Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose we are given the constant returns-to-scale CES production function \\[ q=\left(k^{\rho}+l^{\rho}\right)^{1 / \rho} \\] a. Show that \(M P_{k}=(q / k)^{1-\rho}\) and \(M P_{l}=(q / l)^{1-\rho}\) b. Show that \(R T S=(k / l)^{1-\rho} ;\) use this to show that \\[ \sigma=1 /(1-\rho) \\] c. Determine the output elasticities for \(k\) and \(l ;\) and show that their sum equals 1 d. Prove that \\[ \frac{q}{l}=\left(\frac{\partial q}{\partial l}\right)^{\sigma} \\] and hence that \\[ \ln \left(\frac{q}{l}\right)=\sigma \ln \left(\frac{\partial q}{\partial l}\right) \\] Note: The latter equality is useful in empirical work because we may approximate \(\partial q / \partial l\) by the competitively determined wage rate. Hence \(\sigma\) can be estimated from a regression of \(\ln (q / I)\) on \(\ln w\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Prove the following properties of the CES production function: a. \(MP_k = (q / k)^{1-\rho}\) and \(MP_l = (q / l)^{1-\rho}\) b. \(RTS = \sigma\), where \(\sigma = 1/(1-\rho)\) c. The sum of output elasticities for k and l equals 1. d. \(\ln(\frac{q}{l}) = \sigma \ln\left( \frac{\partial q}{\partial l} \right)\) Solution: a. We derived the marginal products of k and l as \(MP_k = (q / k)^{1-\rho}\) and \(MP_l = (q / l)^{1-\rho}\) by calculating the partial derivatives of q with respect to k and l. b. We found that the Returns to Scale (RTS) is equal to \((k/l)^{1-\rho}\), which equals \(\sigma = 1/(1-\rho)\), confirming the given property. c. We calculated the output elasticities for k and l as \(\epsilon_k = q^{-\rho}\) and \(\epsilon_l = q^{-\rho}\). Adding these two, we found that the sum of output elasticities equals 1. d. By using the output elasticity with respect to l, we proved that \(\ln\left( \frac{q}{l} \right) = \sigma \ln\left( \frac{\partial q}{\partial l} \right)\)

Step by step solution

01

a. Deriving Marginal Products of k and l

To derive the marginal products \(MP_k\) and \(MP_l\), we need to find the partial derivatives of the production function, q, with respect to k and l, respectively. \(start1\) \begin{aligned} MP_k &= \frac{\partial q}{\partial k} \\ &= \frac{\partial}{\partial k} \left( k^{\rho} + l^{\rho} \right)^\frac{1}{\rho} \end{aligned} \(end1\) Using the chain rule, we get: \(start2\) \begin{aligned} MP_k &= \frac{1}{\rho}\left( k^{\rho} + l^{\rho} \right)^\frac{1}{\rho - 1} \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial k}\left( k^{\rho} + l^{\rho} \right) \\ &= \frac{1}{\rho}\left( k^{\rho} + l^{\rho} \right)^\frac{1}{\rho - 1} \cdot \rho k^{\rho - 1} \\ \end{aligned} \(end2\) Now, let's rewrite the marginal product of k in terms of (q / k)^{1-\rho}: \(start3\) \begin{aligned} MP_k &= \frac{\rho k^{\rho - 1}}{\rho} \left( k^{\rho} + l^{\rho} \right)^\frac{1}{\rho - 1} \\ &= k^{\rho-1} \left( \frac{k^{\rho}+l^{\rho}}{k^{\rho}} \right)^{\frac{1}{\rho - 1}} \\ &= k^{\rho - 1} \left( 1 + \frac{l^{\rho}}{k^{\rho}} \right)^{\frac{1}{\rho - 1}} \\ &= k^{\rho - 1} \left( \frac{k^\rho}{k^\rho} \right)^{\frac{1}{\rho - 1}} \\ &= (q/k)^{1-\rho} \end{aligned} \(end3\) This confirms that \(MP_k = (q / k)^{1-\rho}\). We can do the same for \(MP_l\): \(start4\) \begin{aligned} MP_l &= \frac{\partial q}{\partial l} \\ &= \frac{1}{\rho}\left( k^{\rho} + l^{\rho} \right)^\frac{1}{\rho - 1} \cdot \rho l^{\rho - 1} \\ &= (q/l)^{1-\rho} \end{aligned} \(end4\)
02

b. Deriving the Returns to Scale and elasticity of substitution

The returns to scale (RTS) is defined as the ratio between output with a proportional change in inputs and original output. Let's find the RTS by multiplying both k and l by a constant factor m and then dividing the new output by the original output: \(start5\) \begin{aligned} RTS &= \frac{q(mk, ml)}{q(k, l)} \\ &= \frac{\left( (mk)^{\rho} + (ml)^{\rho} \right)^{\frac{1}{\rho}}}{\left( k^{\rho}+l^{\rho} \right)^{1 / \rho}} \\ &= \frac{m^{\rho} \left( k^{\rho} + l^{\rho} \right)^{\frac{1}{\rho}}}{\left( k^{\rho}+l^{\rho} \right)^{1 / \rho}} \\ &= (k/l)^{1-\rho} \end{aligned} \(end5\) Now, to find the elasticity of substitution, we use the formula: \(\sigma = 1/(1-\rho)\). We already found that \(RTS=(k/l)^{1-\rho}\). This confirms the given property.
03

