Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In the Extensions to Chapter 4 we showed that most empirical work in demand theory focuses on income shares. For any good \(x,\) the income share is defined as \(s_{x}=p_{x} x / I .\) In this problem we show that most demand elasticities can be derived from corresponding share elasticities. a. Show that the elasticity of a good's budget share with respect to income \(\left(e_{s_{n} I}=\partial s_{x} / \partial I \cdot I / s_{x}\right)\) is equal to \(e_{x, l}-1 .\) Interpret this conclusion with a few numerical examples. b. Show that the elasticity of a good's budget share with respect to its own price \(\left(e_{s_{s} p_{x}}=\partial s_{x} / \partial p_{x} \cdot p_{x} / s_{x}\right)\) is equal to \(e_{x, p_{x}}+1 .\) Again, interpret this finding with a few numerical examples. c. Use your results from part (b) to show that the "expenditure elasticity" of good \(x\) with respect to its own price \(\left[e_{p_{x} \cdot x, p_{x}}=\partial\left(p_{x} \cdot x\right) / \partial p_{x} \cdot 1 / x\right]\) is also equal to \(e_{x, p_{x}}+1\) d. Show that the elasticity of a good's budget share with respect to a change in the price of some other good \(\left(e_{s_{s} p_{y}}=\partial s_{x} / \partial p_{y} \cdot p_{y} / s_{x}\right)\) is equal to \(e_{x, p}\) e. In the Extensions to Chapter 4 we showed that with a CES utility function, the share of income devoted to good \(x\) is given by \(s_{x}=1 /\left(1+p_{y}^{k} p_{x}^{-k}\right),\) where \(k=\delta /(\delta-1)=\) \(1-\sigma .\) Use this share equation to prove Equation 5.56 \(e_{x^{\prime}, p_{x}}=-\left(1-s_{x}\right) \sigma\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
#c. Elasticity of a good's budget share with respect to the price of another good# Given: - Budget share: \(s_x = \frac{p_x x}{I}\) - Cross-price elasticity of the budget share: \(e_{s_{p_y}} = \frac{\partial s_x}{\partial p_y} \cdot \frac{p_y}{s_x}\) #tag_title#Step 1: Calculate the derivative of the budget share with respect to the price of another good#tag_content#To find the cross-price elasticity of the budget share, we need to differentiate the budget share with respect to the price of another good. $$ \frac{\partial s_x}{\partial p_y} = \frac{\partial}{\partial p_y} \left( \frac{p_x x}{I} \right) = 0 $$ The derivative is zero because the budget share of good x does not depend on the price of another good, which is unrelated. #tag_title#Step 2: Calculate the cross-price elasticity of the budget share \(e_{s_{p_y}}\)#tag_content#Now that we have the derivative, we can calculate the cross-price elasticity of the budget share. $$ e_{s_{p_y}} = \frac{0}{\frac{p_x x}{I}} \cdot p_y = 0 $$ The cross-price elasticity of the budget share is zero because we have assumed that the goods are unrelated. Therefore, the budget share of good x does not depend on the price of another unrelated good. #tag_title#Step 3: Find the relationship between \(e_{s_{p_y}}\) and \(e_{x,p_y}\)#tag_content#We want to show that \(e_{s_{p_y}} = e_{x,p_y}\). Since \(e_{s_{p_y}} = 0\), we can write: $$ e_{x,p_y} = 0 $$ This relationship indicates that the budget share of good x is not affected by changes in the price of an unrelated good, meaning that the demand for good x is not influenced by the price of the unrelated good.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the derivative of the budget share with respect to income

To find the income elasticity of the budget share, we need to differentiate the budget share with respect to income. $$ \frac{\partial s_x}{\partial I} = \frac{\partial}{\partial I} \left( \frac{p_x x}{I} \right) = -\frac{p_x x}{I^2} $$
02

Calculate the income elasticity of the budget share \(e_{s_I}\)

Now that we have the derivative, we can calculate the income elasticity of the budget share. $$ e_{s_I} = \frac{-\frac{p_x x}{I^2}}{\frac{p_x x}{I}} \cdot I = - \frac{1}{I} $$
03

Find the relationship between \(e_{s_I}\) and \(e_{x,I}\)

We want to show that \(e_{s_I} = e_{x,I} - 1\). Since \(e_{s_I} = -\frac{1}{I}\), we can write: $$ e_{x,I} - 1 = -\frac{1}{I} \Rightarrow e_{x,I} = 1 - \frac{1}{I} $$ This relationship shows that the income elasticity of the budget share is equal to the income elasticity of demand minus one. As income increases, the income elasticity of the budget share decreases. #b. Elasticity of a good's budget share with respect to its own price# Given: - Budget share: \(s_x = \frac{p_x x}{I}\) - Price elasticity of the budget share: \(e_{s_{p_x}} = \frac{\partial s_x}{\partial p_x} \cdot \frac{p_x}{s_x}\)
04

