Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the following utility functions: a. \(U(x, y)=x y\) b. \(U(x, y)=x^{2} y^{2}\) c. \(U(x, y)=\ln x+\ln y\) Show that each of these has a diminishing \(M R S\) but that they exhibit constant, increasing, and decreasing marginal utility, respectively. What do you conclude?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: All three utility functions have a diminishing MRS. However, they exhibit different types of marginal utility - constant for the first function, increasing for the second function, and decreasing for the third function.

Step by step solution

01

Utility Function 1 - \(U(x, y)=x y\)

Find the partial derivatives: $$\frac{\partial U}{\partial x} = y$$ $$\frac{\partial U}{\partial y} = x$$ Compute the MRS: $$MRS = \frac{\frac{\partial U}{\partial x}}{\frac{\partial U}{\partial y}} = \frac{y}{x}$$ The MRS decreases as the value of x increases, which shows that it has a diminishing MRS. The second-order partial derivatives are constant in this case, so the marginal utility is constant.
02

Utility Function 2 - \(U(x, y)=x^{2} y^{2}\)

Find the partial derivatives: $$\frac{\partial U}{\partial x} = 2xy^{2}$$ $$\frac{\partial U}{\partial y} = 2x^{2}y$$ Compute the MRS: $$MRS = \frac{\frac{\partial U}{\partial x}}{\frac{\partial U}{\partial y}} = \frac{2xy^{2}}{2x^{2}y} = \frac{y}{x}$$ The MRS decreases as the value of x increases, which shows that it has a diminishing MRS. The second-order partial derivatives become larger as the values of x and y increase, so the marginal utility is increasing.
03

Utility Function 3 - \(U(x, y)=\ln x+\ln y\)

Find the partial derivatives: $$\frac{\partial U}{\partial x} = \frac{1}{x}$$ $$\frac{\partial U}{\partial y} = \frac{1}{y}$$ Compute the MRS: $$MRS = \frac{\frac{\partial U}{\partial x}}{\frac{\partial U}{\partial y}} = \frac{\frac{1}{x}}{\frac{1}{y}} = \frac{y}{x}$$ The MRS decreases as the value of x increases, which shows that it has a diminishing MRS. The second-order partial derivatives become smaller as the values of x and y increase, so the marginal utility is decreasing. From the analysis above, we can conclude that all three utility functions have a diminishing MRS, but they exhibit different types of marginal utility - constant, increasing, and decreasing, respectively.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a 1992 article David G. Luenberger introduced what he termed the benefit function as a way of incorporating some degree of cardinal measurement into utility theory. \(^{10}\) The author asks us to specify a certain elementary consumption bundle and then measure how many replications of this bundle would need to be provided to an individual to raise his or her utility level to a particular target. Suppose there are only two goods and that the utility target is given by \(U^{*}(x, y) .\) Suppose also that the elementary consumption bundle is given by \(\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right) .\) Then the value of the benefit function, \(b\left(U^{*}\right),\) is that value of \(\alpha\) for which \(U\left(\alpha x_{0}, \alpha y_{0}\right)=U^{*}\) a. Suppose utility is given by \(U(x, y)=x^{\beta} y^{1-\beta}\). Calculate the benefit function for \(x_{0}=y_{0}=1\) b. Using the utility function from part (a), calculate the benefit function for \(x_{0}=1, y_{0}=0 .\) Explain why your results differ from those in part (a). c. The benefit function can also be defined when an individual has initial endowments of the two goods. If these initial endowments are given by \(\bar{x}, \bar{y},\) then \(b\left(U^{*}, \bar{x}, \bar{y}\right)\) is given by that value of \(a\), which satisfies the equation \(U\left(\bar{x}+\alpha x_{0}, \bar{y}+\alpha y_{0}\right)=U^{*} .\) In this situation the "bene- fit" can be either positive (when \(U(\bar{x}, \bar{y})U^{*}\) ). Develop a graphical description of these two possibilities, and explain how the nature of the elementary bundle may affect the benefit calculation. d. Consider two possible initial endowments, \(\bar{x}_{1}, \bar{y}_{1}\) and \(\bar{x}_{2}, \bar{y}_{2} .\) Explain both graphically and intuitively why \(b\left(U^{*}, \frac{\bar{x}_{1}+\bar{x}_{2}}{2}, \frac{\bar{y}_{1}+\bar{y}_{2}}{2}\right)<0.5 b\left(U^{*}, \bar{x}_{1}, \bar{y}_{1}\right)+\) \(0.5 b\left(U^{*}, \bar{x}_{2}, \bar{y}_{2}\right) .\) (Note: This shows that the benefit function is concave in the initial endowments.)

