Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Two goods have independent marginal utilities if \\[ \frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial y \partial x}=\frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial x \partial y}=0 \\] Show that if we assume diminishing marginal utility for each good, then any utility function with independent marginal utilities will have a diminishing \(M R S\). Provide an example to show that the converse of this statement is not true.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Prove that if we assume diminishing marginal utility for each good, any utility function with independent marginal utilities will have a diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS). Answer: Using the diminishing marginal utility assumption and the independent marginal utilities condition, we compute the second-order derivative of MRS concerning x: \(\frac{\partial MRS_{xy}}{\partial x}\). We found that \(\frac{\partial MRS_{xy}}{\partial x} < 0\), which shows that any utility function with independent marginal utilities and diminishing marginal utility for each good will have a diminishing MRS.

Step by step solution

01

Define Independent Marginal Utilities

Given that we have two goods x and y, the utility function is U(x, y). Independent marginal utilities are defined as: \[ \frac{\partial^2U}{\partial x \partial y} = \frac{\partial^2U}{\partial y \partial x} = 0 \] This implies that the marginal utility of goods x and y are independent of the quantities of other goods in the basket.
02

State the assumption

We assume diminishing marginal utility for each good, that is: \[ \frac{\partial^2U}{\partial x^2} < 0 \] and \[ \frac{\partial^2U}{\partial y^2} < 0 \]
03

Define the Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS)

The MRS is the rate at which a consumer is willing to trade one good for another, keeping the utility constant. Mathematically, it is defined as: \[ MRS_{xy} = -\frac{\partial U / \partial x}{\partial U / \partial y} \]
04

Show that any utility function with independent marginal utilities will have diminishing MRS

Using the assumption of diminishing marginal utility and the given condition of independent marginal utilities, let's compute the second-order derivative of MRS with respect to x: \[ \frac{\partial MRS_{xy}}{\partial x} = - \frac{\frac{\partial^3U}{\partial x^3}\frac{\partial U}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial^2U}{\partial y\partial x}\frac{\partial^2U}{\partial x\partial y}}{(\frac{\partial U}{\partial y})^2} \] Since we have \(\frac{\partial^2U}{\partial x\partial y} = \frac{\partial^2U}{\partial y\partial x} = 0\) and \(\frac{\partial^2U}{\partial x^2} < 0\), it follows that: \[ \frac{\partial MRS_{xy}}{\partial x} = -\frac{\frac{\partial^3U}{\partial x^3}\frac{\partial U}{\partial y}}{(\frac{\partial U}{\partial y})^2} < 0 \] This result shows that any utility function with independent marginal utilities and diminishing marginal utility for each good will have a diminishing MRS.
05

Provide an example to show the converse is not true

Now, we need to find an example where the diminishing MRS does not necessarily imply independent marginal utilities and diminishing marginal utility for each good. Consider the utility function: \[ U(x, y) = \sqrt[3]{x^2y} \] Calculating the MRS: \[ MRS_{xy} = -\frac{2x}{3y} \] Since MRS is decreasing in x, it has a diminishing MRS. However, let's examine the marginal utilities: \[ \frac{\partial U}{\partial x} = \frac{2x}{3\sqrt[3]{x^2y}} \] \[ \frac{\partial U}{\partial y} = \frac{x^2}{3\sqrt[3]{x^2y}} \] The cross-partial derivatives are: \[ \frac{\partial^2U}{\partial x\partial y} = \frac{\partial^2U}{\partial y\partial x} = \frac{x}{3\sqrt[3]{x^2y}} \] As we can see, cross-partial derivatives are not equal to zero, which means the marginal utilities are not independent. Thus, this example demonstrates that having a diminishing MRS does not necessarily imply independent marginal utilities and diminishing marginal utility for each good.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

a. \(A\) consumer is willing to trade 3 units of \(x\) for 1 unit of \(y\) when she has 6 units of \(x\) and 5 units of \(y .\) She is also willing to trade in 6 units of \(x\) for 2 units of \(y\) when she has 12 units of \(x\) and 3 units of \(y .\) She is indifferent between bundle (6,5) and bundle \((12,3) .\) What is the utility function for goods \(x\) and \(y ?\) Hint: What is the shape of the indifference curve? b. A consumer is willing to trade 4 units of \(x\) for 1 unit of \(y\) when she is consuming bundle \((8,1) .\) She is also willing to trade in 1 unit of \(x\) for 2 units of \(y\) when she is consuming bundle \((4,4) .\) She is indifferent between these two bundles. Assuming that the utility function is Cobb-Douglas of the form \(U(x, y)=x^{\alpha} y^{\beta},\) where \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are positive constants, what is the utility function for this consumer? c. Was there a redundancy of information in part (b)? If yes, how much is the minimum amount of information required in that question to derive the utility function?

As we saw in Figure \(3.5,\) one way to show convexity of indifference curves is to show that for any two points \(\left(x_{1}, y_{1}\right)\) and \(\left(x_{2}, y_{2}\right)\) on an indifference curve that promises \(U=k\), the utility associated with the point \(\left(\frac{x_{1}+x_{2}}{2}, \frac{y_{1}+y_{2}}{2}\right)\) is at least as great as \(k .\) Use this approach to discuss the convexity of the indifference curves for the following three functions. Be sure to graph your results. a. \(U(x, y)=\min (x, y)\) b. \(U(x, y)=\max (x, y)\) c. \(U(x, y)=x+y\)

Graph a typical indifference curve for the following utility functions, and determine whether they have convex indifference curves (i.e., whether the \(M R S\) declines as \(x\) increases). a. \(U(x, y)=3 x+y\) \(\mathrm{b}, U(x, y)=\sqrt{x \cdot y}\) \(c_{\cdot} U(x, y)=\sqrt{x}+y\) \(\mathrm{d} . U(x, y)=\sqrt{x^{2}-y^{2}}\) \(\mathrm{e}, U(x, y)=\frac{x y}{x+y}\)

As we saw in Figure \(3.5,\) one way to show convexity of indifference curves is to show that for any two points \(\left(x_{1}, y_{1}\right)\) and \(\left(x_{2}, y_{2}\right)\) on an indifference curve that promises \(U=k\), the utility associated with the point \(\left(\frac{x_{1}+x_{2}}{2}, \frac{y_{1}+y_{2}}{2}\right)\) is at least as great as \(k .\) Use this approach to discuss the convexity of the indifference curves for the following three functions. Be sure to graph your results. a. \(U(x, y)=\min (x, y)\) b. \(U(x, y)=\max (x, y)\) c. \(U(x, y)=x+y\)

Consider the function \(U(x, y)=x+\ln y .\) This is a function that is used relatively frequently in economic modeling as it has some useful properties. a. Find the \(M R S\) of the function. Now, interpret the result. b. Confirm that the function is quasi-concave. c. Find the equation for an indifference curve for this function. d. Compare the marginal utility of \(x\) and \(y .\) How do you interpret these functions? How might consumers choose between \(x\) and \(y\) as they try to increase their utility by, for example, consuming more when their income increases? (We will look at this "income effect" in detail in the Chapter 5 problems.) e. Considering how the utility changes as the quantities of the two goods increase, describe some situations where this function might be useful.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free