Calculate the derivative of the budget share with respect to its own price

To find the price elasticity of the budget share, we need to differentiate the budget share with respect to its own price. $$ \frac{\partial s_x}{\partial p_x} = \frac{\partial}{\partial p_x} \left( \frac{p_x x}{I} \right) = \frac{x}{I} $$
05

Calculate the price elasticity of the budget share \(e_{s_{p_x}}\)

Now that we have the derivative, we can calculate the price elasticity of the budget share. $$ e_{s_{p_x}} = \frac{\frac{x}{I}}{\frac{p_x x}{I}} \cdot p_x = 1 $$
06

Find the relationship between \(e_{s_{p_x}}\) and \(e_{x,p_x}\)

We want to show that \(e_{s_{p_x}} = e_{x,p_x} + 1\). Since \(e_{s_{p_x}} = 1\), we can write: $$ e_{x,p_x} + 1 = 1 \Rightarrow e_{x,p_x} = 0 $$ This relationship shows that the price elasticity of a good's budget share is equal to the price elasticity of demand plus one. The budget share remains constant as the price of the good changes. #Continuing in the next answer due to character limitations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Price indifference curves are iso-utility curves with the prices of two goods on the \(X\) - and \(Y\) -axes, respectively. Thus, they have the following general form: \(\left(p_{1}, p_{2}\right) | v\left(p_{1}, p_{2}, I\right)=v_{0}\) a. Derive the formula for the price indifference curves for the Cobb-Douglas case with \(\alpha=\beta=0.5 .\) Sketch one of them. b. What does the slope of the curve show? c. What is the direction of increasing utility in your graph?

Show that the share of income spent on a good \(x\) is \(s_{x}=\frac{d \ln E}{d \ln p_{x}},\) where \(E\) is total expenditure

Many of the topics in behavioral economics can be approached using a simple model that pictures economic decision makers as having multiple "selves," each with a different utility function. Here we examine two versions of this model. In each we assume that this person's choices are dictated by one of two possible quasi-linear utility functions: (1) \(U_{1}(x, y)=x+2 \ln y\) \((2) U_{2}(x, y)=x+3 \ln y\) a. Decision utility: In this model we make a distinction between the utility function that the person uses to make decisions-function \((1)-\) and the function that determines the utility he or she actually experiencesfunction \((2) .\) These functions may differ for a variety of reasons such as lack of information about good \(y\) or \((\) in a two period setting an unwillingness to change from past behavior. Whatever the cause, the divergence between the two concepts can lead to welfare losses. To see this, assume that \(p_{x}=p_{y}=1\) and \(I=10\) i. What consumption choices will this person make using his or her decision utility function? ii. What will be the loss of experienced utility if this person makes the choice specified in part i? iii. How much of a subsidy would have to be given to good \(y\) purchases if this person is to be encouraged to consume commodity bundle that actually maximizes experienced utility (remember, this person still maximizes decision utility in his or her decision making? iv. We know from the lump sum principle that an income transfer could achieve the utility level specified in part iii at a cost lower than subsidizing good \(y .\) Show this and then discuss whether this might not be a socially preferred solution to the problem. b. Preference uncertainty: In this version of the multi-self model, the individual recognizes that he or she might experience either of the two utility functions in the future but does not know which will prevail. One possible solution to this problem is to assume either is equally likely, so make consumption choices that maximize \(U(x, y)=x+2.5 \ln y\) i. What commodity bundle will this person choose? ii. Given the choice in part i what utility losses will be experienced once this person discovers his or her "true" preferences? iii. How much would this person pay to gather information about his or her future preferences before making the consumption choices?

Suppose that a person regards ham and cheese as pure complements-he or she will always use one slice of ham in combination with one slice of cheese to make a ham and cheese sandwich. Suppose also that ham and cheese are the only goods that this person buys and that bread is free. a. If the price of ham is equal to the price of cheese, show that the own- price elasticity of demand for ham is -0.5 and that the cross-price elasticity of demand for ham with respect to the price of cheese is also -0.5 b. Explain why the results from part (a) reflect only income effects, not substitution effects. What are the compensated price elasticities in this problem? c. Use the results from part (b) to show how your answers to part (a) would change if a slice of ham cost twice the price of a slice of cheese. d. Explain how this problem could be solved intuitively by assuming this person consumes only one good-a ham and cheese sandwich.

Over a 3 -year period, an individual exhibits the following consumption behavior: $$\begin{array}{lcccc} & p_{x} & p_{y} & x & y \\ \hline \text {Year 1} & 3 & 3 & 7 & 4 \\ \text {Year 2} & 4 & 2 & 6 & 6 \\ \text {Year 3} & 5 & 1 & 7 & 3 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ Is this behavior consistent with the principles of revealed preference theory?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free