Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Players \(A\) and \(B\) have found \(\$ 100\) on the sidewalk and are arguing about how it should be split. A passerby suggests the following game: "Each of you state the number of dollars that you wish \(\left(d_{d}, d_{B}\right) .\) If \(d_{A}+d_{B} \wedge 100\) you can keep the figure you name and I'll take the remainder. If \(d_{A}+d_{B}>100,\) I'll keep the \(\$ 100 . "\) Is there a unique Nash equilibrium in this game of continuous strategies?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The unique Nash equilibrium of the game is (50, 50), where both players A and B choose to take $50 each.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the concepts and constraints

In this game, players A and B need to choose the amounts \((d_A, d_B)\) such that \(d_A + d_B \leq 100\), otherwise the passerby takes the entire amount. The Nash equilibrium will be a pair of amounts \((d_A^*, d_B^*)\) such that no player can be better off by changing their strategy, given the other player's strategy.
02

Setup players' utility functions

The objective of both players is to maximize their utilities. Let's assume that the utility function of player A is \(U_A(d_A, d_B) = d_A\), and the utility function of player B is \(U_B(d_A, d_B) = d_B\). Both players want to maximize their respective utility functions, given the other player's strategy.
03

Find the Best Response Functions

To find the Nash equilibrium, we need to find the best response functions (BRF) for both players. The BRFs are the amounts that each player will choose to maximize their utility, given the other player's amount. For player A, the BRF is given by the following equation: \(BRF_A(d_B) = \max_{d_A} U_A(d_A, d_B) = \max_{d_A} d_A\) Subject to the constraint: \(d_A + d_B \leq 100\) Similarly, for player B, the BRF is given by the following equation: \(BRF_B(d_A) = \max_{d_B} U_B(d_A, d_B) = \max_{d_B} d_B\) Subject to the constraint: \(d_A + d_B \leq 100\)
04

Solve for the Nash equilibrium

The Nash equilibrium can be found by solving the BRFs for both players: \((d_A^*, d_B^*) = (BRF_A(d_B^*), BRF_B(d_A^*))\) Using the constraint \(d_A + d_B \leq 100\), we can rewrite the BRFs as follows: \(BRF_A(d_B^*) = 100 - d_B^*\) \(BRF_B(d_A^*) = 100 - d_A^*\) Now, substituting the BRFs for equilibrium amounts \((d_A^*, d_B^*)\), we get: \((d_A^*, d_B^*) = (100 - d_B^*, 100 - d_A^*)\) Since the game is symmetric, i.e., both players face the same constraints and have the same objective, the Nash equilibrium will have both players choosing the same amounts: \(d_A^* = d_B^* = \frac{100}{2} = 50\) Thus, the unique Nash equilibrium of the game is \((d_A^*, d_B^*) = (50, 50)\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Smith and Jones are playing a number-matching game. Each chooses either \(1,2,\) or \(3 .\) If the numbers match, Jones pays Smith \(\$ 3 .\) If they differ, Smith pays Jones \(\$ 1\) a Describe the payoff matrix for this game and show that it does not possess a Nash equi librium strategy pair. b. Show that with mixed strategies this game does have a Nash equilibrium if each player plays each number with probability Vs. What is the value of this game?

Players \(A\) and \(B\) are engaged in a coin-matching game. Each shows a coin as either heads or tails. If the coins match, \(B\) pays A \(\$ 1 .\) If they differ, \(A\) pays \(B \$ 1\) a. Write down the payoff matrix for this game, and show that it does not contain a Nash equilibrium. b. How might the players choose their strategies in this case?

The game of "chicken" is played by two macho teens who speed toward each other on a single-lane road. The first to veer off is branded the chicken, whereas the one who doesn't turn gains peer group esteem. Of course, if neither veers, both die in the resulting crash. Payoffs to the chicken game are provided in the following table. a. Does this game have a Nash equilibrium? b. Is a threat by either not to chicken-out a credible one? c. Would the ability of one player to firmly commit to a not-chicken strategy (by, for example, throwing away the steering wheel) be desirable for that player?

Consider the following sealed-bid auction for a rare baseball card. Player \(A\) values the card being auctioned at \(\$ 600,\) player lvalues the card at \(\$ 500,\) and these valuations are known to each player who will submit a sealed bid for the card. Whoever bids the most will win the card. If equal bids are submitted, the auctioneer will flip a coin to decide the winner. Each player must now decide how much to bid. a. How would you categorize the strategies in this game? Do some strategies dominate others? b. Does this game have a Nash equilibrium? Is it unique? c. How would this game change if each player did not know the other's valuation for the card?

The mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium for the Battle of the Sexes game described in Example 10.4 may depend on the numerical values of the payoffs. To generalize this solution, assume that the payoff matrix for the game is given by where \(K \geq 1 .\) Show how the Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies for this game depends on the value of \(K\)

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free