) where \(A>0\) reflects the parent's altruism toward the child. Prove that the child will opt for that value of \(r\) that maximizes \(Y_{A}+Y_{B}\) even though he or she has no altruistic intentions. Plint: You must first find the parent's optimal bequest, then solve for the child's optimal strategy, given this subsequent parental behavior.)

Fudenberg and Tirole (1992) develop a game of stag-hunting based on an observation originally made by Rousseau. The two players in the game may either cooperate in catching a stag or each may set out on his own to catch a hare. The payoff matrix for this game is given by a Describe the Nash equilibria in this game. b. Suppose \(B\) believes that \(A\) will use a mixed strategy in choosing how to hunt. How will 5 's optimal strategy choice depend on the probability \(A\) will play stag? c. Suppose this game is expanded to \(n\) players (the game Rousseau had in mind) and that all \(n\) must cooperate in order for a stag to be caught. Assuming that the payoffs for one specific player, say \(B\), remain the same and that all the other \(n-1\) players will opt for mixed strategies, how will \(B\) 's optimal strategy depend on the probabilities with which each of the other players plays stag? Explain why cooperation seems less likely in this larger game.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free