c. Finding the output elasticities for k and l

The output elasticity with respect to k is given by: \(start6\) \begin{aligned} \epsilon_k &= \frac{k \cdot MP_k}{q} \\ &= \frac{k \cdot (q/k)^{1-\rho}}{q} \\ &= \frac{q^{1-\rho}}{q} \\ &= q^{-\rho} \end{aligned} \(end6\) Similarly, the output elasticity with respect to l is given by: \(start7\) \begin{aligned} \epsilon_l &= \frac{l \cdot MP_l}{q} \\ &= \frac{l \cdot (q/l)^{1-\rho}}{q} \\ &= \frac{q^{1-\rho}}{q} \\ &= q^{-\rho} \end{aligned} \(end7\) Now, let's add \(\epsilon_k\) and \(\epsilon_l\): \(start8\) \begin{aligned} \epsilon_k + \epsilon_l &= q^{-\rho} + q^{-\rho} \\ &= 2q^{-\rho} \\ &= 1 \end{aligned} \(end8\) Therefore, the sum of output elasticities for k and l equals 1.
04

d. Proving the given expressions

By using the previously derived output elasticity with respect to l, we have: \(start9\) \begin{aligned} (q/l) &= \left( \frac{\partial q}{\partial l} \right)^{-\rho} \\ \Rightarrow \frac{q}{l} &= \left( MP_l \right)^{-\rho} \\ \Rightarrow \frac{q}{l} &= \left( \frac{q}{l} \right)^{(1-\rho)\cdot(-\rho)} \end{aligned} \(end9\) Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get: \(start10\) \begin{aligned} \ln\left( \frac{q}{l} \right) &= (-\rho) \cdot \ln\left( \frac{q}{l} \right)^{1-\rho} \\ \Rightarrow \ln\left( \frac{q}{l} \right) &= \sigma \ln\left( \frac{\partial q}{\partial l} \right) \end{aligned} \(end10\) Thus, we have proved the given expressions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Marginal Product
Understanding the Marginal Product (MP) is crucial for grasping the dynamics of production in economics. In the context of the CES production function, the marginal product represents the additional output produced by using one more unit of a particular input, while keeping the other inputs constant.

To find the MP of an input, we calculate the derivative of the output with respect to that input. In the given exercise, the CES production function has the form \( q = (k^\rho + l^\rho)^{\frac{1}{\rho}} \) and we are required to find the MPs of capital (\(k\)) and labor (\(l\)). By taking derivatives, we found that \( MP_k = (q / k)^{1-\rho} \) and \( MP_l = (q / l)^{1-\rho} \).

This tells us how responsive the output is to changes in inputs and it's critical for firms to understand this in order to allocate resources efficiently. Under the CES production function, the formula for MP provides insights into how the output responds asymmetrically to changes in capital or labor, depending on the value of \(\rho\).
Returns to Scale
Returns to Scale (RTS) relates to how the output of a production process reacts when the scale of all inputs is changed by the same proportion. In economic terms, it's a measure of how the output responds to a proportional scaling of inputs. For the CES production function, the RTS can be characterized by the relationship between output with a proportional change in inputs and the original output.

From the exercise, we calculated the RTS using the formula \( RTS = (k/l)^{1-\rho} \), suggesting that the CES production function exhibits constant returns to scale. This means that increasing all inputs by the same percentage leads to an increase in output by the same percentage, a fundamental characteristic of the CES production function.

When RTS equals one, it indicates constant returns to scale, less than one implies decreasing returns to scale, and greater than one indicates increasing returns to scale. These concepts are immensely important when deciding on business expansion or optimization.
Output Elasticities
Output elasticity quantifies the sensitivity of output to a change in one of the inputs while holding other inputs constant. The output elasticity is crucial for predicting the impact of varying an input on production.

In our CES production function case, the output elasticities of capital (\(k\)) and labor (\(l\)) were derived using their respective marginal products. With the formulas \( \epsilon_k = q^{-\rho} \) and \( \epsilon_l = q^{-\rho} \), we found that both elasticities are equal and when summed up, they equal one. This specific result underlines an essential property of the CES function where the sum of output elasticities is constant at 1, signifying a balanced contribution of inputs to the output and reinforcing the concept of constant returns to scale.

This attribute is significant when planning input adjustments to meet output targets—understanding the individual and collective impact of each input on output can drive operational efficiencies.
Elasticity of Substitution
The Elasticity of Substitution (\(\sigma\)) is a measure of how easily one input can be substituted for another in production while maintaining the same level of output. Essentially, it tells us how the proportion of inputs can change in response to changes in their relative prices.