The formal study of preferences uses a general vector notation. A bundle of \(n\) commodities is denoted by the vector \(\mathbf{x}=\left(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\right),\) and a preference relation \((>)\) is defined over all potential bundles. The statement \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}\) means that bundle \(\mathbf{x}^{1}\) is preferred to bundle \(\mathbf{x}^{2}\). Indifference between two such bundles is denoted by \(\mathbf{x}^{1}=\mathbf{x}^{2}\) The preference relation is "complete" if for any two bundles the individual is able to state either \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}, \mathbf{x}^{2}>\mathbf{x}^{1},\) or \(\mathbf{x}^{1}=\mathbf{x}^{2} .\) The relation is "transitive" if \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}\) and \(\mathbf{x}^{2}>\mathbf{x}^{3}\) implies that \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{3}\). Finally, a preference relation is "continuous" if for any bundle \(y\) such that \(y>x,\) any bundle suitably close to y will also be preferred to \(\mathbf{x}\). Using these definitions, discuss whether each of the following preference relations is complete, transitive, and continuous. a. Summation preferences: This preference relation assumes one can indeed add apples and oranges. Specifically, $$\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2} \text { if and only if } \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{1}>\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{2} \text { . If } \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{1}=\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{2} \\ \mathbf{x}^{1} \approx \mathbf{x}^{2} \end{array}$$ b. Lexicographic preferences: In this case the preference relation is organized as a dictionary: If \(x_{1}^{1}>x_{1}^{2}, \mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}\) (regardless of the amounts of the other \(n-1\) goods). If \(x_{1}^{1}=x_{1}^{2}\) and \(x_{2}^{1}>x_{2}^{2}, \mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{2}\) (regardless of the amounts of the other \(n-2 \text { goods }) .\) The lexicographic preference relation then continues in this way throughout the entire list of goods. c. Preferences with satiation: For this preference relation there is assumed to be a consumption bundle ( \(\mathbf{x}^{*}\) ) that provides complete "bliss." The ranking of all other bundles is determined by how close they are to \(\mathbf{x}^{*}\). That is, \(\mathbf{x}^{1}>\mathbf{x}^{\mathbf{2}}\) if and only if \(\left|\mathbf{x}^{1}-\mathbf{x}^{*}\right|<\left|\mathbf{x}^{2}-\mathbf{x}^{*}\right|\) where \(\left|\mathbf{x}^{1}-\mathbf{x}^{*}\right|=\) \(\sqrt{\left(x_{1}^{i}-x_{1}^{*}\right)^{2}+\left(x_{2}^{i}-x_{2}^{*}\right)^{2}+\cdots+\left(x_{n}^{i}-x_{n}^{*}\right)^{2}}\)

a. \(A\) consumer is willing to trade 3 units of \(x\) for 1 unit of \(y\) when she has 6 units of \(x\) and 5 units of \(y .\) She is also willing to trade in 6 units of \(x\) for 2 units of \(y\) when she has 12 units of \(x\) and 3 units of \(y .\) She is indifferent between bundle (6,5) and bundle \((12,3) .\) What is the utility function for goods \(x\) and \(y ?\) Hint: What is the shape of the indifference curve? b. A consumer is willing to trade 4 units of \(x\) for 1 unit of \(y\) when she is consuming bundle \((8,1) .\) She is also willing to trade in 1 unit of \(x\) for 2 units of \(y\) when she is consuming bundle \((4,4) .\) She is indifferent between these two bundles. Assuming that the utility function is Cobb-Douglas of the form \(U(x, y)=x^{\alpha} y^{\beta},\) where \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are positive constants, what is the utility function for this consumer? c. Was there a redundancy of information in part (b)? If yes, how much is the minimum amount of information required in that question to derive the utility function?

Example 3.3 shows that the \(M R S\) for the Cobb-Douglas function \\[ U(x, y)=x^{\alpha} y^{\beta} \\] is given by \\[ M R S=\frac{\alpha}{\beta}\left(\frac{y}{x}\right) \\] a. Does this result depend on whether \(\alpha+\beta=1 ?\) Does this sum have any relevance to the theory of choice? b. For commodity bundles for which \(y=x\), how does the \(M R S\) depend on the values of \(\alpha\) and \(\beta ?\) Develop an intuitive explanation of why, if \(\alpha>\beta, M R S>1\) Illustrate your argument with a graph. c. Suppose an individual obtains utility only from amounts of \(x\) and \(y\) that exceed minimal subsistence levels given by \(x_{0}, y_{0} .\) In this case, \\[ U(x, y)=\left(x-x_{0}\right)^{\alpha}\left(y-y_{0}\right)^{\beta} \\] Is this function homothetic? (For a further discussion, see the Extensions to Chapter \(4 .\) )

As we saw in Figure \(3.5,\) one way to show convexity of indifference curves is to show that for any two points \(\left(x_{1}, y_{1}\right)\) and \(\left(x_{2}, y_{2}\right)\) on an indifference curve that promises \(U=k\), the utility associated with the point \(\left(\frac{x_{1}+x_{2}}{2}, \frac{y_{1}+y_{2}}{2}\right)\) is at least as great as \(k .\) Use this approach to discuss the convexity of the indifference curves for the following three functions. Be sure to graph your results. a. \(U(x, y)=\min (x, y)\) b. \(U(x, y)=\max (x, y)\) c. \(U(x, y)=x+y\)

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free