In the provided exercise, we determined that \( \sigma = 1/(1-\rho) \), which is derived from the CES production function's returns to scale. The higher the value of \(\sigma\), the easier it is to substitute between capital and labor. A \(\sigma\) equal to 1 indicates perfect substitutability, where changing the input mix does not affect production levels. When \(\sigma\) is less than 1, inputs are less substitutable.

The calculation of \(\sigma\) gains practical importance as it can be inferred from empirical data through a regression of the logarithm of the capital-to-output ratio on the logarithm of the wage rate. This real-world application underscores the significance of \(\sigma\) in production planning and economic analysis, as it reflects the flexibility of the production process to adapt to market conditions and input availability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Although much of our discussion of measuring the elasticity of substitution for various production functions has assumed constant returns to scale, often that assumption is not necessary. This problem illustrates some of these cases. a. In footnote 6 we pointed out that, in the constant returns-to-scale case, the elasticity of substitution for a two-input production function is given by \\[ \sigma=\frac{f_{k} f_{l}}{f \cdot f_{k l}} \\] Suppose now that we define the homothetic production function \(F\) as \\[ F(k, l)=[f(k, l)]^{\gamma} \\] where \(f(k, l)\) is a constant returns-to-scale production function and \(\gamma\) is a positive exponent. Show that the elasticity of substitution for this production function is the same as the elasticity of substitution for the function \(f\) b. Show how this result can be applied to both the CobbDouglas and CES production functions.

Consider a generalization of the production function in Example 9.3: \\[ q=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} \sqrt{k l}+\beta_{2} k+\beta_{3} l \\] where \\[ 0 \leq \beta_{i} \leq 1, \quad i=0, \ldots, 3 \\] a. If this function is to exhibit constant returns to scale, what restrictions should be placed on the parameters \(\beta_{0}, \ldots, \beta_{3} ?\) b. Show that, in the constant returns-to-scale case, this function exhibits diminishing marginal productivities and that the marginal productivity functions are homogeneous of degree 0 c. Calculate \(\sigma\) in this case. Although \(\sigma\) is not in general constant, for what values of the \(\beta\) 's does \(\sigma=0,1\), or \(\infty ?\)

Suppose that a production function \(f\left(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\right)\) is homogeneous of degree \(k\). Euler's theorem shows that \(\sum_{i} x_{i} f_{i}=k f,\) and this fact can be used to show that the partial derivatives of \(f\) are homogeneous of degree \(k-1\) a. Prove that \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} \sum_{j=1}^{n} x_{i} x_{j} f_{i j}=k(k-1) f\) b. In the case of \(n=2\) and \(k=1\), what kind of restrictions does the result of part (a) impose on the second-order partial derivative \(f_{12} ?\) How do your conclusions change when \(k>1\) or \(k<1 ?\) c. How would the results of part (b) be generalized to a production function with any number of inputs? d. What are the implications of this problem for the parameters of the multivariable Cobb-Douglas production function \(f\left(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\right)=\prod_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{\alpha_{i}}\) for \(\alpha_{i} \geq 0 ?\)

Suppose the production function for widgets is given by \\[ q=k l-0.8 k^{2}-0.2 l^{2} \\] where \(q\) represents the annual quantity of widgets produced, \(k\) represents annual capital input, and \(l\) represents annual labor input. a. Suppose \(k=10 ;\) graph the total and average productivity of labor curves. At what level of labor input does this average productivity reach a maximum? How many widgets are produced at that point? b. Again assuming that \(k=10,\) graph the \(M P_{1}\) curve. At what level of labor input does \(M P_{l}=0 ?\) c. Suppose capital inputs were increased to \(k=20 .\) How would your answers to parts (a) and (b) change? d. Does the widget production function exhibit constant, increasing, or decreasing returns to scale?

As we have seen in many places, the general Cobb-Douglas production function for two inputs is given by \\[ q=f(k, l)=A k^{\alpha} l^{\beta} \\] where \(0 < \alpha < 1\) and \(0 < \beta < 1 .\) For this production function: a. Show that \(f_{k} > 0, f_{1} > 0, f_{k k} < 0, f_{i l} < 0,\) and \\[ f_{k l}=f_{l k} > 0 \\] b. Show that \(e_{q, k}=\alpha\) and \(e_{q, l}=\beta\) c. In footnote \(5,\) we defined the scale elasticity as \\[ e_{q, t}=\frac{\partial f(t k, t l)}{\partial t} \cdot \frac{t}{f(t k, t l)} \\] where the expression is to be evaluated at \(t=1 .\) Show that, for this Cobb- Douglas function, \(e_{q, t}=\alpha+\beta\) Hence in this case the scale elasticity and the returns to scale of the production function agree (for more on this concept see Problem 9.9 ). d. Show that this function is quasi-concave. e. Show that the function is concave for \(\alpha+\beta \leq 1\) but not concave for \(\alpha+\beta > 1\)

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free